Comparison Between Blumgart Anastomosis and Cattell Warren Anastomosis in Reduction of Post-Operative Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy Procedure
Comparison Between Blumgart Anastomosis and Cattell Warren Anastomosis in Reduction of Post-Operative Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy Procedure
The aim of this study is to make a step for evaluation and presentation of a safe technique for pancreatico-jejunostomy that help in minimizing post-operative morbidity and mortality in pancreatic cancer patient by comparing Blumgart anastomosis with Cattell warren technique of anastomosis.
Study Design This study is a randomized prospective clinical trial. Methods of randomization: Randomized block design
The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of Blumgart anastomosis versus Cattell Warren techniques for pancreatico-jejunostomy regarding
Surgical technique
Peri-operative outcome including
Data collection:
All data will be collected for each group and will be divided into Patients' factors, intraoperative and postoperative factors. Patients' factors include patients' demographics, co-morbidities, neoadjuvant treatment, Pathology and Biliary drainage. Intra-operative factors include type of Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) (Whether classic or PPPD), Operative time in hours and estimated blood loss in ml, pancreatic duct and texture of pancreas. Post-operative factors include the short term post-operative course which will be divided into specific complications (pancreatic leakage, biliary leakage, delayed gastric emptying, 2ry hemorrhage, intra-abdominal collection, deep wound infection, Portal Vein (PV) - Superior Mesenteric Vein (SMV) thrombosis and general surgical complications.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
ehab.a.abdelmaksoud@cu.edu.eg01099192044 ext. 002
haitham.fekry@nci.cu.edu.eg01005890222 ext. 002