The Effects of Face-to-Face vs Online Self-Natural Posture Exercise Programs on Chronic Low Back Pain
The Effects of Face-to-Face vs Online Self-Natural Posture Exercise Programs on Chronic Low Back Pain
Low back pain is a major health problem across the United States, with socio-economic burden, major cause of disability, and poor quality of life. One such non-pharmacologic treatment is Self-Natural Posture Exercise (SNPE), a series of exercise programs developed in conjunction with orthodontic bracing principles. Belts are worn around the hips (pelvic correction belt) and legs (right posture belt) to assist with self-directed exercise and posture correction. A typical SNPE program has eight different movements, targeting the entire axial skeleton. The exercises can be practiced anywhere and are widely applicable to patients as exercises are low- to moderate-intensity flexibility-based muscle strength training. There are several studies from Korea examining the efficacy of SNPE; however, there are few English language studies and there are no studies from outside the country of South Korea. As such, there is little data the generalizability of SNPE, the degree of cultural acceptance in other countries, and the all-important adherence to the home exercise program. The present study proposes to be the first study outside of South Korea to examine the effects of SNPE on chronic low back patients.
The present study seeks to repeat the previously described positive clinical impact of SNPE in a new population, examine rates of adherence, and compare the effects of face-to-face versus online courses.
Specific Aims:
A single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) design with a wait-list control group will be used to evaluate the effect of SNPE for back pain reduction. The control group will receive online SNPE intervention after serving as an untreated comparison group. The wait-list control group serves two purposes. First, it provides an untreated comparison for the face-to-face group to determine if the intervention had an effect. By serving as a comparison group, researchers are able to isolate the independent variable and look at the impact it had. Second, it allows the wait-listed participants an opportunity to obtain the intervention at a later date.
Recruitment:
Flyers, Billings Clinic employee emails, and social media will be used to recruit participants. Recruitment messages will include relevant information about the study, benefits, and inclusion criteria as well as a link to a study-specific website recapitulating this information (https://xppizim.wixsite.com/snpestudy). When patients contact the investigators, any questions will be answered. If the patient chooses to go forward, the ODI Questionnaire and Self-reported Data Form will be collected online (www.surveymonkey.com). Data will be reviewed for eligibility, and if appropriate, participant will be sent the information contained on the consent form to review; the actual signed form will be collected at time of their 1st assessment prior to the collection of data.
After being assessed by a physiatrist, eligible participants will be invited to participate in the study. All participants will have an equal chance of being randomly assigned (using a random number table from Microsoft Excel to produce random numbers).
Analyses:
All data will be exported from www.surveymonkey.com and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) application. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize demographic variables. To investigate adherence mentioned in Aim 1 and 4, frequencies and percentages will be analyzed for categorical variables and mean, standard deviation, quartiles, and ranges for continuous variables. For Aim 2 and 3, all outcome measures will be compared between groups (Assessment 1 will be considered the baseline for face-to-face (FTF) and Assessment 2 will be the baseline for online (ONL)), will be analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) via the General Linear Model (GLM). Age and gender will be controlled as covariates. If there is a significant difference using ANCOVA, we will follow up with post hoc testing.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: