Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study was designed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of MEDICURTAIN® (investigational device) compared to commercially available GUARDIX-SG® (control device) in treatment of subject who underwent total thyroidectomy for prevention of adhesion formation at 6 weeks after the surgery.
This clinical trial is a randomized, multi center, subject and evaluator blinded, parallel, comparative and non-inferiority clinical trial study to assess the prevention of adhesion formation in the subjects treated either MEDICURTAIN® or GUARDIX-SG at 6 weeks after total thyroidectomy.
The primary endpoint was defined as abnormal findings of esophageal motility evaluated by the independent third evaluator using marshmallow esophagography. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of investigational device versus control device for adhesion formation at 6 weeks after the administration of investigational or control devices.
Esophageal motility score and clinical symptoms assessed by the independent third evaluator using marshmallow esophagography at 6 weeks after administration of investigational device were secondary outcome.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| GUARDIX-SG® | Active Comparator | Treat GUARDIX-SG 6g prefilled syringe after surgery |
|
| Medicurtain® | Experimental | Treat Medicurtain® 5ml prefilled syringe after surgery |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GUARDIX-SG® | Device | GUARDIX-SG® 6g prefilled syringe |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Presence of abnormal findings of esophageal motility evaluated by the independent third evaluator using marshmallow esophagography obtained at 6 weeks after administration of investigational device. | The percentage of abnormal findings measured as mild/moderate/severe in the esophageal motor performance score through marshmallow esophagography is the incidence of adhesion. The esophageal motility was scored as normal 3 point, mild 2 point, moderate 1 point and severe 0 point. | Week 6 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Esophageal motility score assessed by the independent third evaluator using marshmallow esophagography obtained at 6 weeks after administration of investigational device | The esophageal motility was scored as normal 3 point, mild 2 point, moderate 1 point and severe 0 point. | Week 6 |
| Clinical Symptoms assessed using questionnaire by investigator assessed by using 10 point visual analogue scale (VAS). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Byung In Moon, MD, PhD | Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Hang-Seok Chang, MD, PhD | Gangnam Severance Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Gil Soo Son, MD, PhD | Korea University | Principal Investigator |
| Seung Ki Kim, MD, PhD | Cha University Bundang Cha Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital | Seoul | Gangnam-gu, Eonju-ro, 211 | South Korea |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000267 | Tissue Adhesions |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002921 | Cicatrix |
| D005355 | Fibrosis |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Medicurtain® | Device | Medicurtain® 5ml prefilled syringe |
|
|
The questionnaire is composed of three questions as shown below.
|
| Follows up to week 6 |
| Clinical Symptoms assessed using questionnaire by subject assessed by using 10 point visual analogue scale (VAS). | The questionnaire is composed of four questions as shown below.
| Follows up to week 6 |