Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| American Heart Association | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this research study is to find out the optimal intensity and frequency of Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound (LIFU) that is safe and tolerable in people who have had a stroke.
Aim 1 is to determine the optimal intensity of Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound stimulation (LIFUS) in stroke patients in terms of safety. We will investigate the optimal spatial-peak temporal-average intensity/ISPTA in the range of 0(or sham) W/cm2 to 8 W/cm2. Safety will be investigated by assessing clinically detectable signs and symptoms by monitoring vital signs and surveying subjects with a questionnaire before and after each stimulation session, and additionally by detecting subclinical neuronal injury using MRI/DWI. Aim 1 requires up to 36 subjects.
Aim 2 is to determine the optimal frequency of LIFU stimulation in stroke patients in terms of cortical excitability. Stroke subjects undergo each of the 5 frequency levels (0.35 MHz; 0.5 MHz; 0.75 MHz, 1.0 MHz and 1.5 MHz) on 5 different days with at least one day washout. The intensity (ISPTA) will set up at the level that is determined from Aim 1. Cortical excitability is measured by the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) from the Abductor Pollicis Brevis (ABP) muscle of the affected side. MEPs will be recorded pre- and post-stimulation to determine the optimal intensity for maximal cortical excitability from the hemisphere where the lesion is located. Aim 2 requires 18 subjects.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low Intensity Focused Ultrasonic Stimulation | Experimental | There are different combinations of intensity and frequency with LIFUS |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low Intensity Focused Ultrasonic Stimulation | Device | Brain stimulation using ultrasonic stimulation in a sequence of increasing intensity (sham, 1 W/CM2, 2 W/CM2, 4 W/CM2, 6 W/CM2, 8 W/CM2) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Outcomes, as measured by the number of participants with a "major response" - Aim 1 of study | Safety outcomes are measured by "major response" which is pre-defined by any of the following event
This is a 3+3 study design. Basically, 3 subjects are recruited at a given intensity level. If major response occurs in ≥2/3 study subjects then the trial will stop at this intensity level. If ≤ 3 subjects shows major response, 3 more subjects are recruited to further test safety at the same intensity level; if no major response occurs (i.e. major response ≤ 1/6), the intensity will be escalated to next higher level; if major response occurs ≥ 2/6 subjects, then the trial will terminate at this intensity level. The sequence for intensity escalation is sham > 1 W/cm2 > 2 W/cm2 > 4W/cm2 > 6W/cm2 > 8W/cm2. | At any point during or immediately following intervention on day of LIFUS application |
| Cortical Excitability - Aim 2 of the study | Cortical excitability is measured by Motor evoked potential(MEP) amplitude using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Mean changes on MEP ( Pre- Post- Ultrasonic Stimulation on the same day) is compared across 5 different stimulation frequency groups. | Immediately after ultrasonic stimulation |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Wayne Feng | Duke Health | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke University Hospital | Durham | North Carolina | 27710 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39842609 | Result | Huang Z, Charalambous CC, Chen M, Kim T, Sokhadze E, Song A, Jung SH, Shekhar S, Feld JA, Jiang X, Feng W. Low intensity focused ultrasound stimulation in stroke: A phase I safety & feasibility trial. Brain Stimul. 2025 Jan-Feb;18(1):179-187. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2025.01.015. Epub 2025 Jan 20. |
Not provided
Not provided
we will follow the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association data sharing policy per grant requirement
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2025 | May 2, 2025 | 10 | ||
| Jul 30, 2025 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Low Intensity Focused Ultrasonic Stimulation Frequency | Device | Brain stimulation using ultrasonic stimulation of intensity level determined from intervention 1 at progressively increasing frequency levels (0.35 MHz; 0.5 MHz; 0.75 MHz, 1.0 MHz and 1.5 MHz) |
|
| Aug 15, 2025 |
| 11 |
| Nov 6, 2025 | Nov 19, 2025 | 12 |
| Apr 22, 2026 | May 13, 2026 | 13 |
| Jun 8, 2026 | Jul 2, 2026 | 14 |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |