Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A comparison between The analgesic efficacy of adductor canal block alone and adductor canal with IPACK (interspace between popliteal artery and capsule of the knee) block for knee surgeries
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A (adductor canal only) | Active Comparator | Will recieve adductor canal block only |
|
| Group AB (adductor canal + IPACK) | Active Comparator | Will recieve both adductor canal block and IPACK |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adductor canal block and IPACK block | Procedure | Peripheral nerve blocks |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment of post operative pain | Using visual analogue scale (VAS) (scale 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain) | One year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Range of movement and ambulation | the range of movement (ROM) by assessing the degree of knee extension one day after the surgery, and ambulation distance assessed by the number of steps walked by the patient three days after the surgery. | One year |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ain Shams University | Cairo | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided