Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This prospective study included patients with primary angle-closure (PAC or primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) and visually significant cataract. Phacoemulsification with multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL) or monofocal IOL (mIOL) (patient preference) was performed. Collected data included best-corrected distant visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and contrast sensitivity (CS) measured at spatial frequency 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0, and 18.0 cycles per degree (CPD) preoperatively, and at 2-6 months postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative parameters were compared to evaluate the effect of MIOL on CS in eyes with PAC or PACG.
This prospective non-randomized clinical study was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology of the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand during January 2014 to December 2015. The study protocol and informed consent procedures were both approved by our center's institutional review board (IRB) (approval number Si 384/2014). Each patient provided written informed consent prior to participation.
Primary angle closure was defined as an eye with invisible non-pigmented trabecular meshwork greater than 180 degrees and evidence of peripheral anterior synechiae on gonioscopy without glaucomatous optic disc appearance, glaucomatous pattern visual field damage, or history of increased IOP. Primary angle closure glaucoma was defined as an eye with invisible non-pigmented trabecular meshwork greater than 180 degrees on gonioscopy with glaucomatous optic damage (cup-to-disc ratio greater than 0.5 and/or localized neuro-retinal rim defect) and history of increased IOP raising. Patients with PACG must have been under good disease control, which was defined as IOP under 20 mmHg with 1 to 3 topical anti-glaucoma medications without deterioration of visual field, except generalized depression from cataract. Intra-ocular lens calculation was performed at the baseline visit using IOL Master. All patients received information about the advantages and disadvantages of MIOLs (Tecnis ZMB00 or Acrysof IQ Restore SN6AD1) and of mIOLs (Tecnis ZCB00 or Acrysof IQ SN60WF) before choosing the type of IOL that they individually preferred. Cataract surgery was performed by a single surgeon. Topical anesthesia was applied before standard phacoemulsification (2.2 mm temporal clear cornea incision and continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis) and IOL implantation into the capsular bag. Eyes with any intraoperative or postoperative complication were excluded.
Data specific to uncorrected and best-corrected distant visual acuities (UCVA and BCVA) in logMar, auto-refraction, slit-lamp ophthalmoscopic examination, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement with Goldmann applanation tonometry, contrast sensitivity (CS), anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), and axial length (AL) were collected on the preoperative screening day, and at the 2 to 6-month postoperative follow-up. CS was measured under normal room light (photopic) conditions to evaluate patient quality of vision during the performance of their daily activities using a Functional Vision Analyzer. This test produces sine-wave gratings of different spatial frequencies. The absolute values of distance CS were obtained at five spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree; CPD). Visante® AS-OCT was used to determine CCT and ACD. ACD was defined as the distance between the corneal endothelium and the anterior surface of the crystalline lens (preoperative) or iris plane (postoperative). Axial length was obtained using IOL Master.
Comparisons of continuous data with normal distribution were made using Student's t-test for unpaired data, and using Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed data. A p-value of less than 0.05 was defined as denoting statistical significance.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multifocal intraocular lens group | Experimental | Cataract patients with PAC or PACG who underwent phacoemulsification with multifocal intraocular lens implantation. |
|
| Monofocal intraocular lens group | Sham Comparator | Cataract patients with PAC or PACG who underwent phacoemulsification with monofocal intraocular lens implantation which are the standard IOL. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contrast sensitivity | Diagnostic Test | All subjects performed the contrast sensitivity measurement preoperatively and one time at 2 months postoperatively. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Contrast sensitivity | Contrast sensitivity at partial frequency 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0, and 18.0 cycles per degree (CPD) | Preoperative (on screening day) |
| Contrast sensitivity | Contrast sensitivity at partial frequency 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0, and 18.0 cycles per degree (CPD) | At 2nd month postoperatively |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual acuity | Visual acuity at distance in LogMar | Preoperative (on screening day) |
| Visual acuity | Visual acuity at distance in LogMar |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naris Kitnarong | Bangkoknoi | Bangkok | 10700 | Thailand |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040877 | Result | Teichman JC, Ahmed II. Intraocular lens choices for patients with glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;21(2):135-43. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283365154. | |
| 17722234 | Result | Kim CY, Chung SH, Kim TI, Cho YJ, Yoon G, Seo KY. Comparison of higher-order aberration and contrast sensitivity in monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. Yonsei Med J. 2007 Aug 31;48(4):627-33. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2007.48.4.627. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015812 | Glaucoma, Angle-Closure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005901 | Glaucoma |
| D009798 | Ocular Hypertension |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015350 | Contrast Sensitivity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014792 | Visual Acuity |
| D014787 | Vision Tests |
| D003941 | Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided
Cataract patients with PAC or PACG who schedule for phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation. The patients must decide preoperatively to use multifocal IOL or monofocal IOL (patient preference) after receiving clear information about those 2 IOL models. Postoperatively, the contrast sensitivity (CS)will be measured with the same method. The postoperative CS were compared between groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| At 2nd month postoperatively |
| Anterior chamber depth | Anterior chamber depth | Preoperative (on screening day) |
| Anterior chamber depth | Anterior chamber depth | At 2nd month postoperatively |
| 17159450 | Result | Kumar BV, Phillips RP, Prasad S. Multifocal intraocular lenses in the setting of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007 Feb;18(1):62-6. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328011d108. |
| 12686237 | Result | Montes-Mico R, Alio JL. Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Apr;29(4):703-11. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01648-6. |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D009799 | Ocular Physiological Phenomena |