Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Attempts at online data collection led to poor data quality (many missing data points from one task of the set). Study was terminated, given the data quality issues.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The experimenters will examine the relationship between utilization of positive (target cue) and negative (distractor cue) templates during a cued visual search task with performance on a set of measures related to executive functions associated with attentional control: shifting, updating, and inhibition.
The experimenters will utilize the typical procedures for the cued attentional task, while also deploying the Miyake executive function analysis. Data will also include a working memory capacity measure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attentional Tests- Miyake and others | Experimental | All participants will complete a series of behavioral tasks, including cued visual search with positive, negative, and neutral cues, Miyake executive attention tasks, and a visual working memory task. Single Arm. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioral Measurement | Behavioral | Take measurements of behavioral performance |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Positive, Negative, Neutral Attention Task Performance Speed | Reaction times on visual search task with positive, negative, and neutral cues | 1 day |
| Positive, Negative, Neutral Attention Task Performance Accuracy | Accuracy on visual search task with positive, negative, and neutral cues | 1 day |
| Miyake Executive Attention task- Updating | Updating Attention | 1 day |
| Miyake Executive Attention task-Shifting | Shifting Attention | 1 day |
| Miyake Executive Attention task-Inhibition | Inhibition of attention | 1 day |
| Working Memory Capacity | Estimate of working memory capacity based on behavioral performance | 1 day |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nancy Carlisle, PhD | Lehigh University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lehigh University | Bethlehem | Pennsylvania | 18015 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22468723 | Background | Arita JT, Carlisle NB, Woodman GF. Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):580-4. doi: 10.1037/a0027885. Epub 2012 Apr 2. | |
| 10945922 | Background | Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734. |
Not provided
Not provided
Anonymous behavioral performance data will be available for other researchers upon request
Upon publication of the work, for at least 5 years
Request
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Oct 28, 2024 | |
| Reset | Nov 19, 2024 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2024 | Nov 19, 2024 |
Within-subjects measures, individual differences analysis
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided