Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Opera CRO, a TIGERMED Group Company | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The use of hyaluronic acid (HA)-based fillers administered by injection to obtain Labia Majora augmentation is performed by many surgeons and gynaecologists in Europe, US and other countries, but few studies have investigated the effectiveness of this procedure. In this open not comparative study, 36 female subjects above or equal to 18 years old at inclusion, seeking genital rejuvenation, who have congenital or post-menopausal hypotrophy of the vulvar Labia Majora (or a diagnosis of Body Dysmorphic Disorder), who have given her informed consent and meet all the eligibility criteria, will be enrolled. Subjects will come to a total of 4 visits over a period of 2 months.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the performance of the dermal filler by the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at day 60 and the safety during all the study. The secondary objectives are the evaluation of volume restoration of Labia Majora (measured by caliper and Ultrasound) and the subjective evaluation (by Genital Appearance Satisfaction Scale) at different visits.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Janesse 20 | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janesse 20 (Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid) | Device | Janesse 20 will be administered at baseline (visit 2, day 0) and, if the Investigator will evaluate necessary, also at day 30 (visit 3). The Investigational device will be injected with retrograde technique (moving backward) with homogeneous amount on the length of each side of Labia Majora. The Janesse 20 dosage administered will be 1 ml in left labia and 1 ml in right labia for each session. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) is will be evaluated by the investigator using standardized photos. The scale is using scores as 1= VERY MUCH IMPROVED, 2= MUCH IMPROVED, 3 = IMPROVED, 4 = NO CHANGE, 5= WORSE. The picture will be done at 60 days after the initiation of treatment with Janesse 20, will be compared with Baseline Visit (day 0) and one of the above-mentioned scores will be gibed used to indicate the changes after the treatment. | 60 days |
| Overall safety | The overall safety will be evaluated by safety checklist for the patient (modified from Liu S, 2010) and the searching of Adverse Event (s), Adverse Device Event (s), Serious Adverse Event (s), Serious Adverse Device Event (s), Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Event (s) and Device Deficiency at each visit. | up to 60 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions of Labia Majora | The measurement will be performed with the subject in lithotomy position at the different visits using a Sliding Zuricher Caliper mm130 for length and width; the ultrasound technique will be used to evaluate the depth. | 30 days, 60 days |
| Genital Appearance Satisfaction (GAS) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Explorative outcome (Labia Majora volume) | The validation of measurements of Labia Majora volume by a 3D software during the study period comparing these values with the dimensions obtained with ultrasound (for depth) and caliper (for lenght and width). Tridimensional surface imaging for estimating Labia Majora volume using Crisalix iPad App and the Crisalix 3D Surface Imager Camera will be evaluated by blind Investigator at different visits. The data will be collected and evaluated in 1 center only (Genova). |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Women seeking genital rejuvenation with Genital Appearance Satisfaction Scale (GAS) >20
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dionisio F Barattini, MD Europe | Contact | +40774012684 | franco.barattini@tigermedgrp.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Villa Serena | Not yet recruiting | Genova | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28388734 | Background | Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics. Aesthet Surg J. 2017 May 1;37(suppl_2):1-29. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx076. No abstract available. | |
| 29342228 | Background | Bucknor A, Chen AD, Egeler S, Bletsis P, Johnson AR, Myette K, Lin SJ, Hamori CA. Labiaplasty: Indications and Predictors of Postoperative Sequelae in 451 Consecutive Cases. Aesthet Surg J. 2018 May 15;38(6):644-653. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx241. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Genital Appearance Satisfaction (GAS) self-assessment of the subject to assess the change comparing the final and baseline value. The scale contains 11 statements regarding attitudes towards genital appearance. Each item is scored on a Likert scale between 0 (="NEVER") and 3 =("ALWAYS"). Total scores range from 0 to 33. Higher scores represent greater dissatisfaction with the genitalia. |
| 30 days, 60 days |
| Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) evaluated by blind Investigator, using scores 1= VERY MUCH IMPROVED, 2= MUCH IMPROVED, 3 = IMPROVED, 4 = NO CHANGE, 5= WORSE. | 30 days, 60 days |
| 30 days, 60 days |
| SCM Dr Rosu | Recruiting | Timișoara | Romania |
|
| 28285885 | Background | Ouar N, Guillier D, Moris V, Revol M, Francois C, Cristofari S. [Postoperative complications of labia minora reduction. Comparative study between wedge and edge resection]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2017 Jun;62(3):219-223. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Mar 9. French. |
| 27153040 | Background | Vanaman M, Bolton J, Placik O, Fabi SG. Emerging Trends in Nonsurgical Female Genital Rejuvenation. Dermatol Surg. 2016 Sep;42(9):1019-29. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000697. |
| 26499942 | Background | Hunter JG. Labia Minora, Labia Majora, and Clitoral Hood Alteration: Experience-Based Recommendations. Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Jan;36(1):71-9. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv092. Epub 2015 Oct 24. |
| 26912581 | Background | Sharp G, Mattiske J, Vale KI. Motivations, Expectations, and Experiences of Labiaplasty: A Qualitative Study. Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Sep;36(8):920-8. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw014. Epub 2016 Feb 23. |
| 28350660 | Background | Sorice SC, Li AY, Canales FL, Furnas HJ. Why Women Request Labiaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Apr;139(4):856-863. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003181. |
| 26893523 | Background | Sharp G, Tiggemann M, Mattiske J. Factors That Influence the Decision to Undergo Labiaplasty: Media, Relationships, and Psychological Well-Being. Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Apr;36(4):469-78. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv270. Epub 2016 Feb 18. |
| 19912495 | Background | Goodman MP, Placik OJ, Benson RH 3rd, Miklos JR, Moore RD, Jason RA, Matlock DL, Simopoulos AF, Stern BH, Stanton RA, Kolb SE, Gonzalez F. A large multicenter outcome study of female genital plastic surgery. J Sex Med. 2010 Apr;7(4 Pt 1):1565-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01573.x. Epub 2009 Nov 12. |
| 24239491 | Background | Veale D, Eshkevari E, Ellison N, Costa A, Robinson D, Kavouni A, Cardozo L. A comparison of risk factors for women seeking labiaplasty compared to those not seeking labiaplasty. Body Image. 2014 Jan;11(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Nov 14. |
| 11011912 | Background | Jackson TD, Grilo CM, Masheb RM. Teasing history, onset of obesity, current eating disorder psychopathology, body dissatisfaction, and psychological functioning in binge eating disorder. Obes Res. 2000 Sep;8(6):451-8. doi: 10.1038/oby.2000.56. |
| 17909958 | Background | de Jong PJ, van Overveld M, Schultz WW, Peters ML, Buwalda FM. Disgust and contamination sensitivity in vaginismus and dyspareunia. Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Apr;38(2):244-52. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9240-x. Epub 2007 Oct 2. |
| 28350661 | Background | Hamori CA. Discussion: Why Women Request Labiaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Apr;139(4):864. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003183. No abstract available. |
| Background | Berreni N. Augmentation of the Labia Majora With Fillers. In: Hamori CA, Banwel PE, Alinsod R, editors. Female Cosmetic Genital Surgery: concepts, classification, and techniques. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc; 2017. p 125-142. |
| 28449124 | Background | Jabbour S, Kechichian E, Hersant B, Levan P, El Hachem L, Noel W, Nasr M. Labia Majora Augmentation: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Oct 16;37(10):1157-1164. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx056. |
| 27241363 | Background | Fasola E, Gazzola R. Labia Majora Augmentation with Hyaluronic Acid Filler: Technique and Results. Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Nov;36(10):1155-1163. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw083. Epub 2016 May 30. |
| 27227470 | Background | Hexsel D, Dal'Forno T, Caspary P, Hexsel CL. Soft-Tissue Augmentation With Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Labia Majora and Mons Pubis. Dermatol Surg. 2016 Jul;42(7):911-4. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000733. No abstract available. |
| 28702976 | Background | Zerbinati N, Haddad RG, Bader A, Rauso R, D'Este E, Cipolla G, Calligaro A, Gonzalez P, Salvatore S, Serafin D. A new hyaluronic acid polymer in the augmentation and restoration of labia majora. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2017 APR-JUN;31(2 Suppl. 2):153-161. |
| Background | Bramwell, R, Morland, C. Genital appearance satisfaction in women: The development of a questionnaire and exploration of correlates. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2009; 27, 15-27. |
| 23394414 | Background | Veale D, Eshkevari E, Ellison N, Cardozo L, Robinson D, Kavouni A. Validation of genital appearance satisfaction scale and the cosmetic procedure screening scale for women seeking labiaplasty. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Mar;34(1):46-52. doi: 10.3109/0167482X.2012.756865. |
| 29940085 | Background | Kreklau A, Vaz I, Oehme F, Strub F, Brechbuhl R, Christmann C, Gunthert A. Measurements of a 'normal vulva' in women aged 15-84: a cross-sectional prospective single-centre study. BJOG. 2018 Dec;125(13):1656-1661. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15387. Epub 2018 Aug 1. |
| 15622265 | Background | Lindqvist C, Tveten S, Bondevik BE, Fagrell D. A randomized, evaluator-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Perlane versus Zyplast in the correction of nasolabial folds. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Jan;115(1):282-9. |
| 30052757 | Background | Fasola E, Bosoni D. Dynamic Quadripolar Radiofrequency: Pilot Study of a New High-Tech Strategy for Prevention and Treatment of Vulvar Atrophy. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Apr 8;39(5):544-552. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy180. |
| 29420725 | Background | Joumblat NR, Chim J, Aguirre Sanchez PG, Bedolla E, Salgado CJ. Guidelines for the Standardization of Genital Photography. Aesthet Surg J. 2018 Sep 14;38(10):1124-1130. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy017. |
| 13725990 | Background | EHRENPREIS S, KELLOCK MG. The interaction of quarternary ammonium compounds with hyaluronic acid. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1960 Dec 18;45:525-8. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(60)91489-x. No abstract available. |
| Background | Georgiev GA, Yokoi N, Ivanova S, Dimitrov T, Andreev K, Krastevd R, Lalcheva Z. Surface chemistry study of the interactions of hyaluronic acid and benzalkonium chloride with meibomian and corneal cell lipids. Soft Matter, 2013,9, 10841-10856. |
| 20189912 | Background | Liu S, Ercolano E, Siefert ML, McCorkle R. Patterns of symptoms in women after gynecologic surgery. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010 Mar;37(2):E133-40. doi: 10.1188/10.ONF.E133-E140. |
| 32021707 | Background | Migda MS, Migda M, Slapa R, Mlosek RK, Migda B. The use of high-frequency ultrasonography in the assessment of selected female reproductive structures: the vulva, vagina and cervix. J Ultrason. 2019 Dec;19(79):261-268. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2019.0039. Epub 2019 Dec 31. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C562420 | Brachydactyly, Type D |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided