Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Opera CRO, a TIGERMED Group Company | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The hypothesis of this clinical investigation is that in a population of men and women affected by periocular wrinkles, lip contour wrinkles or deep facial wrinkles, will cross-linked hyaluronic acid (Janesse) significantly decrease the appearance of facial wrinkles, results observed after 4, 8 and 12 weeks.
Janesse®'s action is to increase the volume of dermal-epidermal tissue based on the natural ability of hydrophilic hyaluronic acid molecules to bind to an amount of water many times greater than their weight. This allow to fill the intradermal spaces and integrate the intercellular matrix, conferring turgidity to the tissues. The cross-linking of the hyaluronic acid contained in the product has the effect of more stable and durable filling over time.
The Research Question of the present study is the following: in a population of men and women affected by periocular wrinkles, lip contour wrinkles or deep facial wrinkles, will cross-linked hyaluronic acid (Janesse®) significantly decrease the appearance of nasolabial wrinkles, results observed after 12 weeks?
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Janesse | Other | Janesse® 20 (Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid) Injection: follow the instruction for use |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janesse® is a sterile, injectable, non-pyrogenic, re-absorbable medical product made of reticulated hyaluronic acid of non-animal origin, produced via bacterial fermentation. | Device | The subjects will receive at baseline the first IMD by the Investigator in accordance with the CIP |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| WSRS score assessed by the Investigator | To evaluate the overall safety of the medical device and performance of Janesse® dermal filler in terms of absolute change of WSRS score (Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale) assessed by Investigator at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after the initiation of treatment, compared to Baseline Visit (day 0). | 12 weeks |
| AE, SAE, ADE, SADE incidence | AE, SAE, ADE, SADE incidence | 12 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| WSRS score assessed by the patient | To evaluate the performance of the medical device in terms of change of WSRS score assessed by the subject at 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline Visit 1 (day 0). | 12 weeks |
| Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale evaluated by the subject |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mihaela Fratila | SCM Dr. Rosu | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCM Dr. Rosu | Timișoara | Timiș County | 300425 | Romania |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20844296 | Background | Fitzgerald R, Graivier MH, Kane M, Lorenc ZP, Vleggaar D, Werschler WP, Kenkel JM. Update on facial aging. Aesthet Surg J. 2010 Jul-Aug;30 Suppl:11S-24S. doi: 10.1177/1090820X10378696. | |
| 27274627 | Background | Kim BW, Moon IJ, Yun WJ, Chung BY, Kim SD, Lee GY, Chang SE. A Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Split-Face Comparison Study of the Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Mannitol Containing Monophasic Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds. Ann Dermatol. 2016 Jun;28(3):297-303. doi: 10.5021/ad.2016.28.3.297. Epub 2016 May 25. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a multi-center, open-label, non-randomized, single group clinical investigation
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Subjects will evaluate their skin appearance change compared to before the treatment, as follows:
|
| 12 weeks |
| Treatment satisfaction questionnaire completed by the subject | To assess the subject satisfaction at 4, 8 and 12 weeks, providing their degree of satisfaction with the treatment on a four-point scale (very satisfied, satisfied, moderate or not satisfied). | 12 weeks |
| Investigator Global Assessment of Performance (IGAP) | Investigator Global Assessment of Performance (IGAP) Investigator will make photographs at every visit (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) of the area treated in order to evaluate the performance of the treatment at visit 5 using a 4-point scale: 1= very good performance, 2 = good performance, 3 = moderate performance and 4 = poor performance;taken at each visit. | 12 weeks |
| Investigator Global Assessment of Safety (IGAS) | Investigator Global Assessment of Safety (IGAS) will be reported using the 4-point scale: 1= very good safety, 2 = good safety, 3 = moderate safety and 4 = poor safety. IGAS will be evaluated by the Investigator at Final visit (12 weeks), only; | 12 weeks |
| Patient Global Assessment of Safety (PGAS) | Patient Global Assessment of Safety (PGAS) will be reported by the subject at the last visit using the 4-point scale: 1= very good safety, 2 = good safety, 3 = moderate safety and 4 = poor safety. PGAS will be evaluated by the patient at Final visit (12 weeks), only. | 12 weeks |
| 25964628 | Background | Few J, Cox SE, Paradkar-Mitragotri D, Murphy DK. A Multicenter, Single-Blind Randomized, Controlled Study of a Volumizing Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Midface Volume Deficit: Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years. Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Jul;35(5):589-99. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv050. Epub 2015 May 11. |
| 23687448 | Background | Callan P, Goodman GJ, Carlisle I, Liew S, Muzikants P, Scamp T, Halstead MB, Rogers JD. Efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid filler in subjects treated for correction of midface volume deficiency: a 24 month study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013 Mar 20;6:81-9. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S40581. Print 2013. |
| 28040813 | Background | Dong J, Gantz M, Goldenberg G. Efficacy and safety of new dermal fillers. Cutis. 2016 Nov;98(5):309-313. |
| 25926750 | Background | De Boulle K, Heydenrych I. Patient factors influencing dermal filler complications: prevention, assessment, and treatment. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015 Apr 15;8:205-14. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S80446. eCollection 2015. |
| 27621659 | Background | Rivkin AZ. Volume correction in the aging hand: role of dermal fillers. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Aug 30;9:225-32. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S92853. eCollection 2016. |
| 27799807 | Background | Kuhne U, Esmann J, von Heimburg D, Imhof M, Weissenberger P, Sattler G. Safety and performance of cohesive polydensified matrix hyaluronic acid fillers with lidocaine in the clinical setting - an open-label, multicenter study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Oct 20;9:373-381. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S115256. eCollection 2016. |
| 23190816 | Background | Lorenc ZP, Bank D, Kane M, Lin X, Smith S. Validation of a four-point photographic scale for the assessment of midface volume loss and/or contour deficiency. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Dec;130(6):1330-1336. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826d9fa6. |
| 21779421 | Background | McCall-Perez F, Stephens TJ, Herndon JH Jr. Efficacy and tolerability of a facial serum for fine lines, wrinkles, and photodamaged skin. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011 Jul;4(7):51-4. |
| 22759252 | Background | Rzany B, Cartier H, Kestemont P, Trevidic P, Sattler G, Kerrouche N, Dhuin JC, Ma YM. Full-face rejuvenation using a range of hyaluronic acid fillers: efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction over 6 months. Dermatol Surg. 2012 Jul;38(7 Pt 2):1153-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02470.x. |
| 20725567 | Background | Van Dyke S, Hays GP, Caglia AE, Caglia M. Severe Acute Local Reactions to a Hyaluronic Acid-derived Dermal Filler. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010 May;3(5):32-5. |
| 25730536 | Background | Funt D, Pavicic T. Dermal fillers in aesthetics: an overview of adverse events and treatment approaches. Plast Surg Nurs. 2015 Jan-Mar;35(1):13-32. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000087. |
| 27453830 | Background | Ghooi RB, Bhosale N, Wadhwani R, Divate P, Divate U. Assessment and classification of protocol deviations. Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):132-6. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.184817. |
| 23750828 | Background | Jiang LI, Stephens TJ, Goodman R. SWIRL, a clinically validated, objective, and quantitative method for facial wrinkle assessment. Skin Res Technol. 2013 Nov;19(4):492-8. doi: 10.1111/srt.12073. Epub 2013 Jun 10. |
| 27042135 | Background | Stephens TJ, Sigler ML, Herndon JH Jr, Dispensa L, Le Moigne A. A placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of Imedeen((R)) Time Perfection((R)) for improving the appearance of photodamaged skin. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Mar 15;9:63-70. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S98787. eCollection 2016. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007267 | Injections |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004333 | Drug Administration Routes |
| D004358 | Drug Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided