Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Neurophysiologic evaluation of disorders of consciousness (DOC) patients in intensive care unit include late auditory evoked potentials. It allows the physicians to record cerebral responses of patients to auditory stimuli and in particularly to their own name (as the P3a response). Numerous studies try to improve the relevance of the auditory stimuli used in this paradigm and notably using more expressive stimuli.
Here the investigators investigate the intracerebral correlates of the P3a responses recorded on the scalp with neutral and more expressive stimuli.
Late auditory evoked potentials (as P3 wave) are used in neurophysiology to assess the level of consciousness in DOC (disorder of consciousness) patients. The P3 wave, elicited by listening standard and deviant stimuli, corresponds to the activation of a frontoparietal network and is considered to reflect a cognitive attention task. Using the own name of the patient as deviant stimuli improve the ability to detect the P3 wave because of the particularly relevance of this stimulus for the patient.
In human cognition, to identify the expressivity valence of a voice is essential. Neural processing of expressive voices should involves more widespread brain areas than neutral voices processing.
Here the investigators investigate the intracerebral correlates of the P3a responses recorded on the scalp to own-name stimuli uttered by neutral and more expressive voices (positive : smiling voice or negative : rough voice) in adult pharmacoresistant epilepsy patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole group | Experimental | The whole group undergo the two phases of the study:
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evoked related potentials | Other | Evoked related potentials are performed for each patient during each paradigm (neutral voice and expressive voices):
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Latencies cartography of intracranial responses to own-name uttered by neutral voice | Analyse of latencies of intracranial responses recorded to own-name uttered by neutral voice to build a map of the brain process of this responses | 1 year |
| Latencies cartography of intracranial responses to own-name uttered by expressive voices | Analyse of latencies of intracranial responses recorded to own-name uttered by expressive voices to build a map of the brain process of this responses | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison between brain responses to own-name uttered by expressive voices recorded with intracerebral electrodes versus scalp electrodes | Qualitative comparison between scalp and intracranial recordings with the expressive voices paradigms (comparison of the latencies of the recorded responses) | 1 year |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHU Paris - Sainte Anne | Paris | 75014 | France |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069279 | Drug Resistant Epilepsy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004827 | Epilepsy |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Open and prospective study.
Evoked related potentials are recorded on the scalp and with intracranial electrodes for each participant while they listen 3 paradigms successively and in a random order:
i) their own name uttered by a smiling voice ii) their own name uttered by a neutral voice iii) their own name uttered by a rough voice
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Comparison between brain responses to own-name uttered by neutral voices recorded with intracerebral electrodes versus scalp electrodes |
Qualitative comparison between scalp and intracranial recordings with the neutral voices paradigms (comparison of the latencies of the recorded responses) |
| 1 year |