Prefabricated Versus 3D-Printing Myofunctional Appliances

Comparison of Prefabricated Myofunctional Appliances and 3D-Printing Myofunctional Appliances in Children With Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the dentoskeletal effects of Class II division 1 treatment in growing patients with a prefabricated myofunctional appliance versus a 3D-printing myofunctional appliance.

This study aims to investigate the dentoskeletal effects of Class II division 1 treatment in growing patients with a prefabricated myofunctional appliance versus a 3D-printing myofunctional appliance.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Increased overjet >4 mm
• Skeletal Class II relationship (ANB > 4 degree)
• No previous orthodontic treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

-Craniofacial syndrome