Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study is to evaluate the effect of 3D printed modified Twin Block Appliance on skeletal Class II profile correction.
The null hypothesis of this research is that use of 3D Printed Twin Block is not able to induce skeletal rather than dental effects for correction of the skeletal Class II malocclusion in comparison with untreated growing Class II control subjects.
I- For the treatment group:
A- Medical History Questionnaire will be filled by the patient to exclude the presence of any systemic condition.
B- Clinical Examination:
Proper examination of the oral structures including;
C- Diagnosis:
D- Clinical Procedures:
After taking upper and lower impressions, the impressions are then poured into hard stone that are then digitally scanned using 3D laboratory scanner (3Shape R500 Lab Scanner).
Designing the appliance is done on upper and lower virtual models (using 3Shape Appliance Designer). The appliance covers the upper and lower dental arches with lingual horizontal rectangular attachments to increase the retention.
Buccal triangular ramps for mandibular advancement are designed. They are positioned buccal to the upper and lower posterior segments with a lock to ensure the desired mandibular advancement.
3D printing of the appliance is then done using 3D printer (Dent2-Mogassam) with biocompatible resin material (NextDent Resin OrthoRigid).
Post curing using ultraviolet light for 30min using postcuring unit (Postcuring- Mogassam).
The appliance is then delivered to the patient and instructions are given. Follow up every 4 weeks for 8 months or edge to edge occlusion (the sooner) and then full records taken including Lateral Cephalogram.
II- For the Control group
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | use of 3D printed Modified Twin Block Appliance. |
|
| Untreated control group | No Intervention | No treatment phase of 8 months. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D printed Modified Twin Block Appliance | Device | It is a functional appliance for mandibular advancement designed digitally on virtual models. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Skeletal Class II profile correction | A-Effective mandibular length in mm B- SNB in degrees using lateral cephalogram | 8months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Inclination of anterior teeth | A- L1/MP in degrees using lateral cephalogram B- L1-FP in mm | 8 months |
| Soft tissue convexity correction | Angle of convexity (N"-Sn/ N"-Pog") in degrees using lateral cephalogram |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donia Ezzeldin, Master | Contact | 01001200089 | donia.ayman@dentistry.cu.edu.eg |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Donia Ezzeldin, Master | Cairo University | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008312 | Malocclusion, Angle Class II |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008310 | Malocclusion |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
The design of this randomized controlled trial is a parallel group, two arm, superiority trial with 1:1 allocation ratio.
Not provided
Not provided
Due to the nature of the study, the operator and patients can't be blinded. Blinding of the outcome assessors can be done by sealing the name of the patient and the of the pre and post treatment radiographs used for analysis.
| 8 months |
| Patient acceptance | Five point Likert scale is used to allow the individual to express how much they agree or disagree with a particular statement. Points of Scale 5 (very satisfied) (the best) 4 (satisfied) 3 (Neutral) 2 (Dissatisfied) 1 (Very Dissatisfied) (the worst) | 8 months |