Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust | OTHER |
| Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust | OTHER_GOV |
| South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
During the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical staff working in frontline NHS hospital and pre-hospital departments (e.g. emergency department, intensive care unit, ambulance service) are being faced with difficult and stressful situations, which may be traumatic to them. Staff report high rates of post-traumatic stress symptoms, such as intrusive memories of these incidents, which 'pop into their mind' unexpectedly, are distressing and can impact on work performance. Currently there is a lack of tailored evidence-based interventions for staff struggling with intrusive memories of work-related traumatic events: simple, accessible, remotely-delivered interventions are needed. An intervention which has been found to be effective in reducing intrusive memories is a simple cognitive task that involves briefly bringing to mind the memory and then playing the computer game Tetris with specific ("mental rotation") instructions. This case series study aims to test the intervention in a group of 8-20 staff members working clinically in NHS hospital and pre-hospital departments. The intervention will be delivered remotely (via computer/smartphone/tablet/phone). Participants will record the number of intrusive memories daily over a 3-week period, with the intervention delivered after 1 week (with optional subsequent booster sessions). Symptoms of trauma, anxiety and depression will be assessed weekly over this period, and at 4 weeks after the intervention. It is predicted that participants will have fewer intrusive memories per day/week, and lower clinical symptoms scores, after completing the intervention than before completing the intervention. The study will also investigate how feasible and acceptable the intervention is for NHS staff. Findings will inform the next steps in developing and evaluating a digital intervention to reduce intrusive memories of work-related traumatic events in healthcare staff.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple cognitive task | Experimental | A brief memory reminder cue followed by playing the computer game Tetris for 25 minutes using mental rotation instructions. Option for subsequent booster sessions (self-administered/researcher-assisted). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simple cognitive task | Behavioral | A brief memory reminder cue followed by playing the computer game Tetris for 25 minutes using mental rotation instructions. Option for subsequent booster sessions (self-administered/researcher-assisted). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the number of intrusive memories of traumatic event | Number of intrusive memories of traumatic event recorded by participants in a brief electronic daily diary. | Change from baseline to post-intervention, in line with case series design. The baseline period and the post-intervention period were defined separately for each intrusive memory, according to when that intrusion was first targeted with the intervention. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in ratings of intrusive memory characteristics | A bespoke self-report measure assessing ratings of intrusive memory vividness, distress (0 = not at all, 10 = extremely), duration of bothersomeness (<1 min to >60 mins), and the impact of intrusive memories on sleep (very good to very bad), concentration and disruption of task at hand (0 = not at all; 10 = a great deal), per intrusive memory reported in the brief daily diary (high scores indicating greater impact/difficulties). Participants are also asked to record whether they were at work when they had the intrusive memory (yes/no), the approximate time the intrusive memory popped into their mind (open-ended response), how many times they used the Tetris intervention since the last diary entry (open-ended response), and how accurately they think they completed the diary (0 = not at all accurately; 10 = extremely accurately). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Within-intervention session measure: change in subjective level of arousal | Bespoke 11-point Likert-type rating scale (0 = calm to 10 = maximum arousal) was used to assess subjective level of arousal at three time points during the intervention procedure. | Change in arousal from prior to administering part I of the intervention to after completing part I of the intervention, and then from completing part I of the intervention to after completing part II of the intervention. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Craig Steel | University of Oxford | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust | Bicester | United Kingdom | ||||
| Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39556801 | Derived | Kubickova V, Steel C, Moulds ML, Kanstrup M, Beer S, Darwent M, Keating L, Holmes EA, Iyadurai L. Reducing the Number of Intrusive Memories of Work-Related Traumatic Events in Frontline Health Care Staff During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Case Series. JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Nov 18;11:e55562. doi: 10.2196/55562. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013313 | Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D040921 | Stress Disorders, Traumatic |
| D000068099 | Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Change between baseline and post-intervention, in line with case series design |
| Impact of Events Scale-Revised score (IES-R; Weiss & Marmar, 1997) | The IES-R is a self-report measure with three subscales (intrusion, avoidance and hyperarousal) which is used to assess subjective distress experienced after traumatic events. It consists of 22 items, each on a scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely") related to how distressing each item has been during the past week. A total maximum score is 88. Higher scores represent worse outcome. | Weekly for 6 weeks: 2 weeks pre-intervention to 4 weeks post-intervention |
| The Patient Health Questionnaire Depression scale (PHQ-9; Kroenke, Spitzer, & Williams, 2001) | The PHQ-9 is a brief self-report measure of depression symptoms and their severity. It consists of nine items that are rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). The total maximum score is 27. Higher scores represent worse outcome. | Weekly for 6 weeks: 2 weeks pre-intervention to 4 weeks post-intervention |
| The Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7; Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams & Löwe, 2006) | The GAD-7 is a brief self-report measure of symptoms of general anxiety disorder (GAD) and their severity. It consists of seven items that are rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). The total maximum score is 21. Higher scores represent worse outcome. | Weekly for 6 weeks: 2 weeks pre-intervention to 4 weeks post-intervention |
| The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; Buysse, 1989) | The PSQI (Buysse, 1989) is a self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over a 1-month time interval. The measure consists of nine questions, which produce one global score. Higher scores represent worse outcome. | At 1 week pre-intervention, and at 4 weeks post-intervention |
| Change in retrospective ratings of intrusive memory characteristics over the last week | A 10-item bespoke questionnaire assessing ratings of intrusive memories retrospectively over the last week (frequency, vividness, distress, impact on concentration, task disruption, interference with night's sleep, impact on daily functioning, and duration of bothersomeness). Six questions are rated on an 11-point scale from 0 ("not at all") to 10 ("a great deal") (high scores indicating greater impact/difficulties): e.g. How much did they disrupt your concentration?; How much have your intrusive memories affected your ability to function in your daily life? Two questions are rated using discrete categories: approximately how long did the intrusive memory bother you for? (6 time categories from <1 min to >60 mins); over the last week, how many intrusive memories did you have? (7 categories from 'none (0)' to 'more (more than 50'). One question is open-ended: how have your intrusive memories affected your ability to function in your daily life in the past week? (open-ended response) | At 1 week pre-intervention, and at 4 weeks post-intervention |
| Feedback questionnaire | 11-item Feedback Questionnaire assessing participant experience of the intervention including ratings of how easy, helpful and burdensome they found the intervention, and open-ended questions about their experience of the intervention. | At 4 weeks post-intervention |
| Oxford |
| United Kingdom |
| Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust | Reading | United Kingdom |