Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Medelis Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This double blind, randomized, parallel study evaluates the non-inferiority of Geistlich Fibro-GideĀ® in comparison to connective tissue graft for soft tissue volume augmentation around dental implants
A total sample size of 60 subjects (n=60) will be evaluated at 5 centers, by 6 Investigators with approximately 10-subjects per Investigator. Power analysis based on 80% power, past Thoma, Zeltner and GonzƔlez-Martin studies 1,2,3 and a one-sided confidence interval of 0.025, indicates that with a volume change standard deviation between 0.5 and 0.7 mm, 17-31 subjects are required per group (test and control), so 50-60 subjects are an acceptable estimate, with a preference for 60, given potential loss to long-term follow-up.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Active Comparator | Soft tissue flap + Connective Tissue Graft |
|
| Test | Experimental | Soft tissue flap + Geistlich Fibro-GideĀ® |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soft tissue flap + Connective Tissue Graft | Procedure | The treatment site is accessed using a full thickness flap extending at least 1 full tooth mesial and distal, vertical releasing incisions may be used to obtain flap release for full coverage of the treatment site and graft without compression. The harvest graft donor area will be the palate in the bicuspid region on the same side as the control soft tissue augmentation therapy. The CTG will be harvested using full thickness incisions that include the periosteum and will be closed using suture and coating the incision line with a tissue adhesive. No covering stents or packs should be employed. The CTG will be sling sutured in place and the flap secured using a double sling suturing technique. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in gingival soft tissue volume assessed with 3D scanning | Change in gingival soft tissue volume compared to baseline [Time Frame 6 months post-treatment] Measured by digital contour scan | 6 months post treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| All Adverse Events, serious and non serious | Recording and Assessment of all (S)AEs starting from Visit 2 onwards, Surgery | Day 0, after 2, 4, 12weeks, 6 Months, 1,3,5 Years |
| Post-OP Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Donald S Clem III, DDS | Regenative Solutions | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regenerative Solutions | Fullerton | California | 92835 | United States | ||
| McClain Schallhorn Periodonitcs |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
parallel, randomized, controlled, single-blind, multi-centre clinical trial
Not provided
Not provided
Single-blind (Outcomes Examiner)
|
| Soft tissue flap + Geistlich Fibro-GideĀ® | Device | The treatment site is accessed using a full thickness flap extending at least 1 full tooth mesial and distal, vertical releasing incisions may be used to obtain flap release for full coverage of the treatment site and matrix without compression. Geistlich Fibro-GideĀ® is cut to shape to the treatment site and placed dry into the site. The flap is secured using a double sling suturing technique. |
|
subjects will answer a questionnaire regarding discomfort, esthetic satisfaction and overall satisfaction questions asked by a 3rd-party rec
At Visits 2-weeks, and 1- and 3-months post-operative, subjects will answer discomfort/ pain questions asked by a 3rd-party recorder.
| 6 Months, 1,3,5 Years |
| Concomitant medication | Concomitant medication review compared with Visit 1 and 2 | 2,4,12 weeks, 6 months, 1,3,5 Years |
| Change in gingival soft tissue contour | soft tissue contour measured digitally ( 3D-scan) and compared with baseline | 3 months, 1,3, 5 Years |
| General Periodontal Examination (GPE) | Changes of GPE at various visits compared to baseline, | 4, 12 weeks, 6 Months, 1,3,5 Years |
| Pink esthetic score (PES) | pink esthetic score evaluates soft tissue around single-tooth implants. The PES is based on seven variables: Mesial papilla, Distal papilla, Soft tissue Level, Soft-tissue contour, Alveolar process deficiency, Soft-tissue Color, Soft tissue texture, 2-1-0 score | 6 Months, 1,3,5 Years |
| Aurora |
| Colorado |
| 80012-3202 |
| United States |
| Perio Health Professionals | Houston | Texas | 77063 | United States |
| Periodontal and Dental Implant Surgical Specialist | Virginia Beach | Virginia | 23226 | United States |
| Santarelli Oral and Facial Surgery | Kenosha | Wisconsin | 53144 | United States |