Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In order to obtain the risk level of patients with intestinal insufficiency through simple indicators, many foreign scholars have studied and developed their own prediction models. However, the current guideline indicates that there is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of a specialized predictive model for clinical practice.There are few studies on external validation of existing prediction models.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| no intervention | Other | no intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| discrimination | Compare the area under the curve (AUC) between predictive models and acutal bowel preparation. | cross-sectional analyses in 2020 |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Adult patients undergoing colonoscopy
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ningbo first hospital | Ningbo | Zhejiang | 315000 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35467123 | Derived | Yuan X, Gao H, Liu C, Wang W, Xie J, Zhang Z, Xu L. External validation of two prediction models for adequate bowel preparation in Asia: a prospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jun;37(6):1223-1229. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04156-0. Epub 2022 Apr 25. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided