Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study compares the rate of en-masse retraction using 0.018-inch versus 0.022-inch slot orthodontic bracket systems in adult patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.018-inch slot orthodontic bracket system | Experimental | En-masse retraction using frictionless mechanics with 0.018-inch slot orthodontic bracket system. |
|
| 0.022-inch slot orthodontic bracket system | Active Comparator | En-masse retraction using frictionless mechanics with 0.022-inch slot orthodontic bracket system. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bonding | Procedure | Bonding of upper and lower arches including 2nd maxillary molars with bracket prescription Roth 0.018 inch |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Retraction Rate | The rate of en-masse retraction of the anterior teeth | 6 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014894 | Weights and Measures |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Leveling and alignment | Procedure | Leveling and alignment till 0.016 x0.022 Ni Ti |
|
| Extraction | Procedure | Extraction of maxillary 1st premolars |
|
| Retraction | Procedure | En-masse retraction using 0.017x0.025 TMA T loop |
|
| Digital models | Procedure | impression taking and digital scanning |
|
| measurement | Procedure | Assessment the rate of retraction for 6 months |
|