Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Ankara Training and Research Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this study, the investigators compared mechanical and manual chest compressions in in-hospital cardiac arrest cases.
In this study, the investigators analyzed cardiopulmonary resuscitations performed over a 2-year period in an emergency department of a training and research hospital and compared success of manual and mechanical chest compressions in terms of return of spontaneous circulation, 30-day survival, and hospital discharge. Investigators present the study as an in-hospital cardiac arrest study; however, all of the resuscitation performed in the cases included in the study were performed in the emergency department.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manuel compression | Manuel chest compressions will be handled by clinicians |
| |
| Mechanical compression | Mechanical chest compressions will be handled via mechanical chest compression device |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuel chest compressions handled by clinicians | Other | Compressions will be handled by human efforts |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mortality rate on the 30th day | Mortality rates from the hospital admission to the 30th day | 30 days |
| Rate of the return of spontaneous circulation | Rate of return of the spontaneous circulation with duration at least five minutes | 5 minutes |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Over 18 age Cardiac arrest cases In-hospital cardiac arrest cases Resuscitations performed in emergency department
Exclusion Criteria:
<18 age
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Cases with cardiac arrest in-hospital environment (in emergency department) and whose had manual or mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation in emergency department included in the study; data were collected hospital management information system and analyzed retropectively.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine | Ankara | Çankaya | 06800 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26976675 | Background | Couper K, Yeung J, Nicholson T, Quinn T, Lall R, Perkins GD. Mechanical chest compression devices at in-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2016 Jun;103:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Mar 11. | |
| 30165909 | Background | Couper K, Quinn T, Lall R, Devrell A, Orriss B, Seers K, Yeung J, Perkins GD; COMPRESS-RCT collaborators. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in the treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a non-shockable rhythm: a randomised controlled feasibility trial (COMPRESS-RCT). Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 30;26(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0538-6. |
Not provided
Not provided
There is no plan to share individual participant data (IPD) with other researchers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006323 | Heart Arrest |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression System | Device | LUCAS-2 model piston-based mechanical chest compression device was used for mechanical chest compressions |
|