Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Ankara Training and Research Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this study, the investigators compared mechanical and manual chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases.
In this study, the investigators retrospectively analyzed resuscitations performed over a 2-year period and compared manual and mechanical chest compressions in terms of return of spontaneous circulation, 30-day survival, and hospital discharge parameters.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manuel chest compression | Manuel chest compressions will be handled by human efforts. |
| |
| Mechanical chest compression | In the study, chest compression in the mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation group was performed with the Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System (LUCAS) Chest Compression System (LUCAS 2). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUCASâ„¢ 2 Chest Compression System | Device | LUCAS is a portable device designed to rule out the problems encountered during manual chest compression, capable of performing standard and continuous chest compressions at a depth of 4-5 cm and at least 100 times per minute. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of the mortality on the 30th day | Mortality from the admission to the 30th day | 30 days |
| Rate of the return of spontaneous circulation | Return of spontaneous circulation at least 5 minutes | 5 minutes |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Over 18 age Cardiac arrest cases Out-of-hospital arrest
Exclusion Criteria:
<18 age
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The data of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency department were analyzed retrospectively.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine | Ankara | Çankaya | 06800 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30686332 | Background | Brodal Syversen K, Souvannasacd E, Renger R. Validating the LUCAS(R) mechanical chest compression fit specifications. Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;37(2):371-373. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.06.069. Epub 2018 Jun 30. No abstract available. | |
| 26607332 | Background | Bonnes JL, Brouwer MA, Navarese EP, Verhaert DV, Verheugt FW, Smeets JL, de Boer MJ. Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Versus CPR Including a Mechanical Chest Compression Device in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis From Randomized and Observational Studies. Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;67(3):349-360.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.09.023. Epub 2015 Nov 19. |
Not provided
Not provided
There is no plan to share individual participant data (IPD) with other researchers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006323 | Heart Arrest |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Manuel chest compressions by human efforts | Other | In this way chest compressions will be handled by humans themselves. |
|
| 26190673 | Background | Gates S, Quinn T, Deakin CD, Blair L, Couper K, Perkins GD. Mechanical chest compression for out of hospital cardiac arrest: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2015 Sep;94:91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 17. |