Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background: Lung transplant recipients (LTR) have the highest risk of CMV infection. CMV pneumonitis, lymphocytic bronchitis, and detection of CMV DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid are independent risk factors for the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). However, to demonstrate the clinical impact of the indirect effects of CMV, it is necessary to conduct studies with a very large sample size.
Hypothesis: The different current preventive strategies for CMV infection in LTR and their clinical application on a daily basis impact on the development of direct and indirect effects of CMV in this population.
Objectives: To study the effect of CMV infection on LTR in relation to current preventive strategies in terms of:
Relevance: Knowing in detail the current epidemiology of CMV infection in LTR and its subsequent influence on both mortality and the presence of different complications, could allow improving the management of these patients in the future.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prophylaxis | Those LTR receiving prophylaxis against CMV |
| |
| Preemptive therapy | Those LTR receiving preemptive therapy against CMV |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prophylaxis | Procedure | The intervention consists of analyzing the differences in the evolution of lung transplant recipients in relation to the intervention of prophylaxis or preemptive therapy against CMV in LTR |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| CMV infection and/or disease | Incidence | Two-year follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Graft rejection both acute or CLAD | Incidence | Two-year follow-up |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
· Survival > 1 month post-transplant
• High to moderate risk patients to develop CMV disease by means of pre-transplant CMV serology:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
All those LTR performed in Spain during the study period
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oscar Len, MD | Contact | +34934896090 | oscar.len@vhir.org |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Preemptive | Procedure | The intervention consists of analyzing the differences in the evolution of lung transplant recipients in relation to the intervention of prophylaxis or preemptive therapy against CMV in LTR |
|