Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The R2D2-ICU study will be a prospective, parallel-group, open label, multicenter (6 centers) randomized controlled trial. All consecutive eligible patients will be included. Patients will be randomly assigned (1/1 ratio) to either systematic PR use (systematic use group) or restrictive PR use (restrictive use group). Patients in the restrictive PR group will be subjected to PR only in case of severe agitation defined by a RASS ≥ +3. Physical restraint will consist of wrist straps. In both groups, patients will receive standardized management for analgesia, sedation, delirium detection, weaning and early mobilization according to current guidelines. Concealment will be obtained using a computer-generated randomization scheme of various-sized blocks stratified by center, age (< or ≥ 65 years) and coma at the beginning of invasive mechanical ventilation (D0)) through a centralized 24h/24h internet service. Investigation blinded to group assignment is not feasible. In both arms, patients' arousal will be evaluated twice a day until day 14 with the use of RASS. Patients with a RASS of -5 or -4 will be considered comatose (and will not be assessed for delirium). Patients with a RASS score ≥ -3 will be assessed for delirium with the use of the CAM-ICU scale twice a day.
Physical restraint (PR) is defined by the HAS (Haute Autorité de Santé française) as the use of any intervention that prevent or limit movements capability, to protect a person from an inappropriate or a dangerous behavior. In French intensive care units (ICUs), wrist straps (and sometimes ankle straps) are frequently used to prevent self-removal of medical devices in case of agitation, which can affect about 50% of patients. A survey conducted in 121 French ICUs showed that in 82 % of ICUs, PR is used at least once during mechanical ventilation (MV) in more than 50 % of patients. In 65 % of ICUs, when PR is used, it is applied for more than 50 % of MV duration. In 29 % of ICUs, PR is used in more than 50 % of cases in awake, calm and co-operative patients. PR is started without written medical prescription in more than 50 % of patients in 68 % of ICUs. Only 21 % of ICUs have a written local procedure for PR use. In the European PRICE study (566 patients, 34 ICUs, 9 countries), the frequency of PR use varied from 0% to 100%.
The benefit of PR is not clearly established and PR could also be deleterious in this context. First, PR may leave patients with moderate to extremely stressful memory. Second, there is no demonstrated relationship between the PR rates and self-removal of medical devices. Finally, there is a complex relationship between agitation, PR use and delirium. While PR is prescribed to avoid potential risks associated with agitation, it seems to favor delirium. Delirium is a serious event in ICU patients that is independently associated with adverse outcomes in patients receiving MV. Moreover, the number of days of ICU delirium is significantly associated with increased 1-year mortality and long-term cognitive impairment in survivors.
The R2D2-ICU study will be a prospective, parallel-group, open label, multicenter (6 centers) randomized controlled trial. All consecutive eligible patients will be included. Patients will be randomly assigned (1/1 ratio) to either systematic PR use (systematic use group) or restrictive PR use (restrictive use group). Patients in the restrictive PR group will be subjected to PR only in case of severe agitation defined by a RASS ≥ +3. Physical restraint will consist of wrist straps. In both groups, patients will receive standardized management for analgesia, sedation, delirium detection, weaning and early mobilization according to current guidelines. Concealment will be obtained using a computer-generated randomization scheme of various-sized blocks stratified by center, age (< or ≥ 65 years) and coma at the beginning of invasive mechanical ventilation (D0)) through a centralized 24h/24h internet service. Investigation blinded to group assignment is not feasible. In both arms, patients' arousal will be evaluated twice a day until day 14 with the use of RASS. Patients with a RASS of -5 or -4 will be considered comatose (and will not be assessed for delirium). Patients with a RASS score ≥ -3 will be assessed for delirium with the use of the CAM-ICU scale twice a day.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Systematic use group | Active Comparator |
| |
| Restrictive use group | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Systematic use group | Other | Patients in this group will be subjected to initial systematic PR, which will be re-evaluated every day every day between day 0 and day 14 |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| number of delirium-free days during the first 14 days (D14) after randomization (D0) measured by Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) | to assess whether a restrictive use of PR, in comparison to a systematic use, decreases delirium duration during the first 14 days (D14) after randomization (D0) | 14 days |
| Number of coma free days during the first 14 days (D14) after randomization (D0) measured by RASS score | 14 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of days on delirium until ICU discharge | up to 90 days | |
| Proportion of positive CAM-ICU/total number of CAM-ICU performed until ICU discharge | up to 90 days | |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria :
Exclusion criteria :
Patients meeting one of the following criteria will not be considered for inclusion:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Romain Sonneville, MD, PhD | Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard | Paris | 75018 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38631841 | Result | Sonneville R, Couffignal C, Sigaud F, Godard V, Audibert J, Contou D, Celier A, Djibre M, Schmidt J, Jaquet P, Mekontso Dessap A, Bourel C, Bellot R, Roy C, Lamara F, Essardy F, Timsit JF, Cornic R, Bouadma L; R2D2-ICU investigators. Restrictive use of Restraints and Delirium Duration in the Intensive Care Unit (R2D2-ICU): protocol for a French multicentre parallel-group open-label randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 17;14(4):e083414. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083414. | |
| 41841304 |
Not provided
Not provided
AP-HP Data Sharing Policy Data are available upon reasonable request. The procedures carried out with the French data privacy authority (CNIL, Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés) and the european regulation (GDPR) do not provide for the transmission of the database, nor do the information and consent documents signed by the patients. Consultation by the editorial board or interested researchers of individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article after deidentification may nevertheless be considered, subject to prior determination of the terms and conditions of such consultation and in respect for compliance with the applicable regulations.
Not provided
For all inquiries, please contact the following : drc-secretariat-promotion@aphp.fr
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Restrictive use group | Other | Patients in this group will be subjected to PR only in case of severe agitation, defined by a RASS ≥ +3 on any given day between day 0 and day 14 |
|
| percentage of patients with at least one day of delirium (positive CAM-ICU) between Day0-Day14 |
| 14 days |
| Number of days alive with agitation (RASS score ≥ +2) between Day0-Day14 | 14 days |
| Total cumulative dose of analgesics infusion between Day0-Day14 | 14 days |
| Total cumulative dose of sedatives infusion between Day0-Day14 | 14 days |
| Total cumulative dose of antipsychotics infusion between Day0-Day14 | 14 days |
| Total cumulative dose of dexmedetomidine infusion between Day0-Day14 | 14 days |
| Invasive mechanical ventilation-free hours between Day0-Day14 | 14 days |
| Median of Mobilisation capacity and rate of patients > 2 on a visual scale (SOMS) ranging from 0 (no mobilisation) to 4 (ambulation) between Day0- Day14 | 14 days |
| Rate of patients with at least one self-extubation or any device removal between Day0-Day14 | 14 days |
| Rate of patients with pressor ulcer on the wrists and with other bedsores and their severity according to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel between Day0-Day14 (at least one ulcer of grade III or IV per patient) | 14 days |
| Number of days of ICU stay | up to 90 days |
| Number of days of hospital stay | up to 90 days |
| Death rate during ICU stay stay | up to 90 days |
| Death rate during and hospital stay | up to 90 days |
| Rate of patients with at D90 an altered cognitive capabilities defined as a MMSE (Mini Mental State Examination) ≤ 24 points | at day 90 |
| Rate of patients with a frontal syndrome defined as a FAB (Frontal Assessment Battery at Bedside) < 15 points | at day 90 |
| Rate of patients with a possible diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) defined as a R-IES (Revised-Impact of events scale) ≥ 33 points | at day 90 |
| Rate of patients with a functional disability defined as a GOS-E (Glasgow Outcome Scale - Extended) ≤ 6 points | at day 90 |
| Functional independence status (yes or no) evaluated by the FIM (functional independence measurement) scale | at day 90 |
| Result |
| Sonneville R, Couffignal C, Sigaud F, Thy M, Godard V, Audibert J, Contou D, Celier A, Djibre M, Rambaud T, Jaquet P, Mekontso Dessap A, Bourel C, Belot R, Roy C, Nait Sidenas F, Essardy F, Timsit JF, Cornic R, Bouadma L; R2D2-ICU Investigator Study Group. Restrictive vs Liberal Physical Restraint Strategies in Critically Ill Patients: The R2D2-ICU Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2026 Apr 14;335(14):1232-1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2026.2897. |