Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Fundus imaging has become an integral tool in retinal diagnosis. Although single-field fundus photography covers a vital region of the retina, it leaves a large portion of the periphery undiscovered.
Ultra-wide-field imaging systems allowed for visualization of peripheral perfusion abnormalities in myopic eyes that were previously unknown.
In Austria, there are two different wide-field imaging systems available. The first device on the market was the Optos (Optos PLC, Dunfermline, UK) and several years later the Clarus 500 (Carl Zeiss, Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) was introduced.
While both of the studied imaging systems have the possibility of a 200° view of the retina, we would asses if the differences between the two devices affect the extent of retinal periphery view and if ocular ametropies which come with different retinal pathologies would affect the retinal periphery assessment.
Aim: To compare two CE-marked imaging systems concerning the extent of retinal periphery area viewing.
We would like to perform a prospective observational study that would include patients divided into three groups: myopic patients, hyperopic and emmetropic patients.
Fundus photography will be performed using two ultra-wide-field imaging systems (Optos, Daytona, Optos PLC, Dunfermline, UK and Clarus, 500 Carl Zeiss, Meditec AG, Jena, Germany), performed by the same investigator.
All images with sufficient quality will be exported and saved to hard-disk. The difference in periphery view will be investigated as follows: two retinal photos for each patient will be imported into Photoshop CS6 image-editing system (Adobe, version 13.0.0) where the anatomical landmarks will be matched for each image and the borders will be compared to see if there are differences in retinal periphery area viewing between the two devices.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extent of retinal periphery area viewing | Other | For the 30 patients fundus photography will be performed using two ultra-wide-field imaging systems. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| extent of retinal area viewing Optos, Daytona, Optos PLC, Dunfermline, UK | Device | Comparison of the extent of retinal periphery view between two wide field imaging devices. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| difference in retinal periphery viewing between the two devices | Extent of retinal periphery area viewing (the difference in periphery area between the two devices). Images of the same patients will be compared to determine the degree of periphery viewing for the two devices. | 7 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oliver Findl, Prof. | Contact | +43 1 91021-84611 | oliver@findl.at | |
| Nino Hirnschall, MD, PhD | Contact | +43 1 91021-84611 | nino@hirnschall.at |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Oliver Findl, Prof. | VIROS, Hanusch Hospital Vienna | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), Hanusch Hospital Vienna | Recruiting | Vienna | 1140 | Austria |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012164 | Retinal Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| extent of retinal area viewing Clarus, 500 Carl Zeiss, Meditec AG, Jena, Germany | Device | Comparison of the extent of retinal periphery view between two wide field imaging devices. |
|