Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to assess the benefits of a painless lancing device among diabetes subjects in improving self-monitoring frequency and HbA1c compared to the conventional lancing device.
Self-monitoring of glucose forms the cornerstone of diabetes management. There are multiple limiting factors towards efficient self- monitoring of blood glucose, including cost barriers, inconvenience, investment of time, pain associated with pricking etc. Pain has perceived as a major impediment to the self-monitoring of blood glucose.
Genteel lancing device offers a painless pricking experience and hence helps to report blood sugar values at least 4 times a day. The perceived pain sensitivity of the study subjects would be assessed using the 4- point pain screening questionnaire during the course of the study.
The aim of this study is to gather information on the percentage reduction in HbA1c values in diabetes patients as compared to the baseline values after three months and six months respectively brought about by percentage SMBG adherence, defined as the percentage of total recorded SMBG values as compared to the ideal number of readings over the 24-week period. SMBG adherence = actual number of fingerpricks (6 times daily in type 1 subjects or twice weekly in type 2 subjects).
SMBG adherence can be provisionally attained by multiple pricking using painless Genteel lancing device compared to the conventional lancing device. Additionally, the subject is asked about the likelihood they would use the device if available for routine SMBG practice in the future.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genteel arm | Experimental | In the Genteel arm, the subjects exclusively use the Genteel device for the first 12 weeks, and then switch to the conventional method of SMBG for an additional 12 weeks. This arm will use Butterfly Touch Lancets (BTL) throughout the study. |
|
| Conventional arm | Active Comparator | In the Conventional arm, the subjects use the conventional method of SMBG for the first 12 weeks and then switch to the Genteel device for an additional 12 weeks. This arm will use the lancet and lancing device which they were using prior to randomization to the study. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genteel lancing device | Device | Painless lancing device that helps to improve and assess self-monitoring frequency and HbA1c respectively |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage SMBG adherence | Percentage SMBG adherence, defined as the percentage of total recorded SMBG values as compared to the ideal number of readings over the 24-week period.SMBG adherence = actual number of fingerpricks/ ideal number of fingerpricks(6 times daily in type 1 subjects or twice weekly in type 2 subjects). Should be assessed both at baseline and end of 24 weeks. | 24 weeks |
| Percentage reduction in HbA1c | 2) Percentage reduction in the HbA1c values as compared to the baseline values at 12 weeks and 24 weeks. | 24 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Subjective assessment of pain reduction after using Genteel | The subject's Subjective Assessment of pain after using the Genteel device in comparison to conventional SMBG devices would be recorded using a pain scale. The scale for pain sensation is as follows:
The above values are computed relative to the worst pain the subject can think of at a score of 6. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jothydev Kesavadev, MD | Jothydev's Diabetes Research Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jothydev's Diabetes Research Center | Trivandrum | Kerala | 695032 | India |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Result | R. Warrier, S. Badarudeen, A. Shankar, G. Krishnan, L. Ramachandran, K. Thampiraj, S. Jothydev, J. Kesavadev. Assessing the Benefits of a Painless Lancing Device in a Subset of Patients Fearful of Finger Pricking. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019. 21. A60-A61. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2023 | Apr 4, 2023 | 8 | ||
| Mar 28, 2024 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003922 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 |
| D003924 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Conventional lancing device | Device | Conventional lancing device |
|
| 24 weeks |
| Subjective assessment of probability of using Genteel for SMBG | The subject is asked about the likelihood they would use the device if available for routine SMBG practices in the future. Scale for predicting future (probability) use of device for SMBG is as follows:
The above values are computed relative to the worst probability this device would not be used in future at a score of 5. | 24 weeks |
| Apr 23, 2024 |
| 9 |
| Oct 4, 2024 | Oct 28, 2024 | 10 |
| Feb 20, 2025 | Feb 20, 2025 | 11 |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |