Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the current work is to assess the efficiency and success rate of endodiathermy probe followed by intubation in children more than 2 years compared to the success rate of intubation (as a standard method) which varies from 75% to 85% in several studies
The study will be conducted on children above 2 year and will be divided randomly into two groups:
Group (I): 80 eyes of children suffer from congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction will have probing with metal probe and then intubation with bicanlicular silicon tube.
Group (II): 80 eyes of children suffer from congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction will have probing with endodiathermy probe and then intubation with bicanlicular silicon tube
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| classic intubation | Active Comparator | children suffer from congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction will have probing with metal probe and then intubation with bicanlicular silicon tube. |
|
| endodiathermy probe | Active Comparator | children suffer from congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction will have probing with endodiathermy probe and then intubation with bicanlicular silicon tube |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endodiathermy Probe and Intubation Versus Intubation | Procedure | children suffer from congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction will have probing with endodiathermy probe and then intubation with bicanlicular silicon tube |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| recanalization of nasolacrimal duct | compare the efficiency of endodiathermy probe followed by intubation versus probing with metal probe followed by intubation by
| 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| complication | Record any complication in two procedures as tube migration, tube extrusion, infection or need for additional procedure. | 6 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mohamed hafez ibrahim | Contact | 00201224010523 | monsieur84@yahoo.com | |
| karim elessawy | Contact | 00201144008882 | kemos1984@yahoo.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| tamer gawdat, professor | professor of ophthalmology cairo university | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abo El Resh Pedriatric Hospital Cairo University | Recruiting | Cairo | 31111 | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25370408 | Result | Suranagi PV, Poornima MS; Smruthi; Banagar B. Regarding a novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;62(9):971. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.143956. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
after finishiny my research can share my data
1 year untill 1 year and 6 months
after finish my study
Not provided
Not provided
Group (I): 80 eyes of children suffer from congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction will have probing with metal probe and then intubation with bicanlicular silicon tube.
Group (II): 80 eyes of children suffer from congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction will have probing with endodiathermy probe and then intubation with bicanlicular silicon tube.
Not provided
Not provided
all will be know the surgical procedure but participant will know only that he will be treated but cant understand type of procedure done