Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study compares the time taken to intubate between Cmac video laryngoscopy with Glidescope video laryngoscopy in paediatric patients aged 3-12 years old.
This study aims to determine whether are both devices comparable to each other in terms of intubation time and Cormack Lehane view in paediatric patients with normal airway undergoing elective surgery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-Mac intubation | Active Comparator | Intubation with C-MAC video laryngoscopy |
|
| Glidescope intubation | Active Comparator | Intubation with Glidescope video laryngoscopy |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glidescope video laryngoscopy/ C-MAC video laryngoscopy | Device | usage of said devices according to manual |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Intubation time | Time taken from insertion of specified laryngoscope blade to lip until presence of capnography tracing | 5 minutes |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cormack Lehane view | grade from 1-4 by operator's assesment | 5 minutes |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Additional maneuvre to assist intubation | i.e external laryngeal manipulation, bougie assisted | 5 minutes |
| adverse events | i.e lip injury, desaturations |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Syarifah Noor Nazihah Sayed Masri, MD | Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia | Kuala Lumpur | 56000 | Malaysia |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19128325 | Background | Holm-Knudsen RJ, Rasmussen LS. Paediatric airway management: basic aspects. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Jan;53(1):1-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01794.x. | |
| 20402873 | Background | Armstrong J, John J, Karsli C. A comparison between the GlideScope Video Laryngoscope and direct laryngoscope in paediatric patients with difficult airways - a pilot study. Anaesthesia. 2010 Apr;65(4):353-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06294.x. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
GlideScope intubation Vs Cmac intubation
Not provided
Not provided
Randomization
| 5 minutes |
| 23374414 | Background | Mosier J, Chiu S, Patanwala AE, Sakles JC. A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope to the C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;61(4):414-420.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.11.001. Epub 2013 Jan 30. |
| 20528838 | Background | Hurford DM, White MC. A comparison of the Glidescope and Karl Storz DCI videolaryngoscopes in a paediatric manikin. Anaesthesia. 2010 Aug;65(8):781-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06390.x. Epub 2010 Jun 2. |
| 18689807 | Background | Kim JT, Na HS, Bae JY, Kim DW, Kim HS, Kim CS, Kim SD. GlideScope video laryngoscope: a randomized clinical trial in 203 paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Oct;101(4):531-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen234. Epub 2008 Aug 8. |