Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Opera CRO, a TIGERMED Group Company | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Auralya® is a sterile, injectable, non-pyrogenic, re-absorbable medical product made of reticulated hyaluronic acid of non-animal origin, produced via bacterial fermentation.
To evaluate the overall safety of the medical device and performance of Auralya® dermal filler in terms of absolute change of WSRS score (Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale) assessed by Investigator at 8 and 12 weeks after the initiation of treatment, compared to Baseline Visit (day 0).
Minimally invasive procedures (injectable dermal fillers) are among the techniques preferred by an increasing number of specialists in Aesthetics due to their clinical performance regarding volume restoration, and favourable safety profile.
During January - March 2018, it was performed a review of the scientific literature to find similar investigations to determine the minimal clinical significant difference between Baseline and a period of 30 days after the end the treatment.
In a similar dermal filler study, Takanobu Mashiko et al used a 5-grade WSRS and showed that, at 4 weeks after treatment, they achieved a 1.7 ± 0.5 (mean ± SD) improvement between those visits.
Considering the exploratory nature of this study and the fact that this investigation is first in-human, we choose to take a 0.5 WSRS decrease, at 90 days from the treatment start, as a minimal clinically significant difference. The standard deviation considered for the sample size calculation was set at 0.8 WSRS points.
By using a one-sided Wilcoxon Signed-rank test (matched pairs), a significance level of 0.05 and a power of 0.95 (probability of finding an effect when there is one), we calculated a total sample size of 31 subjects.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auralya | Experimental | Auralya® 25 (Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid) Injection |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auralya | Device | Hyaluronic Acid-Dermal Filler |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate safety and performance of Auralya | To evaluate the overall safety of the medical device and performance of Auralya® dermal filler in terms of absolute change of Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale assessed by Investigator at 8 and 12 weeks after the initiation of treatment, compared to Baseline Visit (day 0). | 12 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change of Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale | Absolute change of WSRS score assessed by the subject at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline Visit (day 0). | 12 weeks |
| General appearance after treatment |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mihaela Fratila, MD | SCM Dr. Rosu | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCM Dr. Rosu | Timișoara | Timiș County | 300425 | Romania |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20844296 | Background | Fitzgerald R, Graivier MH, Kane M, Lorenc ZP, Vleggaar D, Werschler WP, Kenkel JM. Update on facial aging. Aesthet Surg J. 2010 Jul-Aug;30 Suppl:11S-24S. doi: 10.1177/1090820X10378696. | |
| 25081082 | Background | Sudha PN, Rose MH. Beneficial effects of hyaluronic acid. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2014;72:137-176. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800269-8.00009-9. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This trial is open label, multi-center, non-randomized single group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
General appearance after treatment assessed by the subject at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after the first treatment session compared to Baseline Visit (day 0) using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
| 12 weeks |
| Subject satisfaction | Subject satisfaction assessed at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks, through Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire completed by the subject providing their degree of satisfaction with the treatment on a three-point scale (very satisfied, satisfied, or not satisfied) | 12 weeks |
| Global evaluation of product performance | Global evaluation of product performance by Investigator with photos taken at each visit. The photos will be compared in the final visit (week 12) | 12 weeks |
| Product safety | Global evaluation of product safety by Investigator and by the patient using Patient Global Assessment of Safety questionnaire | 12 weeks |
| 27274627 | Background | Kim BW, Moon IJ, Yun WJ, Chung BY, Kim SD, Lee GY, Chang SE. A Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Split-Face Comparison Study of the Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Mannitol Containing Monophasic Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds. Ann Dermatol. 2016 Jun;28(3):297-303. doi: 10.5021/ad.2016.28.3.297. Epub 2016 May 25. |
| 25821787 | Background | Kopera D, Palatin M, Bartsch R, Bartsch K, O'Rourke M, Holler S, Baumgartner RR, Prinz M. An open-label uncontrolled, multicenter study for the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the dermal filler Princess VOLUME in the treatment of nasolabial folds. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:195328. doi: 10.1155/2015/195328. Epub 2015 Mar 3. |
| 25964628 | Background | Few J, Cox SE, Paradkar-Mitragotri D, Murphy DK. A Multicenter, Single-Blind Randomized, Controlled Study of a Volumizing Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Midface Volume Deficit: Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years. Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Jul;35(5):589-99. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv050. Epub 2015 May 11. |
| 23687448 | Background | Callan P, Goodman GJ, Carlisle I, Liew S, Muzikants P, Scamp T, Halstead MB, Rogers JD. Efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid filler in subjects treated for correction of midface volume deficiency: a 24 month study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013 Mar 20;6:81-9. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S40581. Print 2013. |
| 28040813 | Background | Dong J, Gantz M, Goldenberg G. Efficacy and safety of new dermal fillers. Cutis. 2016 Nov;98(5):309-313. |
| 25926750 | Background | De Boulle K, Heydenrych I. Patient factors influencing dermal filler complications: prevention, assessment, and treatment. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015 Apr 15;8:205-14. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S80446. eCollection 2015. |
| 27621659 | Background | Rivkin AZ. Volume correction in the aging hand: role of dermal fillers. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Aug 30;9:225-32. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S92853. eCollection 2016. |
| 27799807 | Background | Kuhne U, Esmann J, von Heimburg D, Imhof M, Weissenberger P, Sattler G. Safety and performance of cohesive polydensified matrix hyaluronic acid fillers with lidocaine in the clinical setting - an open-label, multicenter study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Oct 20;9:373-381. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S115256. eCollection 2016. |
| 23190816 | Background | Lorenc ZP, Bank D, Kane M, Lin X, Smith S. Validation of a four-point photographic scale for the assessment of midface volume loss and/or contour deficiency. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Dec;130(6):1330-1336. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826d9fa6. |
| 10231509 | Background | Chen WY, Abatangelo G. Functions of hyaluronan in wound repair. Wound Repair Regen. 1999 Mar-Apr;7(2):79-89. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.1999.00079.x. |
| 21779421 | Background | McCall-Perez F, Stephens TJ, Herndon JH Jr. Efficacy and tolerability of a facial serum for fine lines, wrinkles, and photodamaged skin. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011 Jul;4(7):51-4. |
| 22759252 | Background | Rzany B, Cartier H, Kestemont P, Trevidic P, Sattler G, Kerrouche N, Dhuin JC, Ma YM. Full-face rejuvenation using a range of hyaluronic acid fillers: efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction over 6 months. Dermatol Surg. 2012 Jul;38(7 Pt 2):1153-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02470.x. |
| 20725567 | Background | Van Dyke S, Hays GP, Caglia AE, Caglia M. Severe Acute Local Reactions to a Hyaluronic Acid-derived Dermal Filler. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010 May;3(5):32-5. |
| 25730536 | Background | Funt D, Pavicic T. Dermal fillers in aesthetics: an overview of adverse events and treatment approaches. Plast Surg Nurs. 2015 Jan-Mar;35(1):13-32. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000087. |
| 23125964 | Background | Bhatt A. Protocol deviation and violation. Perspect Clin Res. 2012 Jul;3(3):117. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.100663. No abstract available. |
| 27453830 | Background | Ghooi RB, Bhosale N, Wadhwani R, Divate P, Divate U. Assessment and classification of protocol deviations. Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):132-6. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.184817. |
| 20078098 | Background | Yeom J, Bhang SH, Kim BS, Seo MS, Hwang EJ, Cho IH, Park JK, Hahn SK. Effect of cross-linking reagents for hyaluronic acid hydrogel dermal fillers on tissue augmentation and regeneration. Bioconjug Chem. 2010 Feb 17;21(2):240-7. doi: 10.1021/bc9002647. |
| 23750828 | Background | Jiang LI, Stephens TJ, Goodman R. SWIRL, a clinically validated, objective, and quantitative method for facial wrinkle assessment. Skin Res Technol. 2013 Nov;19(4):492-8. doi: 10.1111/srt.12073. Epub 2013 Jun 10. |
| 27042135 | Background | Stephens TJ, Sigler ML, Herndon JH Jr, Dispensa L, Le Moigne A. A placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of Imedeen((R)) Time Perfection((R)) for improving the appearance of photodamaged skin. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Mar 15;9:63-70. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S98787. eCollection 2016. |
| 11711957 | Background | Lemperle G, Holmes RE, Cohen SR, Lemperle SM. A classification of facial wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Nov;108(6):1735-50; discussion 1751-2. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200111000-00048. |