Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Schulthess Klinik | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The current guidelines for non-specific CLBP, recommend a conservative approach with exercise therapy, as first line treatment. Endurance and resistance training are two examples of recommended exercise therapies. However, it appears that none is recommended as superior over the other.
The lack of studies using HIIT in CLBP subjects, is the reason why it is needed to conduct an investigation about its effects.
However, firstly it is needed to assess the feasibility and safety of the HIIT protocol, to integrate it in the daily practise and future research.
In a single-center, single-blinded randomized feasiblity study, the investigators aim to prove the feasibility and safety of a 12 week HIIT programm.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| MICT | Active Comparator |
| |
| HIIT | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIIT | Other |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Adherence | Difference in training adherence rate between HIIT and MICT. The adherence rate will be calculated in the amount of days a patient trained versus the total days they were scheduled to train. | 13 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Enjoyability | Likert scale from -3 to +3. -3 = I hate it, 0 = Neutral, +3 = I enjoy it. | 13 week |
| Willingness to continue the training | Likert scale from -3 to +3. -3 = Very low, 0 = Neutral, +3 = Very high. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Oswestry disability index | The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire examines the perceived level of disability in the everyday activities of daily living. 0% to 20% = Minimal disability; 21% to 40% = Moderate disability; 41% to 60% = Severe disability; 61% to 80% = crippled; 81% to 100%. | 13 weeks |
| Numeric Pain Rate Scale |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schulthess Klinik | Zurich | 8008 | Switzerland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35491417 | Derived | Cerini T, Hilfiker R, Riegler TF, Felsch QTM. 12 weeks high intensity interval training versus moderate intensity continuous training in chronic low back pain subjects: a randomised single-blinded feasibility study. Arch Physiother. 2022 May 2;12(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40945-022-00136-3. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017116 | Low Back Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001416 | Back Pain |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000072696 | High-Intensity Interval Training |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D064797 | Physical Conditioning, Human |
| D015444 | Exercise |
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| D009068 | Movement |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| MICT | Other |
|
|
|
| 13 weeks |
| Number of Adverse Events & Dropout rate | Dropout rate and adverse events connected with the training | 13 weeks |
| Recruited rate | Screened patients in relation with the number of recruited patients | 3 months |
Pain score from 0 to 10. 0 = No pain, 5 = Moderate pain, 10 = Worst possible pain. |
| 13 weeks |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D009142 |
| Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena |
| D055687 | Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena |