Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Colorado State University | OTHER |
| University of Minnesota | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary purpose of this study is to assess whether consuming foods from animals raised with antimicrobial medications influences gut health in adults between the ages of 21-69 years old. Antimicrobial medications are commonly used to help animals avoid infections while growing.
The researchers plan to investigate differences in the resistome (i.e., populations of antimicrobial resistance genes) and microbiome (populations of bacteria) in feces obtained from people when they consume diets containing beef derived from cattle raised conventionally (i.e. using antimicrobial drugs(AMDs)) vs. those produced in raised without antibiotics (RWA) systems. In addition, the researchers will investigate whether specific antimicrobial resistant (AMR) genes are transmitted from food to people.
The hypothesis is that beef is not a significant source of resistant bacteria, and there is no difference in the likelihood of gut colonization with resistant bacteria in people eating beef derived from cattle raised conventionally (i.e. using AMDs) vs. those eating beef produced in RWA systems.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled diet with beef raised without antibiotics | Active Comparator | Subjects will be randomized and assigned to consume the U.S. Healthy Diet Diets with beef produced in RWA (raised without antibiotics) systems for three weeks. |
|
| Controlled diet with beef produced in conventional systems | Experimental | Subjects will be randomized and assigned to consume the U.S. Healthy Diet Diets with beef produced in conventional systems for three weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled diet with beef raised without antibiotics | Other | The controlled diet with beef raised without antibiotics will follow the Dietary Guidelines for American's recommendations. All foods and beverages will be provided during intervention to achieve the desired eating pattern. Beef included in this diet were raised without antibiotics. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Differences in the resistome and microbiome | The resistome and microbiome of rinsates will be obtained from dietary components, and feces collected from the particpants. Researchers will sequence all of the published AMR genes. Microbiome data will be obtained from 16s rRNA gene sequencing to produce amplicons of the V4 region of 16S rRNA genes. Statistical analyses will be conducted of microbial features to assess whether microbial/resistome communities diverge between the two groups. Additionally, foodborne transmission of AMR genes with discriminatory SNP("DNA fingerprints") profiles will be investigated through the food chain into dietary trial participants to identify highly discriminatory patterns in individual genes, or discriminatory profiles in gene sets. Hypothesis: beef is not a significant source of resistant bacteria and there is no difference in the likelihood of gut colonization with resistant bacteria in people eating beef derived from cattle raised conventionally vs beef produced in RWA systems | 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Level of fasting blood pressure | The hypothesis is that there is no difference in blood pressure in people eating beef derived from cattle raised conventionally vs. those eating beef produced in RWA systems. | 2 years |
| Level of fasting serum insulin |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Questionnaire score of mood and health and well being | The POMS (Profile of Mood States) Questionnaire is a psychological rating scale to assess distinct mood states. There is a total of 35 questions using a five point scale ranging from "not at all" to "extremely" indicating the range of mood swings over a period of time. The Optum SF-36v2 (Short Form 36 question Version 2) Health Survey measures the functional health and wellbeing of a participant. SF-36v2 consists of eight scaled scores which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is transformed into a 0-100 scales, with the assumption that each questions carries equal weight (the lower the score the more disability, the higher the score the less disability). The hypothesis is that there is no difference in mood and health and wellbeing in people eating beef derived from cattle raised conventionally vs. those eating beef produced in RWA systems. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Wayne W Campbell, PhD | Purdue University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dept. Foods and Nutrition, Purdue University | West Lafayette | Indiana | 47907 | United States |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000900 | Anti-Bacterial Agents |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000890 | Anti-Infective Agents |
| D045506 | Therapeutic Uses |
| D020228 | Pharmacologic Actions |
| D020164 | Chemical Actions and Uses |
Not provided
Not provided
This is a 16-week randomized, cross-over, controlled, blinded study. During weeks 2 and 9, participants usual, unrestricted dietary intakes will be assessed. At week 3 the participants will be randomized and assigned to consume either the controlled U.S. Healthy Eating Pattern with beef produced in conventional systems or to an identical controlled U.S. Healthy Eating Patter with beef produced in RWA (raised without antibiotics) systems. Week 10 will be the second 3- week long dietary intervention period. A total of 14 stool samples will be collected during the study (two after baseline, washout 1 and washout 2, and 4 during the two dietary interventions). Two fasting state serum samples and a psychological questionnaire will be collected during study weeks 2, 5, 9, and 12.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Controlled diet with beef produced in conventional systems | Other | The controlled diet with beef raised without antibiotics will follow the Dietary Guidelines for American's recommendations. All foods and beverages will be provided during intervention to achieve the desired eating pattern. Beef included in this diet were raised with antibiotics. |
|
The hypothesis is that there is no difference in fasting serum insulin in people eating beef derived from cattle raised conventionally vs. those eating beef produced in RWA systems.
| 2 years |
| Level of fasting serum glucose | The hypothesis is that there is no difference in fasting serum glucose in people eating beef derived from cattle raised conventionally vs. those eating beef produced in RWA systems. | 2 years |
| Size of lipoprotein particle | The hypothesis is that there is no difference in lipoprotein particle size in people eating beef derived from cattle raised conventionally vs. those eating beef produced in RWA systems | 2 years |
| 2 years |