Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In collaboration with community partners, we determined that the reading level required for the intervention did not make it suitable for the adolescents.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Sangath | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The overall aim of this project is to understand if single-session interventions are acceptable, culturally appropriate, and effective for Indian adolescents attending a rural, low-resource government school. The investigators will be examining the effects of a computerized intervention on the well-being and mental health of adolescents. The investigators hypothesize that the intervention will yield statistically significant improvements in wellbeing and mental health relative to a study skills control condition.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental |
| |
| Study Skills Control | Sham Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth, Gratitude, & Positive Activities | Behavioral | Reading and writing activities based on growth (designed to instill the belief that people can change), gratitude (noticing and appreciating good things in life), and behavioral activation (identifying and scheduling positive activities). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale | Well-being questionnaire. Total score ranges from 14 to 70. Higher values indicate a better outcome. | Baseline, 4 week follow-up, 12 week follow-up |
| Intervention Appropriateness Measure | Questionnaire measuring the appropriateness of an intervention. Appropriateness refers to the perceived fit or relevance of an intervention. The total score ranges from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate a better outcome. | Immediately post-intervention (i.e., 0 weeks) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Health Questionnaire-9 | Depression Questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 27. Lower scores indicate a better outcome. | Baseline, 4 week follow-up, 12 week follow-up |
| Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener-7 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Rob DeRubeis, PhD | University of Pennsylvania | Study Director |
| Sachin Shinde, PhD | Sangath | Study Director |
| Sadhana Natu, PhD | Modern College Pune | Study Director |
| Akash Wasil | University of Pennsylvania | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z P school, Wablewadi | Pune | Maharashtra | India |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003863 | Depression |
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006128 | Growth |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D048788 | Growth and Development |
| D010829 | Physiological Phenomena |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Study Skills Control | Behavioral | Reading and writing activities designed to teach evidence-based study strategies. |
|
Anxiety Questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 21. Lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Anxiety Questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 21. Lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Anxiety Questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 21. Lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Anxiety Questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 21. Lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Anxiety Questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 21. Lower scores indicate a better outcome.
| Baseline, 4 week follow-up, 12 week follow-up |
| The EPOCH Measure of Adolescent Well-being | Questionnaire with five subscales measuring engagement, perseverance, optimism, connectedness, and happiness. Each subscale score ranges from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate a better outcome. The happiness and optimism subscales will be used as secondary outcomes for this trial. A total score is not computed. | Baseline, 4 week follow-up, 12 week follow-up |
| Acceptability of Intervention Measure | Questionnaire measuring the acceptability of an intervention. Acceptability refers to the perception that a given treatment is agreeable or satisfactory. The total score ranges from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate a better outcome. | Immediately post-intervention (i.e., 0 weeks) |
| Feasibility of Intervention Measure | Questionnaire measuring the feasibility of an intervention. Feasibility refers to the degree to which a treatment can be successfully implemented in a given setting. The total score ranges from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate a better outcome. | Immediately post-intervention (i.e., 0 weeks) |
| Perceived Stress Scale-4 | Questionnaire measuring perceived stress. The total score ranges from 0 to 16. Lower scores indicate a better outcome. | Time Frame: Baseline, 4 week follow-up, 12 week follow-up |