Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
this multi-center prospective cohort study is to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of drug-eluting bead TACE compared with conventional TACE in terms of objective response in unresectable HCC
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEB-TACE | Experimental | 172 subjects in this study group will be receive the treatment of drug-eluting bead TACE |
|
| cTACE | Active Comparator | 172 subjects in this study group will be receive the treatment of conventional TACE |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEB-TACE | Procedure | Patients in the DEB-TACE group received a maximum dose of 4 ml of DC bead (diameter 75-500 um) loaded with a maximum dose of 150 mg of anthracyclines drugs, such as doxorubicin. The anticancer agents and the diameter of DC Bead for individual patient will be selected according to the common clinical practice of each center. Treatment endpoint consisted of stasis of flow within feeding vessel(s) or completed delivery of maximum single-session dose of 150 mg doxorubicin. TACE will be repeated "on demand" according to the radiological response. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Objective response rate | the percentage of patients who achieved complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) as the best response, according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (mRECIST) criteria | Tumor response will be assessed at week 4 and week 12 after initiation of treatment and thereafter every 8 weeks, up to 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall survival | Overall survival (OS) is measured from the treatment start until all-cause death or the last follow-up date | The last patient has been on study for 1year |
| Time to progression |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Prior informed consent
Confirmed Diagnosis of HCC: a. Cirrhotic subjects: Clinical diagnosis by American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) criteria. HCC can be defined in cirrhotic subjects by one imaging technique (CT scan, MRI, or second generation contrast ultrasound) showing a nodule larger than 2 cm with contrast uptake in the arterial phase and washout in venous or late phases or two imaging techniques showing this radiological behavior for nodules of 1-2 cm in diameter. Cytohistological confirmation is required for subjects who do not fulfill these eligibility criteria. b. Non-cirrhotic subjects: For subjects without cirrhosis, histological or cytological confirmation is mandatory. Documentation of original biopsy for diagnosis is acceptable
Patients with unresectable Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A and BCLC B, and all patients have a intermediate or high tumor burden (the diameter of largest tumor plus tumor number is more than 6)
Child Pugh class A/B(7) class without decompensated liver cirrhosis.
ECOG Performance Status 0 score
At least one uni-dimensional lesion measurable by MRI or CT according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria
Male or female subject larger than 18 years of age
Life expectance of at least 12 weeks.
Both men and women enrolled in this trial must use adequate barrier birth control measures during the course of the trial and 4 weeks after the completion of trial
Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function as assessed by central lab by means of the following laboratory requirements from samples within 7 days prior to randomization:
Exclusion Criteria:
Portal vein or any vascular invasion
Presence of extra hepatic spread
Presence of metastasis in biliary tract or obstruction of biliary tract
Presence of metastasis in brain or presence of symptom of the brain metastasis but lack of further examination to exclude brain metastasis
Poor blood supply for the liver tumor lesions; poor blood supply refers that the tumor lesions fail to show obvious contrast uptake in the arterial phase and washout in venous or late phases by CT scan or MRI
Any contraindications for hepatic embolization procedures:
History of cardiac disease:
Known history of HIV infection
Patients who have previously been receiving any treatments against HCC
Active clinically serious infections (> grade 2 NCI-CTCAE Version 4.0), except for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection
Contraindication of Anthracyclines administration, such as Doxorubicin
Concurrent with other cancer
Pregnant or breast-feeding subjects
Women of childbearing age did not take any contraceptive measures
Clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 12 weeks prior to start of study
Major surgery within 3 weeks prior to start of study drug (e.g. thoracolaparotomy is not allowed, but noninvasive surgery, e.g. biopsy, is allowed)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guohong Han, MD PHD | Contact | +86-2984771528 | hangh@fmmu.edu.cn | |
| Dongdong Xia, MD | Contact | +86-2984771528 | xiadongdong1026@163.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University | Xi'an | Shaanxi | 710032 | China |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| cTACE | Procedure | Patients in the cTACE group were treated with anthracyclines, such as doxorubicin, in a mixture of lipiodol. Administration of the anticancer in oil emulsion was followed by injection of embolic materials such as gelfoam or PVA particles until complete stasis in segmental or subsegmental arterial branches. the tumor-feeding vessels should be superselected whenever possible. The anticancer agents for individual patient will be selected according to the common clinical practice of each center. TACE will be repeated "on demand" according to the radiological response. |
|
|
Time to progression is measured from the treatment start to the radiologically confirmed progression
| The last patient has been on study for 1year |
| Adverse event | The terms and grade of adverse event will be present according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE version 4.0) | The adverse event will be assessed during in hospital and every 4 weeks, up to 1year |
| Progression-free survival | Progression-free survival (PFS) is measured from the treatment start until all-cause death or untreatable progression (vascular invasion, extra hepatic spread, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status >2, and Child-Pugh grade over C, but except hepatic new nodule) | The last patient has been on study for 1year |
| Time to response | Time to response (TTR) is measured from the treatment start to the firstly radiologically confirmed complete response or partial response. | The last patient has been on study for 1year |
| Duration of response | Duration of response (DOR) is measured from the first-time confirmed complete response or partial response to the date of radiological progression | The last patient has been on study for 1year |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006528 | Carcinoma, Hepatocellular |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000230 | Adenocarcinoma |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D008113 | Liver Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D008107 | Liver Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided