Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, TACE using Lipiodol/anti cancer agent emulsion is the standard treatment and reported as a significantly better treatment through randomized comparison study like Llovet, etc. than conservative treatment. Recently, doctors do transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting bead, and it is proved less side effect and better efficacy than conventional TACE using Lipiodol in Precision V study by Dr. Lammer, etc. But, it could not defined improved survival rate as expected. This study's purpose is evaluating treatment efficacy, survival rate and safety of TACE using drug eluting bead by comparing to conventional TACE using doxorubicin/Lipiodol emulsion for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Comparison Between Drug-Eluting Bead vs conventional TACE.
Drug-eluting bead group : TACE using DC bead loading Doxorubicin. Conventional TACE group : TACE using Doxorubicin/Lipiodol emulsion and gelatin sponge/PVA particle.
cTACE group was chosen by concurrent matched patients (age, sex, tumor stage, and Child-Pugh class are matched)
5.7 Technically considerable aspects of DC bead TACE group
Planned dose of doxorubicin. Each vial of DC Bead (2 ml of beads) should be loaded with 70-75 mg doxorubicin (loading dose, 35-37.5 mg doxorubicin / ml of beads).
Choice of DC Bead size. Use of 100-300μm beads is recommended for a standard procedure. However, individual patient and tumor characteristics, particularly the identification of arterio-venous shunting, should be taken into account when the safety of the treatment and the choice of DC Bead size are determined.
DC Bead dilution. Mix loaded DC Bead with a non-ionic contrast medium. At least 5-10 ml of non-ionic contrast should be used per 1 ml of DC Bead (i.e., 10-20 ml are required to dilute one vial of DC Bead) prior to injection.
Catheter positioning. A superselective (i.e., segmental or subsegmental) approach should be used whenever possible by using a microcatheter. Use of 3D / MPR obtained from C-arm rotational angiography with a flat-panel detector system (cone-beam CT) is recommended, if available, to improve the accuracy in identifying tumor-feeding arteries. Such imaging allows for accurate targeting of the tumor. In addition, repeat cone beam CT should be performed after successful delivery of the DC Bead to confirm adequate targeting and saturation of the tumor(s).
Injection. The injection must be very slow. An injection rate of 1 ml of the contrast agent - DC Bead suspension per minute is recommended. Thus, it takes 10-20 minutes to infusion 1 vial of DC bead. Care should be taken to avoid sedimentation of the beads in the syringe by rotating the syringes or using a 3-way stopcock to gently suspend the beads in the solution.
Embolisation endpoint. Injection should be continued until "near stasis" is observed in the artery directly feeding the tumor (i.e., the contrast the contrast column should clear within 2-5 heart beats). At that point, injection should be stopped - regardless of the amount of beads that have been actually administered - to avoid reflux of embolic material. Once the embolisation endpoint has been achieved, no additional embolic material should be injected. If the "near stasis" endpoint is not obtained after injection of the scheduled volume of beads, no additional embolization should be performed. This patient is likely to benefit from a second course after imaging follow-up.
extrahepatic collateral vessels. In principle, DC bead is used for collateral arterial circulation (inferior phrenic artery, internal mammary artery, intercostal artery), but doctors can do bland embolization (PVC particle, gelatin sponge) based on their judgement.
Repeated treatment. In principle, treatment with the same method is repeated for every 2 - 3 months as tumor progression is observed. But, even if tumor progression is not observed, the treatment can be repeated for tumor repression. If there is no tumor left, contrast enhancement CT or MRI can be performed for every 2- 3 months as follow up.
5.8. Dose in study Dose of DC bead, anti cancer agent for TACE dose is decided by tumor size. So, this study just set up the maximum dose.
Drug-eluting bead group DC bead : 2 bottles DC bead absorbs 70-75mg per bottle. Doxorubicin loading to DC bead needs to be done 1.5 hours before using. The size of DC bead is 100-300 micrometer, and it can be used up to 2 bottles.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| chemoembolization | Active Comparator | HCC patients received chemoembolization |
|
| Historical use of c-TACE using Lipiodiol and doxorubicin | Other | The control arm will be of the patients that have been treated historically in the centers with conventional TACE (that is Lipiodiol plus doxorubicin). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DebDox TACE | Procedure | HCC patients will receive chemoembolization (TACE) using DC beads containing Doxorubicin. The objective is to give 2 vials of DC Bead (2ml per vial) loaded with 70-75mg of Doxorubicin per vial (Each vial contain 2ml of DC Bead, thus doxorubicin concentration will be of 35-37.5mg per ml of DC Beads) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| tumor response | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| survival rate | 2 years | |
| Incidence rate and grade of side effect | 6months | |
| Time to progression |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with confirmed diagnosis of HCC as stated below
Patient with HCC not suitable for radical therapies such as resection, liver transplantation or percutaneous therapies or patient is indicated for these therapies but there is a contraindication for them or patient himself rejects above treatments and wants to do TACE (Indication for hepatectomy, liver transplantation, local ablation is decided by doctors of each center)
Multinodular or single nodular tumor over 5cm, (In the case of single nodule less than 5cm, if curative treatment is contraindicated or the patient rejects curative treatment)
Hypervascular lesion showing contrast enhancement in the early stage at the contrast media bolus injection CT or MRI.
At least one uni-dimensional lesion measurable according to the Modified RECIST criteria by CT-scan or MRI
No invasion in the blood vessel (hepatic portal, hepatic vein) or bile duct by the CT or MR
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status is 0 - 1
Child-Pugh classification is A or B7
Proper blood, liver, renal, heart function: testing result within 2 weeks from registry of this study is followed:
Over 20 years old
Expected survival more than 6 months
Patients who are willing to do regular visit, laboratory test, and radiological exam
Prior written patient consent
Exclusion Criteria:
ECOG performance status 2 or more, Child-Pugh class B8 or more
Diffuse HCC or presence of vascular or biliary invasion or extrahepatic spread.
Vascular or biliary invasion
Extrahepatic metastasis (Any lymph nodes measuring ≥ 10mm along the short axis)
Tumor burden involving more than 50% of the liver
Patients previously treated with any anti-cancer therapy for HCC except hepatic resection or early recurrence within 1 year after resection
Liver cancer rupture
History of biliary tract repair or endoscopic biliary tract treatment
Clinically important refractory ascites or pleural fluid
Any contraindications for hepatic embolization procedures
Any contraindication for doxorubicin administration
Contrast media allergy contraindicating angiography
Acute or active following diseases
Pregnant, nursing or childbearing age women and men who are actively sexually available and don't want to or can't do contraception
Safety concerns based on researcher's judge
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jin Wook Chung, MD | Seoul National University Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seoul National University Hospital | Seoul | 110-744 | South Korea |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20213741 | Background | Dhanasekaran R, Kooby DA, Staley CA, Kauh JS, Khanna V, Kim HS. Comparison of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and chemoembolization with doxorubicin drug eluting beads (DEB) for unresectable hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC). J Surg Oncol. 2010 May 1;101(6):476-80. doi: 10.1002/jso.21522. | |
| 19937027 | Background |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| efficacy of DEB in chemoembolization of HCC | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006528 | Carcinoma, Hepatocellular |
| D008113 | Liver Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000230 | Adenocarcinoma |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| 2 years |
| Time to untreatable progression | 2 years |
| Number of treatment required to achieve objective response | 6 months |
| Malagari K, Pomoni M, Kelekis A, Pomoni A, Dourakis S, Spyridopoulos T, Moschouris H, Emmanouil E, Rizos S, Kelekis D. Prospective randomized comparison of chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting beads and bland embolization with BeadBlock for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Jun;33(3):541-51. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9750-0. Epub 2009 Nov 24. |
| 21184228 | Background | Malagari K, Pomoni M, Spyridopoulos TN, Moschouris H, Kelekis A, Dourakis S, Alexopoulou E, Koskinas J, Angelopoulos M, Kornezos J, Pomoni A, Tandeles S, Marinis A, Rizos S, Kelekis D. Safety profile of sequential transcatheter chemoembolization with DC Bead: results of 237 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011 Aug;34(4):774-85. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-0044-3. Epub 2010 Dec 24. |
| 20097098 | Background | Nicolini A, Martinetti L, Crespi S, Maggioni M, Sangiovanni A. Transarterial chemoembolization with epirubicin-eluting beads versus transarterial embolization before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 Mar;21(3):327-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.10.038. Epub 2010 Jan 22. |
| 17627902 | Background | Poon RT, Tso WK, Pang RW, Ng KK, Woo R, Tai KS, Fan ST. A phase I/II trial of chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using a novel intra-arterial drug-eluting bead. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Sep;5(9):1100-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.04.021. Epub 2007 Jul 12. |
| 19908093 | Background | Lammer J, Malagari K, Vogl T, Pilleul F, Denys A, Watkinson A, Pitton M, Sergent G, Pfammatter T, Terraz S, Benhamou Y, Avajon Y, Gruenberger T, Pomoni M, Langenberger H, Schuchmann M, Dumortier J, Mueller C, Chevallier P, Lencioni R; PRECISION V Investigators. Prospective randomized study of doxorubicin-eluting-bead embolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: results of the PRECISION V study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Feb;33(1):41-52. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9711-7. Epub 2009 Nov 12. |
| 16890600 | Background | Takayasu K, Arii S, Ikai I, Omata M, Okita K, Ichida T, Matsuyama Y, Nakanuma Y, Kojiro M, Makuuchi M, Yamaoka Y; Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Prospective cohort study of transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in 8510 patients. Gastroenterology. 2006 Aug;131(2):461-9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.05.021. |
| 18477802 | Background | Llovet JM, Di Bisceglie AM, Bruix J, Kramer BS, Lencioni R, Zhu AX, Sherman M, Schwartz M, Lotze M, Talwalkar J, Gores GJ; Panel of Experts in HCC-Design Clinical Trials. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 May 21;100(10):698-711. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn134. Epub 2008 May 13. |
| 16250051 | Background | Bruix J, Sherman M; Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005 Nov;42(5):1208-36. doi: 10.1002/hep.20933. No abstract available. |
| 17239480 | Background | Varela M, Real MI, Burrel M, Forner A, Sala M, Brunet M, Ayuso C, Castells L, Montana X, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with drug eluting beads: efficacy and doxorubicin pharmacokinetics. J Hepatol. 2007 Mar;46(3):474-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.10.020. Epub 2006 Nov 29. |
| 12049862 | Background | Llovet JM, Real MI, Montana X, Planas R, Coll S, Aponte J, Ayuso C, Sala M, Muchart J, Sola R, Rodes J, Bruix J; Barcelona Liver Cancer Group. Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002 May 18;359(9319):1734-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08649-X. |
| interventional treatment of HCC | View source |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D008107 | Liver Diseases |