Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this proposal, the investigators extend their previous SPiRE feasibility and preliminary effectiveness study to examine STEP-Home efficacy in a RCT design. This novel therapy will target the specific needs of a broad range of underserved post-9/11 Veterans. It is designed to foster reintegration by facilitating meaningful improvement in the functional skills most central to community participation: emotional regulation (ER), problem solving (PS), and attention functioning (AT). The skills trained in the STEP-Home workshop are novel in their collective use and have not been systematically applied to a Veteran population prior to the investigators' SPiRE study. STEP-Home will equip Veterans with skills to improve daily function, reduce anger and irritability, and assist reintegration to civilian life through return to work, family, and community, while simultaneously providing psychoeducation to promote future engagement in VA care.
The innovative nature of the STEP-Home intervention is founded in the fact that it is: (a) an adaptation of an established and efficacious intervention, now applied to post-9/11 Veterans; (b) nonstigmatizing (not "therapy" but a "skills workshop" to boost acceptance, adherence and retention); (c) transdiagnostic (open to all post-9/11 Veterans with self-reported reintegration difficulties; Veterans often have multiple mental health diagnoses, but it is not required for enrollment); (d) integrative (focus on the whole person rather than specific and often stigmatizing mental and physical health conditions); (e) comprised of Veteran-specific content to teach participants cognitive behavioral skills needed for successful reintegration (which led to greater acceptability in feasibility study); (f) targets anger and irritability, particularly during interactions with civilians; (g) emphasizes psychoeducation (including other available treatment options for common mental health conditions); and (h) challenges beliefs/barriers to mental health care to increase openness to future treatment and greater mental health treatment utilization. Many Veterans who participated in the development phases of this workshop have gone on to trauma or other focused therapies, or taken on vocational (work/school/volunteer) roles after STEP-Home.
The investigators have demonstrated that the STEP-Home workshop is feasible and results in pre-post change in core skill acquisition that the investigators demonstrated to be directly associated with post-workshop improvement in reintegration status in their SPiRE study. Given the many comorbidities of this cohort, the innovative treatment addresses multiple aspects of mental health, cognitive, and emotional function simultaneously and bolsters reintegration in a short-term group to maximize cost-effectiveness while maintaining quality of care.
Post-9/11 Veterans who served in OEF/OIF face many challenges as they re-enter civilian life after structured military careers. Yet, underutilization and resistance to mental health treatment remains a significant problem. Recent investigations of community reintegration problems among returning Veterans found that half of combat Veterans who use Veterans Administration (VA) services reported difficulty in readjusting to civilian life, including difficulty in social functioning, productivity in work and school settings, community involvement, and self-care domains. High rates of marital, family, and cohabitation discord were reported, with 75% reporting a family conflict in the last week. At least one-third reported divorce, dangerous driving and risky behaviors, increased substance use, and impulsivity and anger control problems since deployment. Almost all Veterans expressed interest in receiving services to help readjust to civilian life, and receiving reintegration services at a VA facility was reported as the preferred way to receive help. Mental health and anger problems are often cited as driving Veterans' difficulties readjusting to civilian life. Anger is becoming more widely recognized for its involvement in the psychological adjustment problems of post-9/11 Veterans. Research has shown that anger directly influences treatment outcome. In fact, history of untreated PTSD and aggression have been demonstrated to be pervasive among post-9/11 Veterans who die by suicide in the months before death. Veterans with probable PTSD report more reintegration and anger problems, and greater interest in services than Veterans without. Reintegration and anger problems continue for years post-combat and may not resolve without intervention.
Research on TBI in post-9/11 Veterans underscores the need for programs that utilize an interdisciplinary approach to reintegration. Programs designed to address challenges of Veterans as they reintegrate in vocational environments, particularly integrative approaches, are greatly needed. The STEP-Home intervention provides such a program. STEP-Home includes focused cognitive and emotional regulation skills training and is informed by the most recent research with returning Veterans and available programs focused on reintegration in VA and military settings (e.g., Battlemind training).
Phase 1: Years 1 and 2 The investigators will initiate the study at the Boston VAMC and develop Standard Operating Procedures for the addition of site 2 in Phase 2.
Phase 2: Years 3 and 4 The investigators will initiate the study at the second site, the Houston VAMC, in Year 3. The investigators will apply in Year 2 for IRB approval to initiate site 2.
Hypotheses & Aims
Primary Aim 1. Examine treatment effects of STEP-Home on primary outcomes relative to Present Centered Group Therapy (PCGT):
Hypothesis 1A. Participants randomized into the STEP-Home intervention will show improvement on reintegration, readjustment, and anger post-intervention (expressed by lower scores; less difficulty).
Military to Civilian Questionnaire (M2CQ), Post-Deployment Readjustment Inventory (PDRI), and State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI-2) scores post-intervention (T4) < baseline (T1)
Hypothesis 1B. Participants randomized into STEP-Home will show greater improvement in primary outcomes as compared to PCGT.
Change scores baseline (T1) to post-intervention (T4) STEP-Home > PCGT change scores Post-intervention (T4) primary outcome scores STEP-Home < PCGT primary outcome scores (T4)
Primary Aim 2. Examine maintenance of treatment effects on primary outcomes:
Hypothesis 2: Treatment effects will be maintained at follow up in both groups. Differential treatment effect of STEP-Home over PCGT post-intervention (T4) will be maintained at follow up (T5).
Exploratory Aim 1. Explore treatment effects of STEP-Home on measures of mental health, functional and vocational status and cognitive secondary outcomes targeted indirectly in the workshop.
Exploratory Hypothesis 1. Acquisition of core skills (problem solving, emotional regulation, attention training) will mediate the effect of treatment on primary outcomes post-intervention and at follow up.
The successful completion of the aims proposed has the potential to significantly improve skills to foster civilian reintegration in post-9/11Veterans. Furthermore, the STEP-Home SPiRE feasibility study demonstrated that the workshop also serves as a gateway for Veterans who are hesitant to participate in traditional mental health treatments to promote openness and engagement in additional, critically needed, VA services. Given the high rate of treatment resistance in this cohort, developing acceptable interventions that promote treatment engagement and retention, and open the door to future VA care, is necessary to improve functional status and to reduce long-term healthcare costs of untreated mental health illnesses.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| STEP-Home | Experimental | The STEP-Home Arm involves a skills-based intervention focused on Emotional Regulation, Problem Solving, and Attention Training strategies. |
|
| PCGT | Active Comparator | The Present Center Group Therapy (PCGT) Arm involves a nonspecific, supportive intervention, focused on identifying and discussing current life stressors. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STEP-Home | Behavioral | This group will meet for 2 hours a week for 12 weeks. The core skills of Emotional Regulation (ER) (45-minutes) and Problem Solving (PS) (45-minutes) are introduced and then integrated throughout all Veteran-specific content modules for practice and repetition for 12 weeks. Attention Training (AT) augments PS and ER core skills and is interspersed throughout group and individual sessions. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Military to Civilian Questionnaire | A 16-item measure of post-deployment community reintegration in post-9/11 Veterans. Higher scores indicate greater reintegration and functional difficulties. Min: 0, Max: 64 | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| Post-deployment Readjustment Inventory (Change) | A 36-item measure of readjustment in post-9/11 Veterans with six subscales (career challenges, social difficulties, intimate relationship problems, health concerns, concerns about deployment, and PTSD symptoms). Min and max scores for all the subscales, and the total score, are below. For all, lower scores are better. Total score is calculated by adding the value of all items in all subscales. Career: Min: 5, Max: 25 Health: Min: 5, Max: 25 Intimate Relationship: Min: 5, Max: 25 Social readjustment: Min: 7, Max: 35 Concerns about deployment: Min: 6, Max: 30 PTSD symptoms: Min: 8, Max: 40 TOTAL score: Min: 36, Max: 180 | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI-2) (Change) | A 57-item widely used measure to assess state anger, trait anger, and anger expression with three subscales (state anger, trait anger, and anger expression). Min and max scores for the subscales, and the total score, are below. For all, lower scores are better. How I Feel Right Now (State Anger): Min: 10, Max: 40, Calculated by summing 15 items in scale How I Generally Feel (Trait Anger): Min: 10, Max: 40, Calculated by summing 15 items in scale When Angry or Furious (Anger expression index): Min: 24, Max: 96, Calculated by summing anger control scores for each item (12 items) and subtracting that from sum of anger expression scores for each item (12 items) | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Attention-Related Cognitive Errors Scale (ARCES) (Change) | Measure of everyday performance failures arising from brief failures of sustained attention. Min: 12, Max: 60 (lower scores are better) | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| Problem Solving Inventory (PSI) (Change) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Post-9/11 Veterans who report some reintegration, readjustment, or anger difficulty
18-75 years old (to avoid outcomes being affected by aging)
English-speaking (sessions will be conducted in English)
Agreeing to participate
Exclusion Criteria:
schizophreniform disorder/active psychosis
bipolar disorder
active suicidality/homicidality requiring crisis intervention
other severe psychiatric disorders prohibiting appropriate group participation
neurological diagnosis prohibiting appropriate group participation (excluding TBI)
current substance dependence
current participation in any other form of active behavioral therapy at the time of enrollment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Catherine B Fortier, PhD | VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA | Boston | Massachusetts | 02130-4817 | United States | ||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35473650 | Background | Fortier CB, Currao A, Kenna A, Kim S, Beck BM, Katz D, Hursh C, Fonda JR. Online Telehealth Delivery of Group Mental Health Treatment Is Safe, Feasible, and Increases Enrollment and Attendance in Post-9/11 U.S. Veterans. Behav Ther. 2022 May;53(3):469-480. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.11.004. Epub 2021 Nov 25. | |
| 38614448 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
195 (138M/57F) post-9/11 U.S. military Veterans were randomized to either 12 sessions of SH or PCGT. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks. Analyses were based on intention to treat.
Participants were recruited from VA clinical services, community partners (e.g., schools, Vet Centers, Veteran organizations), advertisements on social media (e.g., Facebook, Instagram), and the Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense Identity Repository.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | STEP-Home | The STEP-Home Arm involves a skills-based intervention focused on Emotional Regulation, Problem Solving, and Attention Training strategies. STEP-Home: This group will meet for 2 hours a week for 12 weeks. The core skills of Emotional Regulation (ER) (45-minutes) and Problem Solving (PS) (45-minutes) are introduced and then integrated throughout all Veteran-specific content modules for practice and repetition for 12 weeks. Attention Training (AT) augments PS and ER core skills and is interspersed throughout group and individual sessions. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention & Post-Treatment Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 1, 2023 |
Not provided
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two group interventions: STEP-Home or Present Centered Group Therapy (PCGT). Each cohort will include a minimum of 8 and a maximum of 20 participants who will be randomized to either STEP-Home (n = 4-10 Veterans) or PCGT (n = 4-10 Veterans). After inclusion and exclusion criteria are verified and a cohort of 8 to 20 is available, randomization into STEP-Home or PCGT occurs and participation in the study begins (i.e., Time 1; T1: Pre), during which the investigators will consent, administer the baseline assessments, randomly assign to the STEP-Home or PCGT arm, and schedule the treatment sessions. All participants will be assessed at the following outcome points: Screening, at randomization (T1), during treatment 4-week skills check (T2), during treatment 8-week skills check (T3), post-intervention (T4), and at 3-months follow up (T5).
Not provided
Not provided
Assessments are all self-report, therefore, blinded assessors are not required.
|
| PCGT | Behavioral | The PCGT group will also meet for 2 hours a week for 12 weeks. It is a nonspecific and supportive intervention to control for the nonspecific benefits of the group experience (e.g., therapist contact, instillation of hope, expectation of improvement). It will focus on identifying and discussing current life stressors that contribute to reintegration difficulties, psychoeducation, and promotion of wellness and physical health. |
|
Measure of problem solving confidence, approach-avoidance style, and personal control. Min and max scores for all the subscales, and the total score, are below. For all, lower scores are better. Total score calculated by adding the scores of all items. Problem-Solving Confidence: Min: 11, Max: 66 Approach-Avoidance Style: Min: 16, Max: 96 Personal Control: Min: 5, Max: 30 TOTAL score: Min: 32, Max: 192 |
| Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) (Change) | Measure to assess multiple aspects of emotion dysregulation. Min and max scores for all the subscales, and the total score, are below. For all, lower scores are better. Nonacceptance of emotional responses: Min: 6, Max: 30 Difficulty engaging in goal-directed behavior: Min: 6, Max: 25 Impulse control difficulties: Min: 6, Max: 30 Lack of emotional awareness: Min: 6, Max: 30 Limited access to emotion regulation strategies: Min: 8, Max: 40 Lack of emotional clarity: Min: 5, Max: 25 TOTAL score: Min: 36, Max: 180, Total score calculated by adding the scores of all items (reverse scoring awareness items). | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) (Change) | A 20-item measure of PTSD updated for DSM-5. Min: 0, Max: 80 (lower scores are better) | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) (Change) | A 21-item measure of current depression, anxiety, and stress. Each subscale Min: 7, Max: 28 (lower scores are better) | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| Neurobehavioral Symptoms Inventory (NSI) (Change) | A 22-item measure of current post-concussive symptoms. Total score Min: 0, Max: 88 (lower scores are better), calculated by adding the scores of all of the subscales. Vestibular Min: 0, Max: 12 (3 items) Somatosensory Min: 0, Max: 20 (5 items) Affective Min: 0, Max: 24 (6 items) Cognitive Min: 0, Max: 32 (8 items) | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-2.0 (WHODAS-2.0) (Change) | Measures functional states in six domains (understanding and communicating, getting around, self care, getting along with people, life activities (work/school), and participation in society). Possible raw min and max scores are below. For all subscales and total score, data is presented as a computed score in a range from 0-100. This is calculated by taking the raw score for each subscale and total score, dividing it by number of possible points for the relevant questions, and multiplying it by 100. Lower scores are better. Understanding and Communicating: Min: 0, Max: 24 Getting Around: Min: 0, Max: 20 Self Care: Min: 0, Max: 16 Getting Along with People: Min: 0, Max: 20 Life Activities: Min: 0, Max: 16 Work-School: Min: 0, Max: 16 Participation: Min: 0, Max: 32 Total Aggregate: Min: 0, Max: 144 | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) (Change) | A 5-item measure of satisfaction with life. Min: 5, Max: 35 (higher scores are better) | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| Number of Participants Differing in Activity Engagement Over Time (Change) | Assesses engagement in school, work, and life activities. Participants self reported engagement in each category at each time point. Categories are not mutually exclusive, but rather indicate how many participants endorsed participating in each category at each time point. A scale is not used in this measure. | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| Barriers to Employment Success Inventory (BESI) (Change) | A measure of obstacles to employment in five areas (Personal/Financial, Emotional/Physical, Career Decision-Making and Planning, Job-Seeking Knowledge, and Training/Education). Min and max scores for all the subscales, and the total score, are below. For all, lower scores are better. Only total score analyzed, subscales not reported. Personal and Financial: Min: 10, Max: 40 Emotional and Physical: Min: 10, Max: 40 Career Decision-Making and Planning: Min: 10, Max: 40 Job-Seeking Knowledge: Min: 10, Max: 40 Training and Education: Min: 10, Max: 40 TOTAL score: Min: 50, Max: 200 | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| Number of Participants Differing in Average Number of Hours Worked (Change) | Change in average number of hours worked per month over time. Participants self-reported average number of hours worked in the month before STEP-Home (baseline), in each month of the intervention/PCGT (measured at post-treatment), and post-treatment monitoring (follow-up). A scale is not used in this measure. Each row indicates the number of participants that worked the indicated number of hours at each time point. Rows are mutually exclusive. | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe) (Change) | Measures apathy, disinhibition, and executive dysfunction. Min and max possible scores for subscales and total score are below. For all, lower scores are better. Total score calculated by adding the scores of all items. Subscale scores calculated by adding the scores of the items in each subscale. Apathy Min: 14, Max: 70 Disinhibition Min: 15, Max: 75 Executive Dysfunction Min: 17, Max: 85 Total Score Min: 46, Max: 230 | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX |
| Houston |
| Texas |
| 77030 |
| United States |
| Fortier CB, Kenna A, Katz D, Kim S, Hursh C, Beck B, Sablone CA, Currao A, Lebas A, Jorge RE, Fonda JR. STEP-Home transdiagnostic group reintegration workshop to improve mental health outcomes for post-9/11 Veterans: Design, methods, and rationale for a randomized controlled behavioral trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;141:107536. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107536. Epub 2024 Apr 16. |
| FG001 | PCGT | The Present Center Group Therapy (PCGT) Arm involves a nonspecific, supportive intervention, focused on identifying and discussing current life stressors. PCGT: The PCGT group will also meet for 2 hours a week for 12 weeks. It is a nonspecific and supportive intervention to control for the nonspecific benefits of the group experience (e.g., therapist contact, instillation of hope, expectation of improvement). It will focus on identifying and discussing current life stressors that contribute to reintegration difficulties, psychoeducation, and promotion of wellness and physical health. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Follow-Up Assessment |
|
|
Only participants with available baseline data are included in baseline demographic analyses
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | STEP-Home | The STEP-Home Arm involves a skills-based intervention focused on Emotional Regulation, Problem Solving, and Attention Training strategies. STEP-Home: This group will meet for 2 hours a week for 12 weeks. The core skills of Emotional Regulation (ER) (45-minutes) and Problem Solving (PS) (45-minutes) are introduced and then integrated throughout all Veteran-specific content modules for practice and repetition for 12 weeks. Attention Training (AT) augments PS and ER core skills and is interspersed throughout group and individual sessions. |
| BG001 | PCGT | The Present Center Group Therapy (PCGT) Arm involves a nonspecific, supportive intervention, focused on identifying and discussing current life stressors. PCGT: The PCGT group will also meet for 2 hours a week for 12 weeks. It is a nonspecific and supportive intervention to control for the nonspecific benefits of the group experience (e.g., therapist contact, instillation of hope, expectation of improvement). It will focus on identifying and discussing current life stressors that contribute to reintegration difficulties, psychoeducation, and promotion of wellness and physical health. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Participants with available baseline data | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| ||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Categories are not mutually exclusive. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Branch of Service | Participants with available baseline data. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Military to Civilian Questionnaire | A 16-item measure of post-deployment community reintegration in post-9/11 Veterans. Higher scores indicate greater reintegration and functional difficulties. Min: 0, Max: 64 | Number of participants analyzed indicates number of enrolled participants that completed survey questions at each time point | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Post-deployment Readjustment Inventory (Change) | A 36-item measure of readjustment in post-9/11 Veterans with six subscales (career challenges, social difficulties, intimate relationship problems, health concerns, concerns about deployment, and PTSD symptoms). Min and max scores for all the subscales, and the total score, are below. For all, lower scores are better. Total score is calculated by adding the value of all items in all subscales. Career: Min: 5, Max: 25 Health: Min: 5, Max: 25 Intimate Relationship: Min: 5, Max: 25 Social readjustment: Min: 7, Max: 35 Concerns about deployment: Min: 6, Max: 30 PTSD symptoms: Min: 8, Max: 40 TOTAL score: Min: 36, Max: 180 | Number of participants analyzed indicates number of enrolled participants that completed survey questions at each time point | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI-2) (Change) | A 57-item widely used measure to assess state anger, trait anger, and anger expression with three subscales (state anger, trait anger, and anger expression). Min and max scores for the subscales, and the total score, are below. For all, lower scores are better. How I Feel Right Now (State Anger): Min: 10, Max: 40, Calculated by summing 15 items in scale How I Generally Feel (Trait Anger): Min: 10, Max: 40, Calculated by summing 15 items in scale When Angry or Furious (Anger expression index): Min: 24, Max: 96, Calculated by summing anger control scores for each item (12 items) and subtracting that from sum of anger expression scores for each item (12 items) | Number of participants analyzed indicates number of enrolled participants that completed survey questions at each time point | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Attention-Related Cognitive Errors Scale (ARCES) (Change) | Measure of everyday performance failures arising from brief failures of sustained attention. Min: 12, Max: 60 (lower scores are better) | Number of participants analyzed indicates number of enrolled participants that completed survey questions at each time point | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Problem Solving Inventory (PSI) (Change) | Measure of problem solving confidence, approach-avoidance style, and personal control. Min and max scores for all the subscales, and the total score, are below. For all, lower scores are better. Total score calculated by adding the scores of all items. Problem-Solving Confidence: Min: 11, Max: 66 Approach-Avoidance Style: Min: 16, Max: 96 Personal Control: Min: 5, Max: 30 TOTAL score: Min: 32, Max: 192 | Number of participants analyzed indicates number of enrolled participants that completed survey questions at each time point | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) (Change) | Measure to assess multiple aspects of emotion dysregulation. Min and max scores for all the subscales, and the total score, are below. For all, lower scores are better. Nonacceptance of emotional responses: Min: 6, Max: 30 Difficulty engaging in goal-directed behavior: Min: 6, Max: 25 Impulse control difficulties: Min: 6, Max: 30 Lack of emotional awareness: Min: 6, Max: 30 Limited access to emotion regulation strategies: Min: 8, Max: 40 Lack of emotional clarity: Min: 5, Max: 25 TOTAL score: Min: 36, Max: 180, Total score calculated by adding the scores of all items (reverse scoring awareness items). | Number of participants analyzed indicates number of enrolled participants that completed survey questions at each time point | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) (Change) | A 20-item measure of PTSD updated for DSM-5. Min: 0, Max: 80 (lower scores are better) | Number of participants analyzed indicates number of enrolled participants that completed survey questions at each time point | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) (Change) | A 21-item measure of current depression, anxiety, and stress. Each subscale Min: 7, Max: 28 (lower scores are better) | Number of participants analyzed indicates number of enrolled participants that completed survey questions at each time point | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Neurobehavioral Symptoms Inventory (NSI) (Change) | A 22-item measure of current post-concussive symptoms. Total score Min: 0, Max: 88 (lower scores are better), calculated by adding the scores of all of the subscales. Vestibular Min: 0, Max: 12 (3 items) Somatosensory Min: 0, Max: 20 (5 items) Affective Min: 0, Max: 24 (6 items) Cognitive Min: 0, Max: 32 (8 items) | Number of participants analyzed indicates number of enrolled participants that completed survey questions at each time point | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-2.0 (WHODAS-2.0) (Change) | Measures functional states in six domains (understanding and communicating, getting around, self care, getting along with people, life activities (work/school), and participation in society). Possible raw min and max scores are below. For all subscales and total score, data is presented as a computed score in a range from 0-100. This is calculated by taking the raw score for each subscale and total score, dividing it by number of possible points for the relevant questions, and multiplying it by 100. Lower scores are better. Understanding and Communicating: Min: 0, Max: 24 Getting Around: Min: 0, Max: 20 Self Care: Min: 0, Max: 16 Getting Along with People: Min: 0, Max: 20 Life Activities: Min: 0, Max: 16 Work-School: Min: 0, Max: 16 Participation: Min: 0, Max: 32 Total Aggregate: Min: 0, Max: 144 | Number of participants analyzed indicates number of enrolled participants that completed survey questions at each time point | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) (Change) | A 5-item measure of satisfaction with life. Min: 5, Max: 35 (higher scores are better) | Number of participants analyzed indicates number of enrolled participants that completed survey questions at each time point | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Differing in Activity Engagement Over Time (Change) | Assesses engagement in school, work, and life activities. Participants self reported engagement in each category at each time point. Categories are not mutually exclusive, but rather indicate how many participants endorsed participating in each category at each time point. A scale is not used in this measure. | Number of participants analyzed indicates number of enrolled participants that completed survey questions at each time point | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | No | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Barriers to Employment Success Inventory (BESI) (Change) | A measure of obstacles to employment in five areas (Personal/Financial, Emotional/Physical, Career Decision-Making and Planning, Job-Seeking Knowledge, and Training/Education). Min and max scores for all the subscales, and the total score, are below. For all, lower scores are better. Only total score analyzed, subscales not reported. Personal and Financial: Min: 10, Max: 40 Emotional and Physical: Min: 10, Max: 40 Career Decision-Making and Planning: Min: 10, Max: 40 Job-Seeking Knowledge: Min: 10, Max: 40 Training and Education: Min: 10, Max: 40 TOTAL score: Min: 50, Max: 200 | Number of participants analyzed indicates number of enrolled participants that completed survey questions at each time point | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Differing in Average Number of Hours Worked (Change) | Change in average number of hours worked per month over time. Participants self-reported average number of hours worked in the month before STEP-Home (baseline), in each month of the intervention/PCGT (measured at post-treatment), and post-treatment monitoring (follow-up). A scale is not used in this measure. Each row indicates the number of participants that worked the indicated number of hours at each time point. Rows are mutually exclusive. | Number of participants analyzed indicates number of enrolled participants that completed survey questions at each time point | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | No | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe) (Change) | Measures apathy, disinhibition, and executive dysfunction. Min and max possible scores for subscales and total score are below. For all, lower scores are better. Total score calculated by adding the scores of all items. Subscale scores calculated by adding the scores of the items in each subscale. Apathy Min: 14, Max: 70 Disinhibition Min: 15, Max: 75 Executive Dysfunction Min: 17, Max: 85 Total Score Min: 46, Max: 230 | Number of participants analyzed indicates number of enrolled participants that completed survey questions at each time point | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, Post 12-Week Treatment, Post Treatment (24 week follow-up) |
|
Baseline, post-intervention (12 weeks), follow-up (24 weeks)
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | STEP-Home | The STEP-Home Arm involves a skills-based intervention focused on Emotional Regulation, Problem Solving, and Attention Training strategies. STEP-Home: This group will meet for 2 hours a week for 12 weeks. The core skills of Emotional Regulation (ER) (45-minutes) and Problem Solving (PS) (45-minutes) are introduced and then integrated throughout all Veteran-specific content modules for practice and repetition for 12 weeks. Attention Training (AT) augments PS and ER core skills and is interspersed throughout group and individual sessions. | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
| EG001 | PCGT | The Present Center Group Therapy (PCGT) Arm involves a nonspecific, supportive intervention, focused on identifying and discussing current life stressors. PCGT: The PCGT group will also meet for 2 hours a week for 12 weeks. It is a nonspecific and supportive intervention to control for the nonspecific benefits of the group experience (e.g., therapist contact, instillation of hope, expectation of improvement). It will focus on identifying and discussing current life stressors that contribute to reintegration difficulties, psychoeducation, and promotion of wellness and physical health. | 0 | 95 | 0 | 95 | 0 | 95 |
Not provided
Not provided
The study sample is predominantly male and white, so results should not be generalized to other populations. Treatment outcomes were based on participant self-report. Low follow-up assessment rates were observed due to challenges retaining randomized participants who did not initiate treatment or dropped out of treatment over time, as well as lack of completion of assessments by treatment completers (although completion rates are within expectation for the post-9/11 population of Veterans).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Catherine B. Fortier | VA Boston Healthcare System | 857-364-4361 | Catherine.Fortier@va.gov |
| Mar 13, 2025 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013313 | Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic |
| D000070642 | Brain Injuries, Traumatic |
| D019966 | Substance-Related Disorders |
| D003863 | Depression |
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| D013405 | Suicide |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D000092862 | Psychological Well-Being |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D040921 | Stress Disorders, Traumatic |
| D000068099 | Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D001930 | Brain Injuries |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D006259 | Craniocerebral Trauma |
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D064419 | Chemically-Induced Disorders |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D016728 | Self-Injurious Behavior |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D010549 | Personal Satisfaction |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Black |
|
| Asian |
|
| American Indian/Alaskan Native |
|
| Other |
|
| Hispanic |
|
| Navy |
|
| Air Force |
|
| Marines |
|
| Coast Guard |
|
| Missing Data |
|
| Multiple Branches |
|
| Follow-Up |
|
Hypothesis 1: Participants randomized into the STEP-Home Intervention will show improvement on reintegration (measured by the Military to Civilian Questionnaire). Hypothesis 2: Treatment effects will be maintained at follow-up for both groups |
| t-test, 2 sided |
| <.0001 |
P-value indicates significance of T-test (α=0.05) for the STEP-Home group from Baseline (T1) to Follow-Up (T3). |
| Superiority |
| Hypothesis 1: Participants randomized into the STEP-Home Intervention will show improvement on reintegration (measured by the Military to Civilian Questionnaire). Hypothesis 2: Treatment effects will be maintained at follow-up for both groups | t-test, 2 sided | <.0001 | P-value indicates significance of T-test (α=0.05) for the Present Centered Group Therapy group from Baseline (T1) to Post-Treatment (T2). | Superiority |
| Hypothesis 1: Participants randomized into the STEP-Home Intervention will show improvement on reintegration (measured by the Military to Civilian Questionnaire). Hypothesis 2: Treatment effects will be maintained at follow-up for both groups | t-test, 2 sided | <.0001 | P-value indicates significance of T-test (α=0.05) for the Present Centered Group Therapy group from Baseline (T1) to Follow-Up (T3). | Superiority |
The Present Center Group Therapy (PCGT) Arm involves a nonspecific, supportive intervention, focused on identifying and discussing current life stressors. PCGT: The PCGT group will also meet for 2 hours a week for 12 weeks. It is a nonspecific and supportive intervention to control for the nonspecific benefits of the group experience (e.g., therapist contact, instillation of hope, expectation of improvement). It will focus on identifying and discussing current life stressors that contribute to reintegration difficulties, psychoeducation, and promotion of wellness and physical health. |
|
|
|
The Present Center Group Therapy (PCGT) Arm involves a nonspecific, supportive intervention, focused on identifying and discussing current life stressors. PCGT: The PCGT group will also meet for 2 hours a week for 12 weeks. It is a nonspecific and supportive intervention to control for the nonspecific benefits of the group experience (e.g., therapist contact, instillation of hope, expectation of improvement). It will focus on identifying and discussing current life stressors that contribute to reintegration difficulties, psychoeducation, and promotion of wellness and physical health. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Present Center Group Therapy (PCGT) Arm involves a nonspecific, supportive intervention, focused on identifying and discussing current life stressors.
PCGT: The PCGT group will also meet for 2 hours a week for 12 weeks. It is a nonspecific and supportive intervention to control for the nonspecific benefits of the group experience (e.g., therapist contact, instillation of hope, expectation of improvement). It will focus on identifying and discussing current life stressors that contribute to reintegration difficulties, psychoeducation, and promotion of wellness and physical health.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| OG001 | PCGT | The Present Center Group Therapy (PCGT) Arm involves a nonspecific, supportive intervention, focused on identifying and discussing current life stressors. PCGT: The PCGT group will also meet for 2 hours a week for 12 weeks. It is a nonspecific and supportive intervention to control for the nonspecific benefits of the group experience (e.g., therapist contact, instillation of hope, expectation of improvement). It will focus on identifying and discussing current life stressors that contribute to reintegration difficulties, psychoeducation, and promotion of wellness and physical health. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Present Center Group Therapy (PCGT) Arm involves a nonspecific, supportive intervention, focused on identifying and discussing current life stressors.
PCGT: The PCGT group will also meet for 2 hours a week for 12 weeks. It is a nonspecific and supportive intervention to control for the nonspecific benefits of the group experience (e.g., therapist contact, instillation of hope, expectation of improvement). It will focus on identifying and discussing current life stressors that contribute to reintegration difficulties, psychoeducation, and promotion of wellness and physical health.
|
|
|
|
|
|