Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In the proposed clinical investigation, the investigational device (BabySize3D) will provide automated plane extraction and automated biometry measurements from 3D US volumes. The results obtained from the investigational software
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main study: 3D volumes acquisitions | Experimental | 3D volume acquisitions |
|
| Ancillary study: 2D and 3D acquisitions | Experimental | 2D standard measurements and 3D volumes acquisitions |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D volume acquisitions | Device | 2 abdominal volumes 2 thigh volumes 2 head volumes |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Bi-parietal diameter in mm. | The bi-parietal diameter in mm will be obtained with three methods: (1) fully automated 3D volume processing and caliper placement, (2) manual 3D volume processing and caliper placement, (3) manual selection of the 2D view plane and manual caliper placement on the screen of the ultrasound system (corresponding to standard of care measurements). The values obtained with the three methods and the differences between these values will be reported. | Day 1 |
| Head circumference in mm | The Head circumference in mm will be obtained with three methods: (1) fully automated 3D volume processing and caliper placement, (2) manual 3D volume processing and caliper placement, (3) manual selection of the 2D view plane and manual caliper placement on the screen of the ultrasound system (corresponding to standard of care measurements). The values obtained with the three methods and the differences between these values will be reported. | Day 1 |
| Abdominal circumference in mm | The Abdominal circumference in mm will be obtained with three methods: (1) fully automated 3D volume processing and caliper placement, (2) manual 3D volume processing and caliper placement, (3) manual selection of the 2D view plane and manual caliper placement on the screen of the ultrasound system (corresponding to standard of care measurements). The values obtained with the three methods and the differences between these values will be reported. | Day 1 |
| Femur length in mm | The Femur length in mm will be obtained with three methods: (1) fully automated 3D volume processing and caliper placement, (2) manual 3D volume processing and caliper placement, (3) manual selection of the 2D view plane and manual caliper placement on the screen of the ultrasound system (corresponding to standard of care measurements). The values obtained with the three methods and the differences between these values will be reported | Day 1 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Failure rate of the automated measurements | Failure rate of the automated measurements | Day 1 |
| Exam and post-processing duration | Exam and post-processing duration |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Gaëlle Gaëlle AMBROISE-GRANDJEAN | CHRU de Nancy | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHRU de Nancy Brabois | Nancy | 54511 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31843832 | Derived | Ambroise Grandjean G, Hossu G, Banasiak C, Ciofolo-Veit C, Raynaud C, Rouet L, Morel O, Beaumont M. Optimization of Fetal Biometry With 3D Ultrasound and Image Recognition (EPICEA): protocol for a prospective cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e031777. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031777. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 2D standard measurements and 3D volumes acquisitions | Device |
|
|
| Day 1 |
| Difference of scores of the 2D standard cephalic plane and cephalic plane extracted from the 3D volume, based on six criteria listed in (Salomon et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 34-40) | The cephalic plane extracted from the 3D volume and the 2D standard cephalic plane will be scored according to the six criteria described in (Salomon et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 34-40). The scores and their difference will be reported. | Day 1 |
| Difference of scores of the 2D standard abdominal plane and abdominal plane extracted from the 3D volume, based on six criteria listed in (Salomon et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 34-40) | The abdominal plane extracted from the 3D volume and the 2D standard abdominal plane will be scored according to the six criteria described in (Salomon et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 34-40). The scores and their difference will be reported. | Day 1 |
| Difference of scores of the 2D standard femoral plane and femoral plane extracted from the 3D volume, based on four criteria listed in (Salomon et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 34-40) | The femoral plane extracted from the 3D volume and the 2D standard femoral plane will be scored according to the four criteria described in (Salomon et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 34-40). The scores and their difference will be reported. | Day 1 |
| Difference of scores of (i) the 2D standard cephalic plane and of (ii) the frames of a sequence of 2D images including the fetus head (cine-loop), based on six criteria listed in (Salomon et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 34-40) | The 2D standard cephalic plane and the frames of a sequence of 2D images including the fetus head will be scored according to the six criteria described in (Salomon et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 34-40). The scores and the score difference (standard view score - frame score) will be reported. | Day 1 |
| Difference of scores of (i) the 2D standard abdominal plane and of (ii) the frames of a sequence of 2D images including the fetus abdomen (cine-loop), based on six criteria listed in (Salomon et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 34-40) | The 2D standard abdominal plane and the frames of a sequence of 2D images including the fetus abdomen will be scored according to the six criteria described in (Salomon et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 34-40). The scores and the score difference (standard view score - frame score) will be reported. | Day 1 |
| Difference of scores of (i) the 2D standard femoral plane and of (ii) the frames of a sequence of 2D images including the fetus femur (cine-loop), based on four criteria listed in (Salomon et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 34-40) | The 2D standard femoral plane and the frames of a sequence of 2D images including the fetus femur will be scored according to the four criteria described in (Salomon et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 34-40). The scores and the score difference (standard view score - frame score) will be reported. | Day 1 |
| Title: Intraclass correlation coefficient of the bi-parietal diameter in mm (same operator) | The intraclass correlation coefficient of the bi-parietal diameter in mm measured from two different 3D volumetric acquisitions of the same patient performed by the same operator will be calculated. | Day 1 |
| Bland-Altman representation of the bi-parietal diameter in mm (same operator) | A Bland-Altman representation of the the bi-parietal diameter in mm measured from two different 3D volumetric acquisitions of the same patient performed by the same operator will be built. | Day 1 |
| Intraclass correlation coefficient of the bi-parietal diameter in mm (different operators) | The intraclass correlation coefficient of the bi-parietal diameter in mm measured from the 3D volumetric acquisitions of the same patient performed by two different operators will be calculated. | Day 1 |
| Bland-Altman representation of the bi-parietal diameter in mm (different operators) | A Bland-Altman representation of the bi-parietal diameter in mm measured from the 3D volumetric acquisitions of the same patient performed by two different operators will be built. | Day 1 |
| Intraclass correlation coefficient of the head circumference in mm (same operator) | the intraclass correlation coefficient of the head circumference in mm measured from two different 3D volumetric acquisitions of the same patient performed by the same operator will be calculated. | Day 1 |
| Bland-Altman representation of the head circumference in mm (same operator) | A Bland-Altman representation of the head circumference in mm measured from two different 3D volumetric acquisitions of the same patient performed by the same operator will be built. | Day 1 |
| Intraclass correlation coefficient of the head circumference in mm (different operators) | The intraclass correlation coefficient of the head circumference in mm measured from the 3D volumetric acquisitions of the same patient performed by two different operators will be calculated. | Day 1 |
| Bland-Altman representation of the head circumference in mm (different operators) | A Bland-Altman representation of the head circumference in mm measured from the 3D volumetric acquisitions of the same patient performed by two different operators will be built. | Day 1 |
| Intraclass correlation coefficient of the abdominal circumference in mm (same operator) | The intraclass correlation coefficient of the abdominal circumference in mm measured from two different 3D volumetric acquisitions of the same patient performed by the same operator will be calculated. | Day 1 |
| Bland-Altman representation of the abdominal circumference in mm (same operator) | A Bland-Altman representation of the abdominal circumference in mm measured from two different 3D volumetric acquisitions of the same patient performed by the same operator will be built. | Day 1 |
| Intraclass correlation coefficient of the abdominal circumference in mm (different operators) | The intraclass correlation coefficient of the abdominal circumference in mm measured from the 3D volumetric acquisitions of the same patient performed by two different operators will be calculated. | Day 1 |
| Bland-Altman representation of the abdominal circumference in mm (different operators) | A Bland-Altman representation of the abdominal circumference in mm measured from the 3D volumetric acquisitions of the same patient performed by two different operators built. | Day 1 |
| Intraclass correlation coefficient of the femoral length in mm (same operator) | The intraclass correlation coefficient of the femoral length in mm measured from two different 3D volumetric acquisitions of the same patient performed by the same operator will be calculated. | Day 1 |
| Bland-Altman representation of the femoral length in mm (same operator) | A Bland-Altman representation of the femoral length in mm measured from two different 3D volumetric acquisitions of the same patient performed by the same operator will be built. | Day 1 |
| Title: Intraclass correlation coefficient of the femoral length in mm (different operators) | The intraclass correlation coefficient of the femoral length in mm measured from the 3D volumetric acquisitions of the same patient performed by two different operators will be calculated. | Day 1 |
| Bland-Altman representation of the femoral length in mm (different operators) | A Bland-Altman representation of the femoral length in mm measured from the 3D volumetric acquisitions of the same patient performed by two different operators will be built. | Day 1 |