Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A recent systematic review (Lee et al, 2016) reported that placement of a soft tissue graft concurrent with immediate implantation may contribute to the stability of gingival level and the augmentation of soft tissue contour. However, most included studies did not have a control group to directly demonstrate the benefit of an immediate implant combined with soft tissue graft (IMITG) compared to immediate implant alone.The objective of this randomized controlled clinical trial with a parallel design is to evaluate the influence of the connective tissue graft on the buccal bone alterations after tooth extraction and immediate implant placement by means of cone beam computer tomography (CBCT).
All participants will be selected on a consecutive basis, among individuals, above the age of 18 years, referred to Dental Clinic of the San Raffaele University, with a single failing tooth in the upper and lower jaw from second premolar to second premolar, candidates for a single implant restoration. After local anesthesia, a split-full-split thickness envelope flap, as described for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions by Zucchelli and de Sanctis (2000), will be elevated and the tooth will be extracted a-traumatically. The immediate implantation procedure will be carried out according to the manufacture protocol and 1mm of the transmucosal portion of the implant will be positioned under the buccal bone crest. In the group "Implant+CTG" a connective tissue graft (CTG), resulting from the extraoral de-epithelialization with the knife blade of a free gingival graft harvested from the palate, will be anchored at the anatomic papillae with 2 horizontal mattress sutures and positioned 1 mm coronal to the buccal bone crest and in the apical direction 2 mm above the buccal crest. Patients will be followed for 6 months after implant placement and 6 months after loading.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implant | Active Comparator | Immediate dental implant placement |
|
| Implant+CTG | Experimental | Immediate dental implant placement with CTG. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate dental implant placement | Procedure | Tooth will be extracted and a dental implant will be positioned at the same time. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Volumetric buccal bone changes | Ratio scale - lower values represent a better outcome | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Volumetric buccal soft tissue changes | Ratio scale - higher values represent a better outcome | 6 months |
| Buccal soft tissue changes | Ratio scale - higher values represent a better outcome |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Massimo de Sanctis, MD | Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massimo de Sanctis | Milan | Mi | 20132 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24593810 | Background | Schneider D, Schmidlin PR, Philipp A, Annen BM, Ronay V, Hammerle CH, Attin T, Jung RE. Labial soft tissue volume evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jun;41(6):612-7. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12246. Epub 2014 Mar 26. | |
| 23163915 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Immediate dental implant placement with CTG | Procedure | Tooth will be extracted and a dental implant will be positioned at the same time with a connective tissue graft. |
|
| 6 months |
| Patient perception outcomes | Visual Analogic Scale - values from '0=no pain' to '10=worst pain imaginable' | 1 week and 6 months |
| Jung RE, Philipp A, Annen BM, Signorelli L, Thoma DS, Hammerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. Radiographic evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jan;40(1):90-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12027. Epub 2012 Nov 19. |
| 26370904 | Background | Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Buser D, Belser U. Influence of implant neck design on facial bone crest dimensions in the esthetic zone analyzed by cone beam CT: a comparative study with a 5-to-9-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Sep;27(9):1055-64. doi: 10.1111/clr.12692. Epub 2015 Sep 15. |
| 24890861 | Background | Schropp L, Wenzel A, Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A. Fate of the buccal bone at implants placed early, delayed, or late after tooth extraction analyzed by cone beam CT: 10-year results from a randomized, controlled, clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 May;26(5):492-500. doi: 10.1111/clr.12424. Epub 2014 Jun 2. |