Change from baseline to the end of Week 4 in average total instantaneous AM scores (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) for each symptom: nasal congestion, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), facial pain/pressure sensation. Baseline scores are the averaged total instantaneous AM scores over the last 7 days of the single blind run in period, and the end of Week 4, scores are averaged over the 7 days from the subject diary. Range of scores for each nasal symptom is 0= none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Composite score is a sum of the 3 symptom scores and will range from 0 to 9.

Full analysis set

Change from baseline to Week 24/ET in the average percent of ethmoid and maxillary sinus volume opacified as measured by CT. Percent volume opacified can range from 0% to 100%. Outcome measure is the percentage change from percent opacification at baseline to percent opacification at Week 24; therefore, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%. For example, if Baseline opacification was 68.22% and Week 24 opacification was 66.11%, then the change would be reported as -2.11%.

Full analysis set

The SNOT-22 is a subject-completed questionnaire that consists of 22 symptoms and social/emotional consequences of their nasal disorder across several domains including: rhinologic, ear/facial pain, psychological dysfunction, and sleep dysfunction. Total scores range from 0-110. Each item is rated as follows: 0=no problem, 1=very mild problem, 2=mild or slight problem,3=moderate problem, 4=severe problem, 5=problem as bad as it can be.

Full analysis set

Change from baseline in average total instantaneous AM scores (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) for each symptom: nasal congestion, nasal discharge (anterior and/or posterior), facial pain/pressure sensation. Baseline scores are the averaged total instantaneous AM scores over the last 7 days of the single blind run in period, and the end of Week 4, scores are averaged over the 7 days from the subject diary. Range of scores for each nasal symptom is 0= none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Composite score is a sum of the 3 symptom scores and will range from 0 to 9.

Full analysis set

Subjects will report both instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) and reflective (evaluation of symptom severity over the past 12 hours), The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living.

Full analysis set

Subjects will report both instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) and reflective (evaluation of symptom severity over the past 12 hours) The sense of smell scored as 0= normal, 1=slightly impaired, 2=moderately impaired, 3=absent. The change reported in the results is calculated by subtracting the score reported at Baseline from the score reported at Visit 4 (Week 12).

Full analysis set

Subjects will report both instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) and reflective (evaluation of symptom severity over the past 12 hours). The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living.

Full analysis set

Subjects will report both instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) and reflective (evaluation of symptom severity over the past 12 hours). The Nasal Symptom Scale scores as 0=none, 1=mild-symptoms clearly present but minimal awareness, and easily tolerated, 2= moderate - definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable, 3 = severe - symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living.

The value reported in the results is calculated by subtracting the score reported by the patient at Baseline from the score reported by the patient at Visit 4 (Week 12).

Full analysis set

Change from baseline to Week 24/ET in the average percent of ethmoid and maxillary sinus volume opacified as measured by CT for CRS with Nasal Polyps (NP) and without NP sub-groups and in patients with and without previous sinus surgery. Percent volume opacified can range from 0% to 100%. Outcome measure is percentage change from percent opacification at baseline to percent opacification at Week 24; therefor, change in opacification volume can range from -100% to 100%. For example, if Baseline opacification was 68.22% and Week 24 opacification was 66.11%, then the change would be reported as -2.11%.

Full analysis set

Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification), plus a 0-2 score for each of the left and right ostiomeatal complex (OMC). The total LM score for a CT scan ranges from 0-24.

Full analysis set

Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification), plus a 0-2 score for the ostiomeatal complex (OMC).

The values reported for this outcome are the change in total opacification of the left and right maxillary and ethmoid sinuses (Visit 6 [Wk 24] score minus Baseline score). Each visit score can range from a total of 0-12 (sum of 0-2 score assigned for each of left and right maxillary, left and right anterior ethmoid, and left and right posterior ethmoid).

Full analysis set

Lund-Mackay Staging System: Lund-Mackay (LM) system (Lund and Mackay, 1993) assigns to each of 10 sinus cavities (left and right maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal) a score of 0 (no opacification), 1 (partial opacification), or 2 (total opacification), plus a 0-2 score for the ostiomeatal complex (OMC).

Each sinus pair (left and right side) listed below can achieve a total score of 0-4 (sum of 0-2 for each side). The values reported below are calculated by subtracting the total score at Baseline from the total score at Visit 6 (Wk 24).

Full analysis set

Full analysis set

Full analysis set

Percent of sinus volume occupied by disease in the worst sinus between maxillary and ethmoid sinuses for the total population, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) subgroup, chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) subgroup, patients with previous sinus surgery subgroup, and without previous surgery subgroup.

Data is provided for the total population and 4 subgroups. The population of the subgroups will not equal the total population, as they are only a portion of subjects from the total.

Zeinrich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System:

Zeinrich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100% for each sinus. Total score ranges from 0 to 50.

Zeinrich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System:

Zeinrich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100% The total score for the combined ethmoids and maxillary sinuses can range from 0-30 (0-5 for each left and right of the anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, and maxillary sinuses). The outcome values presented in the results are determined by subtracting the total score at Baseline from the total score at Week 24.

Zeinrich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System:

Zeinrich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100% Each sinus pair (left and right side) listed below can achieve a total score of 0-10 (sum of score on each side). The values reported for this outcome calculated by subtracting the score at Baseline from the score at Visit 6 (Wk 24).

Zeinrich Modification of the Lund-Mackay Staging System:

Zeinrich modified the LM system by creating subdivisions within "partial opacification" and increasing the range of scores to 0-5 based on percent opacification: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1%-25%, 2 = 26%-50%, 3 = 51%-75%, 4 = 76%- 99%, and 5 = 100%

Data provided for full population and CRSwNP, CRSsNP, subjects with prior sinus surgery, and subjects without prior sinus surgery subgroups. Number of participants analyzed in the subgroups will be less than the total overall, as these are only portions of the total population.

Comparing the distribution of time to first acute exacerbation of chronic sinusitis, defined as a worsening of symptoms that requires escalation of treatment

Number of patients experiencing exacerbation within each treatment group.

Recording of each dose of approved rescue medication after the Week 4 visit through Week 12

We were unable to complete this analysis due to a misunderstanding on the part of the subjects in the definition of "rescue medication". It was confirmed across most countries and sites that subjects indicated use of rescue medication mistakenly, thinking they were being asked to report whether they took the study medication. This data could not be fully reconciled and, therefore, no analysis was completed.

The PSQI is a validated, self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. Nineteen individual items generate 7 "component" scores (each ranging between 0 and 3): subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of scores for these 7 components yields 1 global score ranging between 0 and 21. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

Full analysis set. Population sizes differ based on number of patients that completed the assessment at each timepoint.

Global impression of change will be assessed using a subject-completed PGIC scale range: 1 - Very much improved, 2 - Much improved, 3 - Minimally improved, 4 - No change, 5 - Minimally worse, 6 - Much worse, 7 - Very much worse

Population size at each timepoint differs based on the number of patients that completed the assessment at the timepoint.

The 16-item QIDS (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS is available in a self-rated version and assesses all the criterion symptom domains designated by the American Psychiatry Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th edition to diagnose a major depressive episode. The 7-day period prior to assessment is the usual time frame for assessing symptom severity. Scores range from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

Change from baseline to Week 24/ET on the MCS of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire. The scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability.

Change from baseline to Week 24/ET on the PCS of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2). The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire. The scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability.

The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, 36-item subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health (RP), bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. The SF-36v2 survey with a 4-week recall will be used. It yields scale scores for each of these 8 health domains , each of which is scored from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate with a better health status, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning possible.

Full Analysis Set

The 16-item QIDS (Rush et al. 2003) is designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The QIDS is available in a self-rated version and assesses all the criterion symptom domains designated by the American Psychiatry Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th edition to diagnose a major depressive episode. The 7-day period prior to assessment is the usual time frame for assessing symptom severity. Scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

Full analysis set

The SIT is a test comprised of 4 booklets each containing 10 microencapsulated (scratch and sniff) odors. Forced choice response alternatives to identify the odor accompany each test item. Each correct response is assigned a score of 1 and incorrect responses are assigned a score of 0. The total score is calculated by summing the scores of each individual odor for a total possible score ranging from 0-40. The higher the score, the better the individual's sense of smell. The test provides an absolute indication of smell loss (anosmia; mild, moderate or severe hyposmia) as well as an index to detect malingering.

Full analysis set

The EQ-5D consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The outcome measured for this study was the EQ VAS, which records the subject's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the subject's own judgement. VAS scores range from 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine).

Full Analysis Set. Only VAS Scores analyzed.

The SF-6D is a single health state index derived from the 11 items from the SF-36v2. SF-6D scores range from 0 (worst health state) to 1 (best health state).

Full Analysis Set

Percentage of subjects indicating that they are willing to consider Sinus Surgery

Full Analysis Set

Percentage of Subjects who meet the minimal objective criteria for surgical intervention

Full Analysis Set

Outcome value presented here is the percent of subjects who are approved for surgery but no longer elect to undergo a surgery. The number of participants analyzed indicates the total number of participants for whom this analysis was completed.

Full Analysis Set

The Health and Work Performance Questionnaire measures work productivity (absenteeism and presenteeism). - Absenteeism is measured in missed work days over the past four weeks (range 0-20); absenteeism is measured in % productivity at work (0-100%), with higher values indicating improved productivity. Values for this outcome are reported as the change in relative absenteeism (the percentage of productivity at work) from baseline to Week 24.

Full analysis set. Population size determined by the number of patients that completed the questionnaire at baseline and Week 24.

Assessment of safety by measuring severity of AEs using scale with 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe

Safety Analysis Set - Subjects with at least 1 AE

Assessed in nasal examination worksheet which includes recording the presence of any epistaxis, septal erosion/perforation, ulceration/erosion of area other than septum.

Safety Analysis Set

Includes systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements in millimeter of mercury (mmHg)

Safety Analysis Set

Measure pulse in beats per minute (bpm)

Safety Analysis Set

Assessment of safety from physical examination-weight measured in kg or lb

Safety Analysis Set

Assessment for safety from the collection of information for concomitant medications usage

Number of subjects receiving concomitant medications. Only top 5 con-meds are detailed below.