Debunking Myths About Contraceptive Safety Among Women in Kingston, Jamaica
Debunking Myths About Contraceptive Safety Among Women in Kingston, Jamaica
The primary hypothesis is that the intervention video - based on strategies from cognitive psychology - can correct women's misinformation about long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and result in higher use of LARC. While there are no direct benefits to participants from being in the study, the research could benefit women in general by providing evidence to help prevent unintended pregnancy. Unlike many interventions that are not feasible for scaling up once shown to be effective in changing people's behavior, the proposed intervention has been carefully designed to impose a low burden to clinic staff and require few resources for translating to wider use. Thus, the investigators expect the intervention to have high potential for influencing clinical care and research for addressing the overall goal of reducing unintended pregnancy.
The investigators will conduct a randomized trial (RT) of consenting adult women (N=220) to test the effectiveness of the final intervention video.
Participants in the RT will complete the "Enrollment Questionnaire" and then will be randomized to either watch a short video on 1) debiasing about LARC safety (intervention arm; n=110) or 2) vector control (control arm; n=110) (Figure 2). Participants then will have the option of receiving routine contraceptive services that follow standard care. After three months, trained interviewers will contact participants to administer the short "Follow-up Questionnaire" via telephone. To corroborate participant reporting of contraception use during follow-up, the investigators also will extract data on LARC use from participant medical records.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: