Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| mona bologh elmorad,MD | UNKNOWN |
| mohmed naser shaddad,MD | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is the management of choice in double level lumbar (L) spondylolisthesis (L3-L5) after ineffective conservative treatment. We evaluated bilateral ultrasound (US)-guided single shot erector spinae plane (ESP) block at the level of lumbar 3 (L3) vertebra with or without dexmedetomidine (Dex).
Objectives: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is the management of choice in double level lumbar (L) spondylolisthesis (L3-L5) after ineffective conservative treatment. We evaluated bilateral ultrasound (US)-guided single shot erector spinae plane (ESP) block at the level of lumbar 3 (L3) vertebra with or without dexmedetomidine (Dex).
Methods: A prospective controlled randomized, double-blind study comparing two groups of patients; each group included 20 patients of double level spondylolisthesis (L3-L5) scheduled for (PLIF) under general anesthesia combined with bilateral US-guided ESP single shot block at (L3). Group I received 20 ml of 0. 25% bupivacaine plus one mL normal saline bilaterally. Group II received 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with supplementation of 1 mL containing 100µg dexmedetomidine bilaterally. Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) length of stay, the total dose of postoperative analgesics need, postoperative visual analogue score (VAS) at 1h, 6h, 12h, and 24 h after the operation and postoperative complications which related to block or opioids were recorded.
ESP block at combined with (Dex) is a safe, effective block with no complications. Addition of 100µg Dex to preoperative ESP block provided good postoperative opioid-sparing analgesia, facilitated the early emergence and shortened the length of stay in the PACU during (PLIF) for double level spondylolisthesis (L3-L5).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Placebo Comparator | received 20 ml of 0. 25% bupivacaine plus one mL normal saline bilaterally. |
|
| Group II | Active Comparator | received 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with supplementation of 1 mL containing 100µg dexmedetomidine bilaterally |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound Guided Bilateral single shot Erector Spinae Plane Block | Drug | Under aseptic technique and after skin infiltration with 3 ml of 2% lidocaine, a 22G, 50-mm, insulated facet type needle (visioplex® - vygon - France) was introduced in plane in a cephalad to caudad direction until (L3) transverse process was hit [figure1(A)(B)(C)] and the needle was slightly withdrawn. The confirmation of the correct position of the needle tip was done by injecting 0.5-1 ml of LA. Once confirmed, 20 ml of the drug was administered under vision after confirming negative aspiration of blood. LA distribution was observed in both cranial and caudal directions. This was repeated on the other side also. Twenty minutes later, sensory loss to cold was evident between (T10-T 12) and (L5-S1) vertebral level of the posterior dermatomes and dermatomes of the anterior roots of the spinal nerves (lumbar plexus, upper leg) on both sides without hemodynamic changes. Motor function of the legs was evaluated with a Bromage (0-3) score. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| changes in Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) length of stay | assessment of changes in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) length of stay in (minutes) during the first 24 hours was reported. | at 1hours, 6hours, 12hours, and 24 hours after the operation |
| changes in the total dose of postoperative analgesics need | assessment of changes in the total dose of postoperative analgesics need in the first 24 hours were reported. | at 1hours, 6hours, 12hours, and 24 hours after the operation |
| changes in postoperative visual analogue score (VAS) | assessment of changes in the postoperative visual analogue score (VAS)in the first 24 hours was reported. Scoring and Interpretation: Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity. Based on the distribution of pain VAS scores in post-surgical patients who described their postoperative pain intensity as none, mild, moderate, or severe, the following cut points on the pain VAS have been recommended: no pain (0-4 mm), mild pain(5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75-100 mm) . Normative values are not available. The scale has to be shown to the patient otherwise it is an auditory scale, not a visual one. | at 1hours, 6hours, 12hours, and 24 hours after the operation |
| changes in recovery time | assessment of changes in the recovery time length in (minutes) during the first 24 hours was reported. | at 1hours, 6hours, 12hours, and 24 hours after the operation |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ahmed Said Elgebaly | Tanta | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30166664 | Background | Chaudhary NK, Singh S. Continuous ultrasound-guidederector spinae plane block for post-operative pain management in lumbar spine surgery: A case series. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Aug;62(8):638-639. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_160_18. No abstract available. | |
| 29704223 | Result | Melvin JP, Schrot RJ, Chu GM, Chin KJ. Low thoracic erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesia in lumbosacral spine surgery: a case series. Can J Anaesth. 2018 Sep;65(9):1057-1065. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1145-8. Epub 2018 Apr 27. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 29548343 | Result | Zhang S, Ye C, Lai Q, Yu X, Liu X, Nie T, Zhan H, Dai M, Zhang B. Double-level lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: A retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Mar 16;13(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0723-3. |
| 29794943 | Result | Adhikary SD, Bernard S, Lopez H, Chin KJ. Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Retrolaminar Block: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Anatomical Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Oct;43(7):756-762. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000798. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013168 | Spondylolisthesis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013169 | Spondylolysis |
| D055009 | Spondylosis |
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided