Comparison of Surgical Techniques for the Eradication of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis of the Vagina: a Case-control Study
Comparison of Surgical Techniques for the Eradication of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis of the Vagina: a Case-control Study
Multicentric retrospective study about the comparison of two different techniques of vaginal breach suturing after eradication surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis and the surgical approaches (laparoscopic or vaginal) in terms of surgical, clinical and functional outcomes.
Treatment of vaginal endometriosis can be successfully performed by vaginal or laparoscopic approach.
The results of the surgical treatment confirm its validity with regard to the reduction of dyspareunia in the short to medium term but show less efficacy in the long follow-up. The long-term impact of surgery on sexual function may be influenced by multiple factors, such as recurrence of symptomatic or anatomical disease, preservation of autonomic nerve fibers responsible for the arousal and genital sensitivity and residual vaginal length. These factors are potentially dependent on the surgical approach performed to treat vaginal endometriosis.
Particular importance as a surgical step assumes the closing phase of the vaginal defect that can be performed through a transverse or longitudinal suture. The longitudinal suture could guarantee, theoretically, a greater residual vaginal length and a better sexual function in the postoperative period than the vaginal closure by transversal suture, as demonstrated in previous studies about the suture techniques of vaginal cuff after hysterectomy.
Up to date, there are no studies comparing surgical, clinical and functional outcomes of the vaginal suture neither the two surgical approaches (laparoscopic or vaginal) for vaginal endometriosis eradication.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: