This multi-center longitudinal study aims to compare the survival outcomes (including overall survival, progression-free survival and disease-free survival between uterine cervical patients receiving different surgical routes (vaginal, laparotomy and laparoscopy), which is the primary study objective. All clinical and pathological data would be retracted from case reviews, and all survival data would be reached by clinic, telephone and mail follow-up. This study also would analyze the impact on survival outcomes of other factors, including nerve-sparing techniques, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and infection of human papillomavirus. The predictive effects of different following protocol and imaging plans will be also compared. Last, the influences of surgical routes on the fertility outcomes (pregnancy and its complications) and the ovarian reserve are important secondary study objectives.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Pathological confirmed as uterine cervical cancer
• Having definite clinical information
• Having received radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

• Not satisfying any of the inclusion criteria

All patients pathological confirmed as uterine cervival cancer and receiving radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy would been included.

All the data will be available to all researchers on the public websites