Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study evaluates the effectiveness of Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Neuromodulation in the lumbar multifidus of L3 in non-specific chronic low back pain.
The effectiveness of neuromoduation in analgesic therapies has been more than contrasted. Considering that multifidus muscles, composed of the spinous transverse rotators muscles and spinous transverse multifidus muscles, are fundamental both for the static and for the dynamics of the lumbar spine, particularly for the region of L-3, the treatment of this musculature with ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuromodulation in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain must have an analgesic repercussion in this nociceptive process.
Therefore, given that neuromodulation has been considered as a more than effective treatment in painful symptomatology and that diverse scientific literature has proven the activity of the multifida musculature directly affects the stability and mobility of the lumbar spine, it is more than likely interventions with neuromodulative treatments in the multifidus musculature at the level of the third lumbar vertebrae have positive results in Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Neuromodulation | Experimental | This group will be treated with percutaneous neuromodulation using a needle with Physio InvasiveĀ® device, in its modality of percutaneous electrostimulation for 15 minutes, and guided by ultrasound equipment in the multifidus muscles of L3 (1 times/ 4 weeks). |
|
| TENS therapy | Active Comparator | The control group will apply a transcutaneous treatment with surface electrodes with TENS current at 170 Hz for 15 minutes in the L-3 region (1 times/ 4 weeks). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound- guided Percutaneous Neuromulation | Other | The experimental group will be treated with percutaneous neuromodulation using a needle with Physio InvasiveĀ® device, in its modality of percutaneous electrostimulation for 15 minutes, and guided by ultrasound equipment in the multifidus muscles of L-3, once a week for 4 weeks. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) | This is a self-reported questionnaire consisting in 24 Ćtems reflecting limitations in different activities of daily living attributed to low back pain including walking, vending over, sitting, lying down, dressing, sleeping, self-care and daily activities. | At baseline and at 4 weeks (immediate post-treatment) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline in disability. Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (ODI). | It has 10 items associated to activities of daily living, each item has a puntuation fron 0 to 5 points. | At baseline and at 4 weeks (immediate post-treatment) |
| Change from baseline in pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adelaida MarĆa Castro-SĆ”nchez | AlmerĆa | 04120 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28456669 | Background | Goubert D, De Pauw R, Meeus M, Willems T, Cagnie B, Schouppe S, Van Oosterwijck J, Dhondt E, Danneels L. Lumbar muscle structure and function in chronic versus recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional study. Spine J. 2017 Sep;17(9):1285-1296. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.025. Epub 2017 Apr 26. | |
| 20193941 | Background |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Neuromodulación elĆ©ctrica y dolor raquĆdeo. | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017116 | Low Back Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001416 | Back Pain |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| TENS Therapy | Other | The control group will apply a transcutaneous treatment with surface electrodes with TENS current at 170 Hz for 15 minutes in the L-3 region, once a week for 4 weeks. |
|
A 10-point Numerical Pain Scale (0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) assesses the intensity of pain. |
| At baseline and at 4 weeks (immediate post-treatment) |
| Change from baseline in Fear of Movement. Tampa Scale of kinesiophobia. | It is a 17-item questionnaire that measures the fear of movement and (re)injury | At baseline and at 4 weeks (immediate post-treatment) |
| Change from baseline on Quality of Life. | SF-36 Health questionnaire scores range from 0 to 100% and indicate the self-perceived health-related quality of life. | At baseline and at 4 weeks (immediate post-treatment) |
| Change from Mcquade Test | It measures the isometric endurance of trunk flexion muscles | At baseline and at 4 weeks (immediate post-treatment) |
| Change from baseline in lumbar mobility flexion | It is determined by measuring the finger-to-floor distance | At baseline and at 4 weeks (immediate post-treatment) |
| Change from baseline in range of motion and lumbar segmental mobility | This variable is quantified using the SpinalMouseĀ® device (Phisiotech, Spain). It is an electronic computer-aided measuring device that measures sagital spinal amplitude of movement (ROM) and intersegmental angles in a non-invasive way. | At baseline and at 4 weeks (immediate post-treatment) |
| Freeman MD, Woodham MA, Woodham AW. The role of the lumbar multifidus in chronic low back pain: a review. PM R. 2010 Feb;2(2):142-6; quiz 1 p following 167. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.11.006. |
| 28062862 | Background | Rajfur J, Pasternok M, Rajfur K, Walewicz K, Fras B, Bolach B, Dymarek R, Rosinczuk J, Halski T, Taradaj J. Efficacy of Selected Electrical Therapies on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Comparative Clinical Pilot Study. Med Sci Monit. 2017 Jan 7;23:85-100. doi: 10.12659/msm.899461. |
| 27075679 | Background | Bredow J, Bloess K, Oppermann J, Boese CK, Lohrer L, Eysel P. [Conservative treatment of nonspecific, chronic low back pain : Evidence of the efficacy - a systematic literature review]. Orthopade. 2016 Jul;45(7):573-8. doi: 10.1007/s00132-016-3248-7. German. |
| 19027343 | Background | Wallwork TL, Stanton WR, Freke M, Hides JA. The effect of chronic low back pain on size and contraction of the lumbar multifidus muscle. Man Ther. 2009 Oct;14(5):496-500. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.09.006. Epub 2008 Nov 21. |
| 18349481 | Background | Hides JA, Stanton WR, McMahon S, Sims K, Richardson CA. Effect of stabilization training on multifidus muscle cross-sectional area among young elite cricketers with low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Mar;38(3):101-8. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2658. Epub 2007 Dec 7. |
| 1188084 | Background | Kirby CC. A look at radiologic technology education. Radiol Technol. 1975 Sep-Oct;47(2):82-9. |
| 30311692 | Background | Ramirez-Garcia I, Blanco-Ratto L, Kauffmann S, Carralero-Martinez A, Sanchez E. Efficacy of transcutaneous stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve compared to percutaneous stimulation in idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: Randomized control trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Jan;38(1):261-268. doi: 10.1002/nau.23843. Epub 2018 Oct 12. |
| 30302288 | Background | Nayak R, Banik RK. Current Innovations in Peripheral Nerve Stimulation. Pain Res Treat. 2018 Sep 13;2018:9091216. doi: 10.1155/2018/9091216. eCollection 2018. |
| 29905630 | Background | Ilfeld BM, Gabriel RA, Said ET, Monahan AM, Sztain JF, Abramson WB, Khatibi B, Finneran JJ 4th, Jaeger PT, Schwartz AK, Ahmed SS. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: Neuromodulation of the Sciatic Nerve for Postoperative Analgesia Following Ambulatory Foot Surgery, a Proof-of-Concept Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Aug;43(6):580-589. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000819. |
| 30160335 | Background | Ilfeld BM, Said ET, Finneran JJ 4th, Sztain JF, Abramson WB, Gabriel RA, Khatibi B, Swisher MW, Jaeger P, Covey DC, Robertson CM. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: Neuromodulation of the Femoral Nerve for Postoperative Analgesia Following Ambulatory Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Proof of Concept Study. Neuromodulation. 2019 Jul;22(5):621-629. doi: 10.1111/ner.12851. Epub 2018 Aug 30. |
| 21971895 | Background | Facci LM, Nowotny JP, Tormem F, Trevisani VF. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential currents (IFC) in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain: randomized clinical trial. Sao Paulo Med J. 2011;129(4):206-16. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802011000400003. |
| 25122629 | Background | Valera-Garrido F, Minaya-Munoz F, Medina-Mirapeix F. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle electrolysis in chronic lateral epicondylitis: short-term and long-term results. Acupunct Med. 2014 Dec;32(6):446-54. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2014-010619. Epub 2014 Aug 13. |
| 21992165 | Background | Gofeld M. Ultrasound-guided caudad epidural access for the lumbosacral neurostimulation: case report and technical note. Neuromodulation. 2011 Jan;14(1):68-71; discussion 71. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2010.00297.x. Epub 2010 Oct 7. |
| Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: A multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. | View source |
| Prospective, Two-part Study of the Interaction Between Spinal Cord Stimulation and Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation in Patients with Low Back Pain: Development of a New Spinal-Peripheral Neurostimulation Method | View source |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |