Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Santa Catarina Federal University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Back pain is often accompanied by changes in function. The performance of individuals with their backs on their wills may become more functional. It is believed that the test will present good to excellent reliability in individuals with chronic back pain. From this, it can be used in the clinic to verify the functional capacity of these individuals.
This study will be performed to verify the reliability of the functional tests for individuals with back pain. A study in which individuals with back pain will be assessed on the first day and after the interval of seven days. They should perform the 6-minute walk test and answer some questionnaires such as the Roland Morris - disability questionnaire, the IPAQ - physical activity level questionnaire and Numeric Rating Scale, after the tests will be performed Timed 10-Meter Walk Test and 30 Second Sit to Stand Test. To avoid a random error, a minimum sample size of 30 participants is required. For statistical analysis, Shapiro-Wilk test will be used for data normalization and the reliability between measurements will be calculated through do Intraclass Correlation Coefficients, standard error of measurement and Minimal Detectable Change. There were no studies in the literature and recorded in the Clinical Trials that evaluated the reliability of these tests for individuals with chronic low back pain.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Tests | Experimental | Participants undertook 6-minute walk test, 10 meters walk test and 30 second sit to stand test. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-minute walk test | Diagnostic Test | First day: Participants undertook 6-minute walk test. There was a 30-minute interval between the first and second test, when the patient was asked to rest. During the resting period, they respond a pain intensity, functional capacity and physical activity level questionnaire. Second day: the participants repeated the test and questionnaires. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Distance traveled in meters. | Measured by the 6-minute walk test. Individuals should walk in a 30 meter corridor for 6 uninterrupted minutes. | The individual will perform 42 minutes of testing, two walking tests of 6 minutes plus 30 minutes of rest |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain intensity | Measured through the Numerical Rating Scale, being considered an improvement of pain, the reduction of 2,5 points in the NRS. Evaluated at the beginning and after the tests. | 5 minutes |
| Functional Incapacity |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Aline L Ballico, Student | Santa Catarina Federal University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santa Catarina Federal University | Araranguá | Santa Catarina | 88.905-120 | Brazil |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16550448 | Background | Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G; COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for Chronic Low Back Pain. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006 Mar;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S192-300. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1. No abstract available. | |
| 12091180 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017116 | Low Back Pain |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001416 | Back Pain |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000070857 | Walk Test |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005080 | Exercise Test |
| D006334 | Heart Function Tests |
| D003935 | Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All data were color coded to guarantee that the investigator who processed the data was blinded to the conditions.
Not provided
|
| 10 meters walk test | Diagnostic Test | First day: After the second 6-minute walk test the participants perform the 10-meter walk test, the test must be performed three times with a 30-second interval, at the end the average test velocity. Second day: the participants repeated the test. |
|
| 30 Second Sit to Stand Test | Diagnostic Test | At the end of the tests the participants perform the 30 Second Sit to Stand Test on the first and second day. |
|
Measured using the Roland Morris functional disability questionnaire considering improvement the decrease of 2.5 points.
| 10 minutes |
| Physical activity level | The scores obtained through the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) are obtained through the minutes of activities performed per week, classifying the individual as very active, active, irregularly active and sedentary | 10 minutes |
| Gait Speed | Measured through the 10 meters walk test that measures walking speed in meters per second for a short period. Individual walks without assistance 10 meters (32.8 feet) and the time is measured for the intermediate 6 meters (19.7 feet) to allow for acceleration and deceleration. | 5 minutes |
| Functional lower extremity strength | Measured through the 30 Second Sit to Stand Test, which evaluates the functional limb strength with the number of sit and stand repetitions for 30 seconds. | 30 seconds. |
| Background |
| ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102. No abstract available. |
| Background | Britto RR, Sousa LAP. Teste de caminhada de seis minutos- Uma normatização brasileira. Fisioterapia em Movimento 19(4):49-54, 2006. |
| 28192793 | Background | Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, Skelly A, Hashimoto R, Weimer M, Fu R, Dana T, Kraegel P, Griffin J, Grusing S, Brodt ED. Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):493-505. doi: 10.7326/M16-2459. Epub 2017 Feb 14. |
| 12900694 | Background | Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB. |
| 9817683 | Background | Enright PL, Sherrill DL. Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Nov;158(5 Pt 1):1384-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.5.9710086. |
| 27330520 | Background | Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31. |
| 15864670 | Background | Lamoth CJ, Meijer OG, Daffertshofer A, Wuisman PI, Beek PJ. Effects of chronic low back pain on trunk coordination and back muscle activity during walking: changes in motor control. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15(1):23-40. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0825-y. Epub 2005 Apr 29. |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |