Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Several studies had analyzed the correlation between embryo transfer operator experience and implantation, clinical pregnancy, abortion and delivery rate.
The aim of the present study is determining if the probabilities of embryo implantation and pregnancy are associated to the operator performing the embryo transfer.
This study allows following more than 30 different operators in a global period of 20 years with almost 20,000 procedures.
Several studies had analyzed the correlation between embryo transfer operator experience and implantation, clinical pregnancy, abortion and delivery rate. Until now, the evidences are mixed and inconclusive.
The aim of the present study is determining if the probabilities of embryo implantation and pregnancy are associated to the operator performing the embryo transfer.
The database includes all the fresh embryo transfers, performed between January 1997 and December 2016 at Humanitas Fertility Center after IVF-ICSI cycles. Only embryo transfers performed by the surgeon on duty for that day ("Gynecologist of the Day") will be included.
Secondary end point is to evaluate if it is possible to draw a learning curve for transfer in terms of pregnancies for the different surgeons.
The strength of this study relies on the completeness of the preoperative factors and follow up and on the vastest dataset in literature that can permit to correct for multiple confounders and analyze a wide group of outcomes.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Embryo transfer | Other | all the fresh embryo transfers, performed between January 1997 and December 2016 at Humanitas Fertility Center after IVF-ICSI cycles, divided per operator |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy rate per operator | number of viable intrauterine embryos/ total number of embryos transferred per operator | 20 years |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
The study database includes all the fresh embryo transfers, performed between January 1997 and December 2016 at Humanitas Fertility Center after IVF-ICSI cycles. Only embryo transfers performed by the surgeon on duty for that day ("Gynecologist of the Day") will be included. A wider similar database was used for a previous research.
Data are collected using an exclusive internal web-based database.
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21075368 | Background | Uyar A, Bener A, Ciray HN, Bahceci M. Physician experience in performing embryo transfers may affect outcome. Fertil Steril. 2011 Apr;95(5):1860-2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.10.036. | |
| 11870120 | Background | van Weering HG, Schats R, McDonnell J, Vink JM, Vermeiden JP, Hompes PG. The impact of the embryo transfer catheter on the pregnancy rate in IVF. Hum Reprod. 2002 Mar;17(3):666-70. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.3.666. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007246 | Infertility |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004624 | Embryo Transfer |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D027724 | Reproductive Techniques, Assisted |
| D012099 | Reproductive Techniques |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 32100020 | Derived | Cirillo F, Patrizio P, Baccini M, Morenghi E, Ronchetti C, Cafaro L, Zannoni E, Baggiani A, Levi-Setti PE. The human factor: does the operator performing the embryo transfer significantly impact the cycle outcome? Hum Reprod. 2020 Feb 29;35(2):275-282. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez290. |