Patient and Staff Experience of Ambulatory Emergency Care on the Surgical Admissions Unit (SAU)
Patient and Staff Experience of Ambulatory Emergency Care on the Surgical Admissions Unit (SAU)
Emergency ambulatory care ("day-case" care that does not involve staying in a hospital bed overnight) is now well-established for medical patients and is being used increasingly for surgical patients. However, it is not known how emergency surgical patients feel about being managed in this way compared to being admitted to a hospital ward. The investigating team believe that some people will find it easier and would prefer to be able to stay at home overnight but others may find this difficult or dislike this method of care.
The investigators want to explore staff and patients' experience of this type of care with semi-structured telephone interviews. The interviews will take around 20-30mins each. The anticipated number of patient participants needed is 20 and 12-15 staff members.
This is a qualitative study of patient and staff experience. Data will be collected by semi-structured telephone and face-to-face interviews.
Abdominal pain is a common reason for people to attend hospital as an emergency. It makes up a considerable proportion of the patients being admitted under the care of general surgeons. Other common reasons for people attending include infections such as abscesses and problems following previous surgery.
A Surgical Assessment Unit (SAU) is an ambulatory area with a waiting room and assessment cubicles. It is staffed by a triage nurse or healthcare assistant and doctors from the surgical team. Patients can be assessed and have investigations including blood tests and radiology procedures including x-rays, ultrasound and CT. After assessment they are either admitted to the ward, discharged home or have their care continued in an ambulatory manner returning in the next few days for further or repeat assessment.
Previously patients were either discharged or admitted for observation, investigation and treatment such as intravenous antibiotics. Many of these patients could be managed safely in a "day case" manner. This pathway allows for re-attendance should it be required.
Emergency ambulatory care is well-established in medicine for conditions such as suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and transient ischaemic attack (TIA) but has not yet been widely adopted in surgery. There is uncertainty surrounding the best way of looking after these patients as the diagnosis is often uncertain and it can be difficult to judge which patients require admission.
Pilot studies have shown that up to 30% of emergency general surgical patients could be managed in this way. These studies also report a high patient satisfaction score but do not inform us what works, why and for whom. These would be important considerations for organisations looking to expand their emergency general surgical ambulatory service.
This study aims to expand upon previous work in this area by conducting semi-structured interviews with patients who have experienced emergency general surgical ambulatory care. The investigating team aim to achieve a representative sample of participants by age, attending condition and satisfaction score. They will identify themes that influence patient experience of emergency ambulatory care and whether this might vary depending on patient factors such as age, social support/responsibilities and attending condition.
Patient participants will be recruited to the study by the clinical team by means of short verbal explanation and the provision of an information sheet. Potential participants will give their contact details to be passed to the study team or will make contact themselves at a later stage. They will then by contacted by the study team and given further information over the telephone. Those wishing to proceed will have arrangements made for a telephone interview. A recording of consent will be made prior to the start of the interview and will be stored as a separate audio file.
The interview schedule has been drawn up based on areas that have emerged from work in the past using patient diaries. (Improving the Patient Experience of Ambulatory Care in the Surgical Assessment Unit, 2014) The PPI work done has included review of these questions for acceptability and ease of understanding and minor changes have been made to the wording of questions as a result. The prompts used are mainly to encourage explanations of why participants have answered the way they have.
The interviews will last 20-40mins and will be recorded using digital recording software. They will be conducted by the principal investigator. No potentially identifiable information will be recorded and participants will be advised not to divulge identifiable information prior to the interview. If this occurs inadvertently it will be deleted prior to transcription. These audio recordings will be given an anonymous identification number and then be transcribed into text documents using a paid transcription service within the UK. Once the transcription has been completed the recording will be deleted.
The transcribed data will be stored on a NHS server. It will be available for access to the study team by password protection and on request in an anonymised form by the university sponsor. Once the study is complete it will be stored on a university repository for the period required for archive and deleted from the NHS server.
The transcribed data will be coded and then undergo thematic analysis using NVIVO software. Coding will be done by the principal investigator and a proportion of the data will be separately coded by the 2 senior members of the study team. Interim analysis will be conducted after each 5 patients and the interview schedule may undergo some change to explore in more detail areas of interest that emerge.
If groups are underrepresented in the interim analysis then there may be targeted recruitment to the underrepresented group. This may include the characteristics of patient age and overall satisfaction with care given.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient participant exclusion criteria: