Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| PhD_23017 | Other Grant/Funding Number | Bowel Research UK |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Bowel Research UK | UNKNOWN |
| NHS Lothian | OTHER_GOV |
| NHS Grampian | OTHER_GOV |
| NHS Tayside |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Emergency General Surgery (EGS) is an umbrella term which describes all patients presenting to hospital with an acute abdominal problem. Patients can have various conditions requiring emergency operations. EGS is one of the most common reasons for an emergency admission in the UK.
EGS is often referred to as "high-risk" surgery. For those patients who do survive after their surgery, many struggle with frailty and new medical problems resulting in a reduction in their quality of life (QoL).
The goal of this observational study is to explore QoL and decision-making in EGS through questionnaires and interviews with patients, families/supporters and consultants working in EGS.
Workstream 1 will involve patients and families/supporters. Workstream 2 will involve consultants.
The investigators are interested in patients who have either undergone EGS (EmLaps) or have needed but not undergone EGS (NoLaps). The investigators are interested in exploring participants (patients, families/supporters and consultants) experiences of this EmLap vs NoLap decision.
The main questions the investigators want to answer are:
Workstream 1 participants (patients and family members/supporters) will complete questionnaires and take part in interviews at different time-points following their decision (1 month/3 months/ 9-12 months). Questionnaires and interviews will explore QoL and decision-making in EGS.
Consultant participants will be asked to complete an online survey and/or take part in an individual interview. Both will explore decision-making in EGS.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| EmLap patients | Patients who have underwent Emergency General Surgery | ||
| NoLap patients | Patients who have needed but not undergone Emergency General Surgery. | ||
| Families/Supporters | Family or supporter nominated by the patient participant to participate in the study alongside them. | ||
| Consultants | Consultants who actively participate in Emergency General Surgery in a UK-based Hospital (Surgeons, Anaesthetists, Intensivists) |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Life (QoL) | The primary aim of workstream 1 is to report on the long-term QoL of EmLap and NoLap patients and their families/supporters. For this, participants will complete validated QoL questionnaires within 4 weeks of EmLap/NoLap decision then again at 3 and 9-12 months post-decision. Questionnaires will include European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) which will specifically quantify QoL. Maximum score= 1. Minimum scores in the UK have been reported at -0.28. A higher score reflects a higher QoL. | 1 year |
| Decision-making | The primary aim of workstream 2 is to describe and explore consultant experiences of decision-making in EGS through online survey and semi-structured interviews. | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Decision-making | Semi-structured interviews with patients and families/supporters will allow us to explore their experience and views of decision-making in EGS. | 1 year |
| Consultant specialities involved in decision-making |
Not provided
Group 1 and 2: EmLap and NoLap patients (up to 30 participants)
Patient inclusion/exclusion criteria should mirror NELA inclusion/exclusion criteria and NELA NoLap guidelines. NELA is the "National Emergency Laparotomy Audit" which recruits patients in Wales and England and there inclusion/exclusion criteria are widely accepted for use in Emergency General Surgery research.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Group 3: Families/Supporters (up to 30 participants) Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Group 3: Consultants (interview:12-20 participants/survey: minimum 52 participants) Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
• Consultants not done >2 years of on-call
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Project will recruit EmLap and NoLap patients from the 6 sites across Scotland with the highest EmLaps per year (Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Ninewells Hospital, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary).
Consultants will be recruited from UK only.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rachel John-Charles, MBChB, Bsc (Hons), MRSC | Contact | 07962471992 | rachel.john-charles@nhs.scot | |
| Susan Moug, MBChB, Bsc (Hons), FRSC, PhD | Contact | susan.moug2@nhs.scot |
Not provided
Not provided
Psuedonymized personal data will retained only for as long as required for processing (1 year after project has ended). Only depersonalised anonymous research data will be stored for a longer period of time and shared with other researchers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| University of Glasgow | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Workstream 1 will clarify which specialties are involved in the EGS decision-making process to allow recruitment for workstream 2.
We will specifically clarify the number of EGS decisions which involve
| 1 year |
| Patient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) for Emergency General Surgery | The results from workstream 1 will inform the development of PROMs for EGS. These PROMS will include a number of specific EGS related questions developed from our study results. | 1 year |
| Patient Reported Experience Measurements (PREMs) for Emergency General Surgery | The results from workstream 1 will inform the development of PREMs for EGS. These PREMS will include a number of specific EGS related questions developed from our study results. | 1 year |