The quality of care associated with medical procedures, such as procedural sedation, has historically been assessed from the perspective of the healthcare professional, wherein the appropriateness of the services provided and the skill with which this care was performed were considered. However, more recently, the perspectives of consumers of healthcare services (i.e. the patients) have also been sought in the form of patient satisfaction. A review of the literature shows that patient satisfaction is routinely assessed when determining the effectiveness of sedation; however, it is less frequently assessed as the primary outcome. In child-specific, validated studies, limitations are noted with respect to being validated in a language other than English and failing to encompass a variety of procedures. As a result, these validated tools are not appropriate for use with pediatric populations undergoing procedural sedation in North America, nor are these validated tools amenable to comparison with our proposed tool.

Due to the central unit procedural sedation team servicing several areas of specialty, a varied patient satisfaction tool is required to ensure all concerns pertaining to sedation in each specialty are addressed, as well as allowing consistency between specialties to be examined. Therefore, the objective is to develop and validate a procedural sedation satisfaction tool for use with a variety of specialties requiring pediatric procedural sedation.

Inclusion Criteria for Parents:

• child is receiving procedural sedation within the central unit at our facility
• child is aged 0-8 years

Exclusion Criteria for Parents:

• parent self-identifies as not being able to speak or read English

Inclusion Criteria for Healthcare Team Members:

• work within the central unit providing procedural sedation at our facility

Exclusion Criteria for Healthcare Team Members:

• none

Parent population will be based on those receiving services within our central unit.