Unknown statusInterventionalNot ApplicableLast updated May 1, 2018

Primary Urethral Realignment vs. Suprapubic Cystostomy for Initial Management of Pediatric Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury

Primary Urethral Realignment vs. Suprapubic Cystostomy for Initial Management of Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury in Children: Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03468387
Lead Sponsor: Assiut UniversityOTHER
Brief Summary: It is prospective randomized comparative clinical trial comparing primary urethral realignment vs. suprapubic cystostomy in initial management of pediatric pelvic fracture urethral injury regarding:

The success rate after initial intervention.

The need for urethroplasty in the failed realignment group and cystostomy group.

The success rate of urethroplasty in the failed realignment group and cystostomy group.

Status

Overall Status: Unknown status
Start Date: Jun 1, 2018Estimated
Primary Completion Date: Jun 1, 2021Estimated
Completion Date: Jun 1, 2021Estimated

Study Record Dates

First Submitted: Mar 6, 2018
First Submitted that Met QC Criteria: Mar 15, 2018
First Posted: Mar 16, 2018Actual
Last Update Submitted that Met QC Criteria: Apr 30, 2018
Last Update Posted: May 1, 2018Actual
Last Verified: Apr 2018

NCT03195179Completed

Primary Urethral Realignment Versus Suprapubic Cystostomy After Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury

NCT03533270Unknown status

Urological Outcome of Posterior Urethroplasty in Patients in Assuit University

NCT02055430Completed

Ureteral Stents Versus Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Initial Urinary Drainage

NCT02139059Unknown status

Delayed or Direct Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Pediatric Calcular Anuria

NCT06248047Unknown status

Vessel-sparing Technique Versus Conventional Repair of PFUI: A Prospective Comparative Study

NCT06012864Not yet recruiting

Supine Versus Prone PNL in Pediatric