Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| CEISO | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
DISCOGEL® is on the market since 2007. About 20,000 kits were sold to date (October 2017). The device re-obtained its CE mark in 2017.
A clinical evaluation was performed by bibliographic route in 2016. Clinical data on more than 600 patients treated by DISCOGEL® were analyzed. These data should be confirmed by monitoring on the long term, with a large cohort of patients, over a two-year follow-up period.
As part of the post-CE surveillance, the manufacturer GELSCOM is responsible of this "Post-Market Clinical Follow-up" (PMCF) study in accordance with Directive 93/42/EEC and MEDDEV guide 2.12/2, to assess the efficacy and the long-term safety of DISCOGEL®.
The study is comparative. The results will evaluate the performance and safety of the CE-marked medical device used in "real life", in comparison with a steroid infiltration, used according to its indication and to the current standards. It will include economic data. Patients and evaluators will be blinded. Both DISCOGEL® and HYDROCORTANCYL 2,5 POUR CENT are authorized products used according to their intended use.
This is an interventional, prospective, national, multi-center, comparative, randomized, single-blind (patient and evaluator) post-market clinical study. The primary objective is to compare the short-term efficacy profile of DISCOGEL® versus intradiscal steroid.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethanol gel | Experimental | CE-marked medical device used according to its instructions for use: GELSCOM® Single injection in the selected disc(s) of 0.6 to 2.2 ml |
|
| Steroid infiltration | Active Comparator | Authorized drug used according to its summary product characteristics: HYDROCORTANCYL 2,5 POUR CENT Single injection in the selected disc(s) of 0.2 to 2.0 ml |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethanol gel | Device | Intradiscal injection of ethanol gel |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Short-term efficacy profile | Compare the short-term efficacy profile of DISCOGEL® versus intradiscal steroid: percentage of patients with a pain relief defined by a Low Back Pain (LBP) intensity<4 cm on a Local Verbal Rating Scale (0 = no pain to 10 = maximum imaginable pain) | Month 3 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Long-term efficacy profile | Compare the long-term efficacy profile of DISCOGEL® versus intradiscal steroid: Local Verbal Rating Scale: on back, bottom, thigh, leg, foot | Month 12 |
| Long-term efficacy profile |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mathieu De Sèze, Dr | Contact | +335 56 79 55 16 | corinne.pallas@chu-bordeaux.fr | |
| Camélia Bentaleb | Contact | camelia.bentaleb@ceiso.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mathieu de Sèze, Dr | CHU Bordeaux Pellegrin | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital Pellegrin | Recruiting | Bordeaux | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C009935 | prednisolone acetate |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Prednisolone acetate | Drug | Intradiscal infiltration of steroids |
|
|
Compare the long-term efficacy profile of DISCOGEL® versus intradiscal steroid: Local Verbal Rating Scale: on back, bottom, thigh, leg, foot
| Month 24 |
| Short-term safety profile | Analyze the short- and long-term safety profile of DISCOGEL®: rates of complications and adverse reactions | Month 3 |
| Long-term safety profile | Analyze the short- and long-term safety profile of DISCOGEL®: rates of complications and adverse reactions | Month 12 |
| Long-term safety profile | Analyze the short- and long-term safety profile of DISCOGEL®: rates of complications and adverse reactions | Month 24 |
| Questionnaire OSWESTRY | Describe the rate of subjects improved 24 months after treatment: OSWESTRY scale | Month 24 |
| Questionnaire MacNab | Subjective improvement 24 months after treatment: MacNab scale | Month 24 |
| Radiography | Describe radiologic evolution of the lesions: radiography of the herniated disc | Month 3 |
| Radiography | Describe radiologic evolution of the lesions: radiography of the herniated disc | Month 12 |
| Radiography | Describe radiologic evolution of the lesions: radiography of the herniated disc | Month 24 |
| Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Describe radiologic evolution of the lesions: MRI of the herniated disc | Month 3 |
| Procedures costs | Compare the cost linked to the DISCOGEL® procedure and the cost linked to a steroid infiltration or surgery | Day 0 |
| Procedures durations | Compare the duration of the treatment procedures between a DISCOGEL® injection and a steroid infiltration or surgery | Day 0 |
| Hospital St-Dié-des-Vosges | Terminated | Saint-Dié | France |
| Hospital SUD La Reunion | Recruiting | Saint-Pierre | France |
|
| Hospital St-Etienne | Recruiting | Saint-Priest-en-Jarez | France |
|
| Hospital Valence | Terminated | Valence | France |