Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-A02670-53 | Other Identifier | ID-RCB number, ANSM |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Power assisted wheelchairs have specific advantages compared to manual propelled or powered Wheelchair. Autonomad Mobility has developed a new device (DUO), the assistance being triggered by the motion of the wheelchair and not an push on the hand rim, people who use their foot to move or people pushing the wheelchair can be helped by the device as people propelling the wheelchair with their arms.
Furthermore DUO has an option with a longer assistance (AEP+) which can be preferred by some people.
To be referenced and reimbursed by the French health insurance, DUO has to be compared with an other power assistance device for wheelchairs, already referenced.
The study is a comparative study between DUO and the ALBER E Motion. Each patient is his own control and is assessed in 4 experimental conditions, with intervals of 3 or 4 days, manually propelled, with the E mtion device, with the DUO device and the single push configuration, with the DUO device and the AEP+ configuration.
The main outcome measure will be the user's satisfaction (using 8 items of the ESAT questionnaire)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient in wheelchair | Patient in wheelchair with E-motion device |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E-motion device | Device | Powered assisted Wheelchair with the E-motion device. Outdoor and indoor runs |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| ESAT questionnaire | User satisfaction, using 8 items of the ESAT (Echelle de Satisfaction envers une Aide Technique) questionnaire | at 12 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Success rate during the indoor test (wheelchair skill program) | at 12 days | |
| Time to perform the wheelchair skill program | at 12 days | |
| Time run |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patient with a motor deficiency (of any origin) needing a manual wheelchair
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| André Thevenon, MD,PhD | University Hospital, Lille | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hôpital Swynghedauw, CHU | Lille | France |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010264 | Paraplegia |
| D006429 | Hemiplegia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010243 | Paralysis |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
During a 500 m outdoor run |
| at 12 days |
| Maximal heart rate | During a 500 m outdoor run | at 12 days |
| Effort assessment by the Borg scale | During a 500 m outdoor run The 10-point Borg scale ranges from 0 "nothing at all" to 10 "maximal/extremely strong" and will be used to rate the intensity of dyspnea | at 12 days |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |