Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to compare three assisting devices to propel personal wheelchairs (Servomatic A©, Servomatic B© and E.Motion©) to the standard personal manual wheelchair in patients with spinal cord injury.
The objective of the study is to compare three assisting devices to propel personal wheelchairs (Servomatic A©, Servomatic B© and E.Motion©) to the standard personal manual wheelchair in patients with spinal cord injury.
The study consists of three distinct and independent phases:
The three phases are to be performed using the standard manual wheelchair and the three assisting devices in a randomized order.
Three different groups of patients are included in the three phases of the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Performance evaluation on ergometer | Experimental | The 3 devices are experimented in random order to compare them on performance using an ergometer wheelchair:
|
|
| Phase 2: Comparison of maneuverability | Experimental | The 3 devices are experimented in random order to compare them on maneuverability:
|
|
| Phase 3: Comparison of the autonomy | Experimental | The 3 devices are experimented in random order to compare them on the autonomy they afford to patients:
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Servomatic™ assisting device | Device | Servomatic™ is an hand controlled motorized device assisting to propel the wheelchair . |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: physiological parameters : Oxygen consumption. | 3 hours | |
| Phase 2: Ease of crossing obstacles assessed by patients with a Visual Analog Scale | 3 hours | |
| Phase 3: Time necessary to transfer from wheelchair to car and from car to wheelchair. | 3 hours |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nadine NP PELLEGRINI, MD | Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, 92380 Garches, France | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Raymond Poincaré Hospital | Garches | 92380 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25620717 | Derived | Guillon B, Van-Hecke G, Iddir J, Pellegrini N, Beghoul N, Vaugier I, Figere M, Pradon D, Lofaso F. Evaluation of 3 pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchairs in patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;96(5):894-904. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Jan 22. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| E.Motion© assisting device | Device | E.Motion© is an hand controlled motorized device assisting to propel the wheelchair . |
|
| Standard manual Wheelchair | Device | Standard manual Wheelchair |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013119 | Spinal Cord Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013118 | Spinal Cord Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided