Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The effects of cervical spine manual therapy, including mobilization and manipulation, on cervical spine range of motion, joint position sense, and balance is unknown among individuals with cervicogenic headache. Previous studies have indicated improved frequency of headache, decreased perceived disability, and demonstrated improved neuromuscular function following upper cervical manipulation. Other authors report improved cervical spine range of motion, joint position sense, and balance following cervical spine manual therapy for individuals with cervicogenic dizziness. Through an experimental design, this study aims to determine the effects of cervical spine manual therapy on variables such as cervical spine range motion, joint position sense, and balance among individuals with headache of a cervical spine origin.
A convenience sample will be utilized to obtain subjects who suffer from cervicogenic headaches, as defined by the International Headache Classification. Subjects will be given an online medical screening questionnaire to differentiate and screen additional types of headache symptoms (migraine, cluster, tension-type, for example) and identify possible contraindications for manual therapy treatment techniques and exclude individuals if necessary. Subjects will be randomized into one of three groups (upper cervical mobilization, upper cervical manipulation, or control) and be tested with the Cervical Flexion Rotation Test, Joint Position Error testing, and sensorimotor balance testing via NeuroCom Balance Master. Subjects with cervicogenic headaches will receive their assigned intervention and dependent variables will be reassessed immediately, as well as 4-weeks after initial intervention. Individuals in either intervention group (mobilization or manipulation) will also complete a specific home-exercise program, which has been reported to improve upper cervical range of motion, to the C1/2 segment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cervical Spine Mobilization Group | Experimental | Subjects with cervicogenic headache who will be assigned to cervical spine mobilization group and receive intervention directed to C1/2 of ipsilateral side of unilateral dominant headache. |
|
| Cervical Spine Manipulation Group | Experimental | Subjects with cervicogenic headache who will be assigned to cervical spine manipulation group and receive intervention directed to C1/2 of ipsilateral side of unilateral dominant headache. |
|
| Control Group | No Intervention | No intervention. Subjects in this groups will wait for 5 minutes between pre- and post-testing of dependent variables. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cervical Spine Mobilization | Procedure | C1/2 graded mobilizations (Grade III/IV) provided to C1/2 segment on ipsilateral side of unilateral headache. Mobilizations will be completed for 3 sets of 30 seconds. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Cervical Flexion Rotation Test (CFRT) | The Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) instrument will be placed on the subject. The subject will lie supine on the treatment table. The investigator will then passively flex the entire cervical spine and then rotate the head to both the left and right. The range of motion available in each direction, as measured by the CROM, will be recorded. | Post-Intervention, 4-weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Joint Position Error | The subject will have a small laser pointer mounted onto a lightweight headband, which they will wear. The patient will be seated 90 cm from the wall. The starting point that is projected by the laser on the bullseye is marked. The patient will have their eyes closed and will perform an active neck movement. After this, the patient will return their head as accurately as possible to the starting position. This will include 6 trials, which will include cervical flexion, extension and rotation. The final laser position is measured against the starting position in centimeters. Errors will be measured following active return from cervical extension, flexion and rotation. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Karen Abraham, PhD, PT | Shenandoah University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shenandoah University | Winchester | Virginia | 22601 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23771276 | Background | Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658. No abstract available. | |
| 26852024 | Result | Dunning JR, Butts R, Mourad F, Young I, Fernandez-de-Las Penas C, Hagins M, Stanislawski T, Donley J, Buck D, Hooks TR, Cleland JA. Upper cervical and upper thoracic manipulation versus mobilization and exercise in patients with cervicogenic headache: a multi-center randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 6;17:64. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0912-3. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006261 | Headache |
| D051298 | Post-Traumatic Headache |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Pre-test, Post-test, control group design 3 groups - mobilization, manipulation, control
Not provided
Not provided
Assessors of joint position sense, balance, and cervical spine range of motion via the Cervical Flexion Rotation Test will be blinded to group allocation
| Cervical Spine Manipulation | Procedure | C1/2 manipulation (Grade V) provided to C1/2 segment on ipsilateral side of unilateral headache. The goal of the manipulation technique is to elicit an audible cavitation. If no cavitation is achieved upon the first attempt, a second and final attempt will be completed. No more than two attempts will be utilized per each subject in this allocated group. |
|
| Post-Intervention, 4-weeks |
| Change in Balance as measured by NeuroCom Balance Master | A pre-programmed option on the NeuroCom Balance Master will be utilized to assess the Modified Clinical test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB). Three different conditions will be utilized and each condition will last 30 secs. Three trials will be completed for each condition.First, the subject will be asked to maintain their balance while their eyes are closed. The amount of postural sway that they demonstrate will be recorded. Second, the subject will be asked to maintain their balance with their eyes open while the platform on the NeuroCom Balance Master force plate moves. The amount of postural sway demonstrated will be recorded. Third, the subject will be asked to rotate their head all the way to the left, then rotate their head all the way to the right. They will continue rotating between sides for the duration of the 30 second trial. The amount of postural sway that they demonstrate will be recorded. | Post-Intervention, 4-weeks |
| 24792139 | Result | Reid SA, Callister R, Katekar MG, Rivett DA. Effects of cervical spine manual therapy on range of motion, head repositioning, and balance in participants with cervicogenic dizziness: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Sep;95(9):1603-12. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 2. |
| 19411769 | Result | Kristjansson E, Treleaven J. Sensorimotor function and dizziness in neck pain: implications for assessment and management. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;39(5):364-77. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2834. |
| 25983238 | Result | de Vries J, Ischebeck BK, Voogt LP, van der Geest JN, Janssen M, Frens MA, Kleinrensink GJ. Joint position sense error in people with neck pain: A systematic review. Man Ther. 2015 Dec;20(6):736-44. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.04.015. Epub 2015 May 2. |
| D051271 | Headache Disorders, Secondary |
| D020773 | Headache Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |