Effectiveness of Bioactiveglass Air Abrasion Versus Fluoride Varnish in Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity

Effectiveness of Sylc Air Abrasion Bioactive Glass Technology Versus Fluoride Varnish Application in Management of Hypersensitivity of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: Randomized Clinical Trial.

Will the use of Bioactive glass with air abrasion technology (Sylc) compared to Fluoride Varnish (Biflourid 10) affects the degree of pain in patients complaining from hypersensitivity due to non-carious lesions?

• Population: Patients complaining from Dentin Hypersensitivity due to non-carious lesions.
• Intervention: Sylc, Air Abrasion Bioactive glass (Denfotex Research Ltd.)
• Comparison: BiFlourid 10, Fluoride Varnish (VOCO, Germany)
• Outcome measures: Dentin Hypersensitivity

Outcome name Measuring device Measuring unit Dentin Hypersensitivity

• Thermal
• Tactile
• Evaporative

Inclusion Criteria:

• Males or females.
• Age: 18-70 years old.
• Patients with good oral hygiene.
• Co-operative patients who show interest to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with bad oral hygiene.
• Patients with orthodontic appliances, or bridge work that might interfere with evaluation.
• Patients who did any periodontal surgeries within the previous 6 months.
• Patients who are allergic to any ingredients will be used in the study.
• Pregnant and lactating women.